USS Virginia Closed-Loop Versus SAP Therapy for Hypoglycemia Reduction in T1D
Unified Safety System (USS) Virginia Closed-Loop Versus Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy for Hypoglycemia Reduction in Type 1 Diabetes
2 other identifiers
interventional
85
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, controlled trial of Unified Safety System (USS) Virginia closed-loop versus sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy for hypoglycemia prevention in subjects with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness and/or risk for hypoglycemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 7, 2022
CompletedOctober 7, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.6 years
November 24, 2014
March 4, 2022
September 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Hypoglycemia During Closed Loop Control (Assessed by Low Blood Glucose Index [LBGI])
Change in hypoglycemia during the study on USS Virginia versus Sensor Augmented Pump (SAP) as assessed by Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) from Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) during 1 week of baseline blinded use versus during the last week of intervention. The LBGI is a metric of the frequency and severity of hypoglycemia, based on an increasing weighting of progressively low glucose readings. The LBGI will be higher for someone with a higher percentage of low blood glucose readings or more extreme hypoglycemic episodes. Reference: Kovatchev BP. Metrics for Glycaemic Control: from HbA1c to Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 2017; 13: 425-436. PMID: 28304392
2 weeks total: one week of baseline blinded use to compute LBGI-Pre versus use during the last week of intervention to compute LBGI-Post
Study Arms (2)
AP System (DiAs or inControl) with USS Virginia
EXPERIMENTALSubject will complete an 8-hour inpatient assessment of hypoglycemia counterregulation. Subject will then proceed through 7 weeks of training and use of the AP System with USS Virginia and study pump. The inpatient testing will be repeated after wearing the AP System at home.
Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubject will complete an 8-hour inpatient assessment of hypoglycemia counterregulation. Subject will then wear a continuous glucose monitor and their own insulin pump at home for 5 weeks. The inpatient testing will be repeated at the completion of the 5 weeks at home.
Interventions
Subject will participate in two 24-hour study insulin pump and AP System training sessions. At the conclusion of each training session, subject will wear the equipment at home for a total of 5 weeks.
Subject will participate in 5 weeks use of CGM and personal insulin pump at home.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year. For an individual to be enrolled at least one criterion from each list must be met:
- Criteria for documented hyperglycemia (at least 1 must be met):
- Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL (confirmed)
- Two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose ≥200 mg/dL (confirmed)
- HbA1c ≥6.5% (confirmed)
- Random glucose ≥200 mg/dL with symptoms
- No data at diagnosis is available but the participant has a convincing history of hyperglycemia consistent with diabetes or in the opinion of the investigator participant has history consistent with type 1 diabetes.
- Criteria for requiring insulin at diagnosis (at least 1 must be met):
- Participant required insulin at diagnosis and continually thereafter
- Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but upon investigator review likely needed insulin (significant hyperglycemia that did not respond to oral agents) and did require insulin eventually and used continually
- Participant required insulin at diagnosis but continued to be hyperglycemic, had positive islet cell antibodies - consistent with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and did require insulin eventually and used continually thereafter
- Use of insulin for the last 12 months or more
- Use of an insulin infusion pump for the last 6 months or longer
- Age 12-70 years old
- HbA1c \<10.0% as measured with DCA2000 or equivalent device; if HbA1c \<6.0% then total daily insulin must be ≥0.5 U/kg
- +19 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in the 12 months prior to enrollment.
- Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Hematocrit less that the lower limit of normal for the assay.
- Pregnancy, breast-feeding, or intention of becoming pregnant over time of study procedures; If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study.
- Conditions which may increase the risk of induced hypoglycemia such as: known coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, history of any cardiac arrhythmia (benign premature atrial contractions and premature ventricular contractions allowed), history of seizure disorder, history of cerebrovascular event or transient ischemic attack, hypoglycemia-induced migraine within the last 6 months, or neurological disease.
- Cystic fibrosis
- A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples:
- Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months for either the subject or the subject's diabetes care partner
- Presence of a known adrenal disorder
- Abnormal liver function tests (transaminase \>3 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function
- Abnormal renal function test results (estimated Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m2); testing required for subjects with diabetes duration of greater than 5 years post onset of puberty
- Active gastroparesis
- If on antihypertensive, thyroid, anti-depressant or lipid lowering medication, lack of stability on the medication for the past 2 months prior to enrollment in the study
- Uncontrolled thyroid disease (TSH undetectable or \>10 mIU/L); testing required within 3 months prior to admission for subjects with a goiter, positive antibodies, or who are on thyroid hormone replacement, and within one year otherwise
- Current or recent abuse of alcohol or recreational drugs by patient history
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Virginialead
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)collaborator
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
- TypeZero Technologies, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Related Publications (1)
Anderson SM, Buckingham BA, Breton MD, Robic JL, Barnett CL, Wakeman CA, Oliveri MC, Brown SA, Ly TT, Clinton PK, Hsu LJ, Kingman RS, Norlander LM, Loebner SE, Reuschel-DiVirglio S, Kovatchev BP. Hybrid Closed-Loop Control Is Safe and Effective for People with Type 1 Diabetes Who Are at Moderate to High Risk for Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jun;21(6):356-363. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0018. Epub 2019 May 16.
PMID: 31095423RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
CGM data were missing for 2 of the 44 subjects (1 control and 1 experimental) and outcomes could not be reliably computed. Therefore, 42 subjects were included in the final analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director
- Organization
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stacey M. Anderson, MD
UVA Center for Diabetes Technology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce Buckingham, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2014
First Posted
November 27, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 7, 2022
Results First Posted
October 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- After publication of the primary manuscript, published in Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics, Volume 21, Number 6, 2019
- Access Criteria
- Study outcomes are presented in the primary manuscript. Raw data can be shared via data sharing agreement, as described in the Data Sharing Plan.
NIH's Data Sharing Policy on sharing research resources for research purposes to the scientific community will be followed. Data will be stored in a Data Archive Database includes CGM-insulin delivery time series, meal content, boluses, \& exercise will be deidentified \& retrievable only by subject ID number. The data's real value lies in their precise time stamps - each reading is coded by date \& time which makes possible the data to be related to the subjects' daily routine. Individual patterns of demographic \& insulin treatment parameters leave open a remote possibility of deductive disclosure of subjects with unusual characteristics. Data can be made available only under a Data-Sharing Agreement that includes: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes \& not to identify participants; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; \& (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.