NCT02264665

Brief Summary

A descriptive, prospective (partly retrospective), multisite, observational study conducted in France in adult patients treated for a well differentiated, unresectable or metastatic, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with disease progression.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

35 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 15, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 12, 2015

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 18, 2019

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 13, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 13, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

September 2, 2014

Results QC Date

December 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 9, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 2 Years Assessed by Investigator Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1 - Based on Type of Treatment at Inclusion

    PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of start of treatment (the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to first documentation of disease progression (PD) or date of death due to any cause, when receiving the main treatment at the time of inclusion. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study treatment (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of 1 or more new target or non-target lesions. If a participant did not have an event, data censoring was done at the last recorded time to PD or the last tumor assessment, last disease assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

    At 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • PFS at 2 Years Assessed by Investigator Per RECIST v1.1 - Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatments Group at Inclusion

    PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of start of treatment (the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to first documentation of PD or date of death due to any cause, when receiving the main treatment at the time of inclusion. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study treatment (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of 1 or more new target or non-target lesions. If a participant did not have an event, data censoring was done at the last recorded time to PD or the last tumor assessment, last disease assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

    At 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 2 Years - Based on Type of Treatment at Inclusion

    OS was the percentage of participants who were alive at 2 years of prospective follow-up. OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of start of treatment (of the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to the date of death due to any cause. Participants with no event or lost to follow-up or alive at the end of the study were censored at their last follow-up date (last follow-up date or last news). Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

    At 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • OS Rate at 2 Years- Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatments Group at Inclusion

    OS was the percentage of participants who were alive at 2 years of prospective follow-up. OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of start of treatment (of the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to the date of death due to any cause. Participants with no event or lost to follow-up or alive at the end of the study were censored at their last follow-up date (last follow-up date or last news). Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

    At 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants With Reasons for Temporary and Permanent Treatment Discontinuation - Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatment Group at Inclusion

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment Related AEs, SAEs and SAEs With Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (CTCAE) 3, 4 and 5, v4.0-Based on Treatment Received At-least Once During Study

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: any AE, regardless of dose, that: led to death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization; led to persistent or significant incapacity or led to congenital anomaly or birth defect. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in participant who received study drug. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator. Per CTCAE 4.0, Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4=Life-threatening events Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE. Participants in this outcome measure were grouped according to type of treatment received at least once during study irrespective of treatment they initiated or were receiving at time of inclusion.

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment - Based on Treatment Received At-least Once During the Study

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants in this outcome measure were grouped according to type of treatment received at least once during study irrespective of treatment they initiated or were receiving at time of inclusion.

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Death - Based on Treatment Received At-least Once During the Study

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Adverse events leading to death are reported in this outcome measure. Participants in this outcome measure were grouped according to type of treatment received at least once during study irrespective of treatment they initiated or were receiving at time of inclusion.

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Mean of Number of Tumor Assessment Visits - Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatments Group at Inclusion

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants According to Frequency of Tumor Assessment Visits - Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatments Group at Inclusion

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants With Different Types of Investigation Used for Tumor Assessment - Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatments Group at Inclusion

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants Who Had a Change in Their Treatment - Based on Targeted Therapy Group and Other Treatments Group at Inclusion

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • Number of Participants According to Number of Changes in Doses of Treatment - Based on Type of Treatment (Everolimus, Sunitinib, Chemotherapy and Somatostatin Analogues) at Inclusion

    During 2 years of prospective follow-up

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Sunitinib

Drug: sunitinib

Afinitor

Drug: everolimus

other treatment (chémotherapy, SSA..)

Drug: chemotherapies recommended in france

Interventions

sunitinib 37.5mg/d orally

Sunitinib

everolimus 10mg/d orally

Afinitor

depends on the chemotherapy prescribed (IV)

other treatment (chémotherapy, SSA..)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with progressive, metastatic or unresectable, and well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years of age;
  • Patients treated with a targeted therapy (sunitinib, everolimus) or with other treatments (interferon, or metabolic radiotherapy, or chemotherapy or somatostatin analog)\* for:
  • A histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor;
  • Well-differentiated;
  • Progressive prior to initiation of treatment in the investigator's judgment (clinical or radiological progression);
  • Patients who have been informed of the conditions of the study and who have signed the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma or an adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma.
  • Patients receiving targeted therapy (everolimus or sunitinib) already received in a previous line of treatment (rechallenged patient).
  • Patients refusing to give consent.
  • Patients receiving a fifth line or subsequent line of systemic treatment.
  • Patients participating in a clinical trial in a treatment arm not validated by the MA and the TNCD according to the version dated December 2013.
  • Patients randomized to the placebo arm of a placebo-controlled trial or to a double-blind trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (35)

CHU d'Amiens

Amiens, 80054, France

Location

CHU d'Angers

Angers, 49100, France

Location

Hopital Saint-Andre

Bordeaux, 33000, France

Location

CHU de Caen

Caen, 14000, France

Location

Cabinet Medical

Challes-les-Eaux, 73190, France

Location

CHRU de Tours - Hôpital TROUSSEAU

Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170, France

Location

Hopital d'Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France

Location

Hopital du Bocage

Dijon, 21079, France

Location

Unite d'Oncologie Digestive, Departement d'HGE

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, 59020, France

Location

Chu Dupuytren Service Oncologie

Limoges, 87000, France

Location

CH Bretagne Sud

Lorient, 56100, France

Location

Hopital Edouard Herriot - Pavillon H - Service d'oncologie digestive

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

Hopital Edouard Herriot - Service d'Oncologie Digestive, Pavillon H

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

Hopital Edouard Herriot, Pavillion O, Oncologie Medicale

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

Hopital La Timone Service de Gastroenterologie et Oncologie Digestive

Marseille, 13005, France

Location

CHR d'Annecy

Metz-Tessy, 74370, France

Location

Centre Val D'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque

Montpellier, 34298, France

Location

CRLC Val d'Aurelle

Montpellier, 34298, France

Location

Hopital de LA Source, Centre Hospitalier Regional

Orléans, 45067, France

Location

CH Pitie Salpetriere

Paris, 75013, France

Location

Hopital Cochin

Paris, 75014, France

Location

Groupe Hospitalier Cochin

Paris, 75679, France

Location

Hopital Saint Jean

Perpignan, 66046, France

Location

Hôpital Haut Lévèque

Pessac, 33600, France

Location

Hopital de Cornouaille

Quimper, 29107, France

Location

C.H.U. de Reims - Hôpital Robert Debré

Reims, 51092, France

Location

Hopital Robert Debre, Service D'Hepato-gastro-enterolo

Reims, 51092, France

Location

Clinique Armoricaine

Saint-Brieuc, France

Location

Pôle Hospitalier Mutualiste

Saint-Nazaire, 44600, France

Location

Clinique Mutualiste de l'estuaire

Saint-Nazaire, 44606, France

Location

CHU de Strasbourg - Hopital de Hautepierre / Service de Medecine Interne et Nutrition

Strasbourg, 67098, France

Location

Hopital Foch, Onco Hermatologie

Suresnes, 92151, France

Location

Cabinet Medical

Vannes, 56000, France

Location

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, 94805, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Smith D, Lepage C, Vicaut E, Dominguez S, Coriat R, Dubreuil O, Lecomte T, Baudin E, Venat Bouvet L, Samalin E, Santos A, Borie O, Bisot-Locard S, Goichot B, Lombard-Bohas C. Observational Study in a Real-World Setting of Targeted Therapy in the Systemic Treatment of Progressive Unresectable or Metastatic Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNETs) in France: OPALINE Study. Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2731-2748. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02103-7. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Adenoma, Islet Cell

Interventions

SunitinibEverolimus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PyrrolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingSirolimusMacrolidesLactonesOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2014

First Posted

October 15, 2014

Study Start

May 12, 2015

Primary Completion

November 18, 2019

Study Completion

November 18, 2019

Last Updated

November 13, 2023

Results First Posted

November 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Locations