Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With or Without Concomitant Burch Colposuspension in Patients With Urinary Incontinence
2 other identifiers
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the impact of Burch colposuspension (BC), as an anti-incontinence measure, in patients with urinary incontinence (UI) undergoing abdominal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2002
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2007
CompletedDecember 18, 2007
December 1, 2007
December 17, 2007
December 17, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
changes in the incontinence rate as shown by a bladder diary, number of daily pads and the stress test.
2002-2006
Secondary Outcomes (1)
changes in subjective symptoms and Quality of Life (QoL) as measured by questionnaires
2002-2206
Study Arms (2)
group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORPelvic organ prolapse repair plus concomitant Burch Colposuspension
group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORPelvic organ prolapse without Burch colposuspension
Interventions
Abdominal pelvic organ prolapse repair and retropubic Burch colposuspension
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Benign or malignant uterus lesion (leiomyoma, fibromyoma, cervical or endometrial carcinoma)
- Active pelvic inflammatory disease,
- Known hypersensitivity to synthetic materials (polypropylene, polythetrafloroethilene, polyethileneterephtalate, polyglactil acid or polyglycolic acid)
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Evidence of clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, hepatic or respiratory diseases; and
- Any condition that in the judgment of the investigators would interfere with the subject's ability to provide informed consent, comply with study instructions, place the subject at increased risk, or which might confound interpretation of study results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Perugia
Perugia, Perugia, 06100, Italy
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisabetta Costantini, MD
University Of Perugia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2007
First Posted
December 18, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2002
Study Completion
December 1, 2006
Last Updated
December 18, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-12