NCT02285933

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of 10 to 12 sessions of sitting balance exercises using virtual reality training will provide additional gains in balance ability and function over standard inpatient rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
76

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2017

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

strokephysical therapy specialtyexercise therapyvirtual realityman-machine systemsrandomized control trialinpatientsrehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in the Function In Sitting Test (FIST) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions

    assesses static, dynamic and reactional sitting balance

    baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments

  • Change in the Function In Sitting Test (FIST) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment

    assesses static, dynamic and reactional sitting balance

    baseline,1 month after second assessment

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Change in the Ottawa Sitting Scale (OSS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions

    baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments

  • Change in the Ottawa Sitting Scale (OSS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment

    baseline, 1 month after second assement

  • Change in Limits of stability in sitting (LoS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions

    before treatment, immediately after 10-12 treatments

  • Change in Limits of stability in sitting (LoS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment

    baseline, 1 month after second assement

  • Change in Postural sway in sitting from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions

    baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

VRT

EXPERIMENTAL

sitting balance exercises delivered via virtual reality training

Other: virtual reality training

control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

virtual reality training requiring limited arm movements and no challenge to sitting balance

Other: control

Interventions

Each participant will engage in 10-12 sessions of 30-50 minutes each of virtual reality training (VRT) using Jintronix Rehabilitation Software and three-dimensional motion capture technology. A camera captures the movements of the participant and allows him or her to control an avatar, which interacts with the game. Exercises challenge sitting balance control, reaching and shifting the base of support; for example, controlling a ball as it rolls down a maze or reaching to put dishes away in a virtual kitchen. The difficulty of the games is monitored to maintain a challenge to sitting balance. The participant sits on a CONFORMat pressure mat which continuously monitors his or her centre of pressure to ensure that the participant is adequately challenged during the VRT.

VRT
controlOTHER

Each participant will engage in 10-12 sessions of 30-50 minutes each of virtual reality training (VRT) using Jintronix Rehabilitation Software and three-dimensional motion capture technology. A camera captures the movements of the participant and allows him or her to control an avatar, which interacts with the game. Control group exercises require limited hand and arm movements; for example, using an arm to move a fish along a simple pathway or using the arms to pop balloons without reaching. Control group participants are strapped into their chair to minimize trunk movement. The participant sits on a CONFORMat pressure mat which continuously monitors his or her centre during the VRT.

control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the left or right cortical or subcortical regions
  • medically stable
  • cannot stand independently for \>1 minute or cannot stand at all
  • can sit for at least 20 minutes with or without trunk support and can sit for at least 1 minute without trunk support
  • able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, orthopedic or neurological condition that precludes exercise of low to moderate intensity
  • vestibular deficits or vertigo
  • seizure activity in the previous 6 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Elisabeth Bruyere Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • McEwen D, Taillon-Hobson A, Bilodeau M, Sveistrup H, Finestone H. Virtual reality exercise improves mobility after stroke: an inpatient randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2014 Jun;45(6):1853-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005362. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

    PMID: 24763929BACKGROUND
  • Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, Bilodeau M, Fergusson D, Levac D, Finestone H. Does the addition of virtual reality training to a standard program of inpatient rehabilitation improve sitting balance ability and function after stroke? Protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2016 Mar 31;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0563-x.

    PMID: 27036515BACKGROUND
  • Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, Bilodeau M, Finestone H. Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Apr 6;18:100563. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100563. eCollection 2020 Jun.

  • Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, Bilodeau M, Yang C, Finestone H. Sitting Balance Exercise Performed Using Virtual Reality Training on a Stroke Rehabilitation Inpatient Service: A Randomized Controlled Study. PM R. 2020 Aug;12(8):754-765. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12331. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hillel M Finestone, MD

    Bruyère Health Research Institute.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Heidi Sveistrup, PhD

    University of Ottawa

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Martin Bilodeau, PhD

    University of Ottawa

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Stroke Rehabilitation Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2014

First Posted

November 7, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 30, 2017

Last Updated

April 12, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

As this is not part of a larger, multi-centre trial, we do not plan to share our data.

Locations