NCT02312388

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in central venous catheter insertion time, success rate, and complication between thin-wall needle technique and catheter-over-the-needle technique for central venous catheterization in children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
138

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 9, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 27, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

central venous catheters

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Guide-wire insertion time

    interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after guide wire insertion, an expected average of 80 seconds

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Time to first puncture of central vein

    interval between skin penetration of the needle or catheter and flashback of blood, an expected average of 25 seconds

  • Total time of central venous catheter insertion

    interval between skin penetration of the needle or catheter and installation of the indwelling catheter, an expected average of 3 minutes

  • Number of central vein puncture trial

    up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 25 seconds

  • Number of guide-wire insertion trial

    up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 80 seconds

Study Arms (2)

Catheter-over-the-needle technique

EXPERIMENTAL

to use the 22G angiocatheter for central venous catheterization

Other: catheter-over-the-needle technique

Thin-wall needle technique

EXPERIMENTAL

to use the sharp hollow 23G needle for central venous catheterization

Other: Thin-wall needle technique

Interventions

using a 22 G Angiocath Plus™ catheter

Also known as: modified Seldinger technique
Catheter-over-the-needle technique

using 18 - 21 G introducer needle

Also known as: Seldinger technique
Thin-wall needle technique

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 5 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • surgery under general anesthesia
  • require central venous catheterization

You may not qualify if:

  • hematoma in central vein
  • central vein anomaly
  • catheterization site infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Study Officials

  • Jin-Tae Kim, MD. PhD

    Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2014

First Posted

December 9, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 9, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations