Comparing Powered Ported Bone Marrow Aspiration to Manual Standard Bone Marrow Aspiration Procedures
A Study Comparing Powered Ported Bone Marrow Aspiration Procedures to Manual Standard Bone Marrow Aspiration Procedures Using Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This single center study will compare the manual standard bone marrow aspiration device to the powered ported bone marrow aspiration device for use in the iliac crest in healthy adult volunteers. The study will evaluate the subjects' perceived level of pain, time to sample acquisition, and quality of specimen yield of these devices. Each subject will receive bilateral bone marrow aspiration procedures using both the manual standard and powered ported devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy
Started Dec 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 29, 2026
CompletedMay 29, 2026
December 1, 2016
Same day
November 17, 2014
April 7, 2026
May 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quality of Aspirate Specimen Yield Total Score -Jamshidi Manual Standard Device
The Quality of Aspirate Specimen Yield Total Score is a sum score using the 3 quality rating scales below. The Score range: 0 to 8; Higher scores mean greater quality. Direct Smears- Cellularity: 0= obviously dilute, no good particles or adequate megakaryocytes (MK) 1. probably slightly dilute, particles and MK present 2. cellular, good particles; MK present on edge, smears reflect clot section cellularity Particle Crush Smears: Evaluate presence of particles and quality of cellularity: 0= no particles 1. few particles; difficult to evaluate marrow cellularity and adequacy of MK 2. good particles; adequate material to evaluate MK 3. many particles, some large, with MK easily evaluated Clot Sections: Evaluate quantity and quality of particles 0= insufficient or no particles for interpretation 1. few small particles; difficult to determine cellularity 2. several particles, good marrow cellularity 3. numerous particles (some large); easy to assess cellularity and cell composition
analyzed and results received within 30 days of Day 1 procedures
Quality of Aspirate Specimen Yield Total Score -OnControl Power Ported Device
The Quality of Aspirate Specimen Yield Total Score is a sum score using the 3 quality rating scales below. The Score range: 0 to 8; Higher scores mean greater quality. Direct Smears- Cellularity: 0= obviously dilute, no good particles or adequate megakaryocytes (MK) 1. probably slightly dilute, particles and MK present 2. cellular, good particles; MK present on edge, smears reflect clot section cellularity Particle Crush Smears: Evaluate presence of particles and quality of cellularity: 0= no particles 1. few particles; difficult to evaluate marrow cellularity and adequacy of MK 2. good particles; adequate material to evaluate MK 3. many particles, some large, with MK easily evaluated Clot Sections: Evaluate quantity and quality of particles 0= insufficient or no particles for interpretation 1. few small particles; difficult to determine cellularity 2. several particles, good marrow cellularity 3. numerous particles (some large); easy to assess cellularity and cell composition
analyzed and results received within 30 days of Day 1 procedures
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Level of Pain With Needle Insertion- Jamshidi Manual Standard Device
Day 1 at time of procedure
Level of Pain With Needle Insertion- OnControl Power Ported Device
Day 1 at time of procedure
Level of Pain With Aspiration - Jamshidi Manual Standard Device
1 Day at time of the procedure
Level of Pain With Aspiration - OnControl Power Ported Device
1 Day at time of the procedure
Time to Insertion - Jamshidi Manual Standard Device
1 Day, during procedure
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1: First Procedure: Jamshidi Manual Standard Device
OTHERThe Jamshidi manual standard device procedure will be performed first. The OnControl Powered Ported device procedure will be performed second.
Group 2: First Procedure OnControl Powered Ported Device
OTHERThe OnControl power ported device procedure will be performed first. The Jamshidi manual standard device procedure will be performed second.
Interventions
Jamshidi Manual Standard Device
OnControl Powered Ported Device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 21 years of age and over
- Able to lay flat in prone position on a table for up to 1 hour
- Self-reported as healthy, as confirmed by the investigator during the medical history review and physical examination
- Female subjects with a negative urine pregnancy test at screening visit
You may not qualify if:
- Reported fever within 7 days of the screening visit
- Reported active infection within 7 days of the screening visit
- Fever on day of study procedure
- Signs/symptoms of active infection on day of study procedure
- Imprisoned
- Self identified as pregnant or lactating
- Cognitively impaired
- Patients with one or more conditions precluding bone marrow aspiration
- Excessive tissue and/or absence of adequate anatomical landmarks in target bone
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Unable to lay flat in prone position
- Prothrombin time and International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) results outside of normal range on screening lab work and deemed clinically significant by the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical Therapy and Research LLC.
San Antonio, Texas, 78217, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Tatiana Puga
- Organization
- Teleflex
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2014
First Posted
November 24, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Results First Posted
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2016-12