NCT02383420

Brief Summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the imaging performance of the Carestream PRO 3543 Detector and Carestream PRO 3543C Detector (referred to as the "investigational devices") as compared to the currently marketed Carestream DRX-1 Detector (referred to as the "predicate device"). Both detectors are flat panel digital imaging devices. The results of this study will be included in a Traditional 510(k) FDA Submission to obtain clearance to market the new detectors in the US. The study was designed in accordance with the FDA Guidance titled "Guidance for the Submission of 510(k)'s for Solid State X-ray Imaging Devices", issued on August 6, 1999.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2015

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2015

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 15, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 15, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 4, 2015

Results QC Date

November 20, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Radlex Scale for Diagnostic Capability Ratings

    1-Non-diagnostic Unacceptable for diagnostic purposes. Little or no clinically usable diagnostic information (e.g., gross underexposure, system failure or extensive motion artifact). Almost all such imaging should be repeated. 2-Limited Acceptable, with some technical defect (motion artifact, body habitus/poor x-ray penetration, or patient positioning may limit visualization of some body-regions but still adequate for diagnostic purposes). Not as much diagnostic information as is typical for an examination of this type, but likely sufficient. 3-Diagnostic Image quality that would be expected routinely when imaging cooperative patients. 4-Exemplary Good, most adequate for diagnostic purposes. Image quality that can serve as an example that should be emulated.

    9 weeks after last x-ray capture

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pair Preference Rating Scale

    9 weeks after last x-ray capture

Study Arms (3)

Predicate & Invest-GOS

EXPERIMENTAL

Radiation - Each subject will receive one x-ray using the predicate detector and one x-ray using the GOS investigational detector.

Radiation: Radiation

Predicate & Invest-CsI

EXPERIMENTAL

Radiation - Each subject will receive one x-ray using the predicate detector and one x-ray using the CsI investigational detector.

Radiation: Radiation

Predicate & Invest.-Cadavers GOS & CsI

EXPERIMENTAL

Radiation - Multiple exams (head, chest, legs, etc) were made on the cadavers. Each exam area received one x-ray using the predicate detector and two x-rays using both the GoS and the CsI investigational detector.

Radiation: Radiation

Interventions

RadiationRADIATION

Live subjects will receive two x-rays, one with predicate detector and one using the GOS or CsI investigational detector. Multiple exams (head, chest, legs, etc) were made on the cadavers. Each exam area received one x-ray using the predicate detector and two x-rays using both the GoS and the CsI investigational detector.

Predicate & Invest-CsIPredicate & Invest-GOSPredicate & Invest.-Cadavers GOS & CsI

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • X-ray images of nearly identical positioning and exposure
  • No visible image artifacts
  • Subject 21 years or older
  • Subject has provided informed consent
  • Subject is in good general health (is able to be still to reduce the potential of motion in the images)
  • Subject is able to stand for two (2) x-rays

You may not qualify if:

  • Images that are not clinically acceptable for clinical radiographic reading as determined by the Principal Investigator.
  • Subject is pregnant or suspicious of being pregnant
  • Subject not able or willing to provide Informed Consent, or consent is withdrawn
  • Not able to collect all required case information
  • Subject has a history of high radiation exposure:
  • Subject has undergone radiation therapy
  • Subject has had two (2) or more CT scans within the past year

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, 14642, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Radiation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical Phenomena

Results Point of Contact

Title
Susan Pate, Senior Clinical Affairs Manager
Organization
Carestream Health, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Susan Hobbs, MD

    University of Rochester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2015

First Posted

March 9, 2015

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion

April 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 15, 2016

Results First Posted

April 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2015-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations