NCT02277496

Brief Summary

The project is designed to evaluate a participatory implementation model in HealthCorps (HC) high schools and to assess outcomes within and across school settings . The behavioral objectives from the 2010 Dietary Guidelines to address obesity in youth include: 1) decreasing sugary beverage intake; 2) increasing frequency of breakfast; 3) increasing vegetable and fruit intake to 2½ cups per day;4) decreasing frequency of fast food meals;5) becoming physically active (goal of 1 hour per day); and 6) reducing sedentary behavior time (\<2 hour day). The study is employing system dynamics modeling (SDM) to assess wellness programming options and to evaluate the program implementation within the context of diverse school ecologies. The RE-AIM evaluation metric (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) is used to guide SDM development and validation. The Specific Aims are:

  1. 1.To use PAR (Participatory Action Research) methods to refine the school wellness program model and toolkit components that address institutional/community level program implementation barriers and individual level barriers to achieving healthy lifestyle recommendations.
  2. 2.To assess the effectiveness of program components using process evaluation techniques guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) model.
  3. 3.To evaluate implementation with system dynamics modeling to facilitate dissemination. The simulation analysis will apply the RE-AIM framework to address: Reach (participation rates), effectiveness (outcomes), adoption (acceptability), implementation (intervention fidelity), and maintenance (sustainability of lifestyle changes by students and programs by schools), in order to facilitate refining the toolkits and training program for dissemination to other school setting and diverse educational venues.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14,520

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2014

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Key Behaviors

    The primary dependent variables will be the following key behaviors: physical activity, sugary beverage consumptions, fruit and vegetable consumptions and breakfast eating. Scores of these primary study outcomes will be measured annually by administering the high school survey and analyzed cross-sectionally.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Effect of weight changes

    12 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Effects of Goal Setting

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

HC toolkit intervention students

EXPERIMENTAL

HC students will receiveeExperimental wellness education via a toolkit approach to address the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for reducing obesity in youth. The specific recommendations include: 1) reducing intake of sugary beverages, 2) increasing intake of fruits and vegetables, 3) increasing frequency of eating breakfast, 4) decreasing fast and junk food choices, 5) increasing physical activity to 1 hour/day, and 6) decreasing screen time to 2 hours per day.

Behavioral: Toolkit Intervention

Comparison Schools

NO INTERVENTION

During the 2014-2015 school year, control schools were utilized to compare outcomes.

Interventions

The toolkit intervention consists of strategies and activities to engage students (student toolkit) and school wellness councils (school toolkit) in addressing the six targeted behaviors of the 2010 Dietary Guidelines based on the principles of participatory action research. The intervention will promote goal setting and school-based food and physical promotion activities led by students as well as school wellness network development.

Also known as: Student and School Toolkits
HC toolkit intervention students

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 20 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Students (grades 9-12).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Heo M, Jimenez CC, Lim J, Isasi CR, Blank AE, Lounsbury DW, Fredericks L, Bouchard M, Faith MS, Wylie-Rosett J. Effective nationwide school-based participatory extramural program on adolescent body mass index, health knowledge and behaviors. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0975-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OverweightObesity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Judith Wylie-Rosett, EdD, RD

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: During the 2014-2015 school year a 2-arm design was used to compare outcomes between intervention and comparison schools. Subsequent years utilized a single-arm design to analyse trends between and within intervention schools only.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2014

First Posted

October 29, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 30, 2018

Study Completion

June 30, 2018

Last Updated

December 4, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations