A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment Among College Students
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,149
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Eating disorders (EDs) have the highest rate of mortality of any mental illness. On U.S. college campuses, an estimated 80% students with clinically significant ED symptoms do not receive treatment. There are likely more than one million students whose EDs go untreated in any given year. Left untreated EDs typically become more severe and refractory to treatment. Given the impact of EDs on mental and physical health and the connection therein with social, academic, and economic outcomes, an effective intervention to increase rates of treatment utilization would have broad societal effects extending well beyond the campus setting. This study is an online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated EDs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedMay 28, 2015
May 1, 2015
4 months
November 3, 2014
May 27, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Help-seeking behavior (Use of services (e.g., counseling/therapy) for eating and body image issues)
Use of services (e.g., counseling/therapy) for eating and body image issues
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Predictors of help-seeking behavior (e.g., perceived need/urgency, knowledge, attitudes, intentions to seek help)
12 weeks
Study Arms (8)
A (opt-out, loss, social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, loss, social norming).
B (opt-out, gain, social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, gain, social norming).
C (opt-out, loss, no social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, loss, no social norming).
D (opt-out, gain, no social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, gain, no social norming).
E (opt-in, loss, social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, loss, social norming).
F (opt-in, gain, social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, gain, social norming).
G (opt-in, loss, no social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, loss, no social norming).
H (opt-in, gain, no social norming)
EXPERIMENTALStudents in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms. The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, gain, no social norming).
Interventions
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergraduate at participating university
- Untreated symptoms of an eating disorder (as identified in an online screen)
You may not qualify if:
- Less than 18 years of age
- Studying abroad during study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104, United States
Bard College
Annandale-on-Hudson, New York, 12504, United States
Appalachian State University
Boone, North Carolina, 28608, United States
Mercyhurst University
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16546, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah K Lipson, MEd
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Candidate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2014
First Posted
November 6, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05