Effect of Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Language Control
Role of Executive Function on Language: an Experimental and Clinical Approach With Application to Mother Language and Second Language
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effect of stimulation of prefrontal regions on language performance (e.g. word translation and picture naming). During the language tests, cortical activity will be registered using electroencephalography (EEG) which will provide supplementary information about the cerebral processus involved in language production and management of two languages in bilingual subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedMay 1, 2018
April 1, 2018
1 year
October 8, 2014
April 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in language performance using behavioural measures
Modifications in language performance using behavioural measures (response reaction time and response accuracy) caused by tDCS.
Starting October 2014 up to 36 months
Changes in language performance using EEG data
Modifications in language performance using EEG data (e.g. modification in waveforms and topographic maps at 250-300 ms time-window after the presentation of stimuli) caused by tDCS.
Starting October 2014 up to 36 months
Study Arms (2)
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stim.
ACTIVE COMPARATORTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation Anodal (A-tDCS): Active anodal electrode over F3 (EEG system) and return electrode over right supraorbital area. A 1.5mA current will flow between the electrodes for 20 min. To decrease current-induced injuries, at the beginning the current reaches from 0 to 1.5mA during 30 seconds (fade-in), and decreases from 1.5mA to 0 in 15 seconds at the end (fade-out).
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stim.
SHAM COMPARATORTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation Sham: The parameters mimics the A-tDCS (electrode placement, fade-in and current intensity), except the stimulation duration: the current will reach 1.5mA in 30 sec (fade-in) and lasts only for 30 sec (to give the initial sensation of stimulation). After the stimulation, language performance and EEG will be recorded. Order of interventions (anodal - sham) will be randomised across subjects.
Interventions
We will use a non-invasive, reversible transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using a low-intensity electrical current. We will use Anodal and Sham tDCS. * Anodal: Active anodal electrode over F3 (EEG system) and return electrode over right supraorbital area. A 1.5mA current will flow between the electrodes for 20min. To decrease current-induced injuries, at the beginning, the current reaches from 0 to 1.5mA during 30 seconds (fade-in), and decreases from 1.5mA to 0 in 15 seconds at the end (fade-out). * Sham: The parameters mimics the A-tDCS (i.e. electrode placement, fade-in and current intensity), except the duration of stimulation: the current will reach to 1.5mA in 30 seconds (fade-in) and lasts only for 30 seconds (to give the initial sensation of stimulation).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects
- years old
- Right-handed
- French as their mother tongue and intermediate level in English.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of unstable medical condition (e.g. active epilepsy with seizure in the last 2 years)
- Developmental problem of language
- Metallic head implants
- Scalp skin lesions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Fribourglead
- Swiss National Science Foundationcollaborator
- University of Berncollaborator
- University of Geneva, Switzerlandcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Fribourg
Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jean-Marie Annoni, MD
University of Fribourg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2014
First Posted
November 13, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04