Interval Versus Continuous Training in Healthy Adults
Effects of a High-intensity Interval Training Program Compared to a Moderate Intensity Program in Adults 18-44 Years
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aerobic exercise produces increases in cardiorespiratory fitness (CF), which constitute a protective factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Therefore, aerobic exercise is a key strategy to promoting cardiovascular. There is some evidence that aerobic high intensity interval training may lead to greater increases in CF compared with continuous moderate-intensity training. The main objective of this study is to examine the effects of an aerobic high intensity training program versus a continuous moderate intensity training program on CF in men 18 to 44 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedJune 24, 2016
June 1, 2016
1.2 years
November 4, 2014
June 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in maximal oxygen uptake
Baseline and 8-weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in systolic blood pressure
Baseline and 8-weeks
Change in diastolic blood pressure
Baseline and 8-weeks
Study Arms (2)
Aerobic interval training
EXPERIMENTALInterval exercise at an intensity between 90-95% of maximum heart rate (15x30 s), with recoveries at an equivalent speed to 50-55 % of maximal oxygen consumption at baseline (14x60 s). 24 training sessions, 3x weekly (on alternate days).
Continuous training
ACTIVE COMPARATOR40 minutes of continuous exercise at an intensity between 65-75% of maximum heart rate. 24 training sessions, 3x weekly (on alternate days).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Perform aerobic exercise maximum 3 sessions per week
You may not qualify if:
- Currently participating in an aerobic high intensity training program
- Smoker
- History of cardiovascular disease
- History of coronary heart disease
- Arrhythmias
- Heart failure/insufficiency
- Hypertension
- Diabetes
- Under medical treatment with anticoagulants, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, bronchodilators, and/or steroids
- Psychological, neuromotor and/or osteo-muscular conditions that may affect participation in an exercise program.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Antioquia
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Related Publications (2)
Arboleda-Serna VH, Feito Y, Patino-Villada FA, Vargas-Romero AV, Arango-Velez EF. Effects of high-intensity interval training compared to moderate-intensity continuous training on maximal oxygen consumption and blood pressure in healthy men: A randomized controlled trial. Biomedica. 2019 Sep 1;39(3):524-536. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.4451.
PMID: 31584766DERIVEDArboleda Serna VH, Arango Velez EF, Gomez Arias RD, Feito Y. Effects of a high-intensity interval training program versus a moderate-intensity continuous training program on maximal oxygen uptake and blood pressure in healthy adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Aug 18;17:413. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1522-y.
PMID: 27538896DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Víctor H Arboleda, MSc
Associate Professor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elkin F Arango, MD. MSc
Associate Professor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rubén D Gómez, PhD. MD
Professor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yuri Feito, PhD
Assistant Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2014
First Posted
November 11, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06