Double-Blind 2-Site Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for ADHD
2 other identifiers
interventional
144
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Additional treatments with long-term benefit for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are needed; one of the more promising is neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback), which has several randomized controlled trials showing significant benefit, but which are inconclusive because they were not double-blinded; the benefit could have been nonspecific (placebo response). Because of neurofeedback's labor-intensive cost (1 treatment costing as much as a month's medication), It is important to know how much specific benefit it yields. This 2- site placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial is the first to test for a specific benefit of neurofeedback with adequate power, the first designed and implemented collaboratively by experts in neurofeedback, ADHD, and clinical trials, the first to rigorously monitor quality not only of treatment, but also of placebo and blinding, and the first to follow up for 2 years to examine enduring effect; the results, whether positive or negative, will provide evidence for clinical practice and public policy regarding ADHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 29, 2020
September 1, 2020
4.6 years
September 17, 2014
July 6, 2020
September 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Scores of Teacher and Parent Rated Inattentive Symptoms
The primary outcome measure is the composite scores of teacher and parent-rated inattentive symptoms on the Conners-3, rated on a scale of 0-3. Lower scores represent a better outcome, with a maximum score of 3 and a minimum score of 0.
Assessed at Baseline, Mid-treatment (2 months), End-treatment (4 months), at 6 month follow up, at 13 month follow up
Study Arms (2)
Neurofeedback treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe intended treatment is downtraining of theta power and uptraining of beta power for 38 treatments of active NF.
Sham neurofeedback treatment
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants assigned to sham and their trainers will be fed EEG data from pre-recorded files (recorded during live clinical NF) rather than from the participant's live signal. In order to prevent unblinding of experienced NF trainers/technicians, artifacts from the participant's EMG and EOG are blended into the pre-recorded EEG so that the trainer controlling the feedback cannot differentiate between live and simulated data. To insure trainer/technician blindness, the pre-recorded EEG will be 38 consecutive EEGs from the same age-matched clinical case so that EEGs of the sham group will also show "training progress" over successive sessions, like real NF.
Interventions
Each session, the child participates in 5 training tasks. Each task lasts 5 minutes at the beginning and gradually increases to 9 minutes per task over the course of the neurofeedback as the child's attention span improves. We record four results for each of the 5 tasks: 1. The number of half-second periods that they met the reward parameters (i.e. theta mV below threshold; beta mV above threshold) 2. Average voltage of theta waves 3. Average voltage of beta 4. Average ratio of theta to beta power (TBR)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Boys and girls age 7 to 10
- IQ\>80
- diagnosed DSM-5 ADHD inattentive presentation or combined presentation
- an item mean ≥1.5 sd above norms on a 0-3 metric both on parent ratings of either DSM-IV inattentive symptoms or all 18 ADHD symptoms and on teacher ratings of either inattentive symptoms or all 18 ADHD symptoms
- an eyes-open QEEG with theta-beta power ratio \>4.5 at Cz or Fz
You may not qualify if:
- comorbid disorder requiring psychoactive medication other than FDA-approved ADHD medication
- a medical disorder requiring systemic chronic medication with confounding psychoactive effects
- sleep apnea
- restless legs syndrome
- IQ \<80
- plans to move requiring school change during the next 3 months
- plans to start other ADHD treatment in the next 3 months
- antipsychotic agent in the 6 months prior to baseline assessment
- fluoxetine in the 4 weeks prior to baseline
- other psychiatric medication in the two weeks prior to baseline
- \>5 previous NF treatments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ohio State Universitylead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
- University of North Carolinacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of North Carolina at Asheville
Asheville, North Carolina, 28804, United States
The Ohio State University Nisonger Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43215, United States
Related Publications (5)
Ging-Jehli NR, Painter QA, Kraemer HA, Roley-Roberts ME, Panchyshyn C, deBeus R, Arnold LE. A diffusion decision model analysis of the cognitive effects of neurofeedback for ADHD. Neuropsychology. 2024 Feb;38(2):146-156. doi: 10.1037/neu0000932. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
PMID: 37971859DERIVEDGing-Jehli NR, Kraemer HC, Eugene Arnold L, Roley-Roberts ME, deBeus R. Cognitive markers for efficacy of neurofeedback for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - personalized medicine using computational psychiatry in a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2023 Mar;45(2):118-131. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2206637. Epub 2023 May 8.
PMID: 37157126DERIVEDRoley-Roberts ME, Pan X, Bergman R, Tan Y, Hendrix K, deBeus R, Kerson C, Arns M, Ging Jehli NR, Connor S, Schrader C, Arnold LE. For Which Children with ADHD is TBR Neurofeedback Effective? Comorbidity as a Moderator. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2023 Jun;48(2):179-188. doi: 10.1007/s10484-022-09575-x. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
PMID: 36526924DERIVEDNeurofeedback Collaborative Group. Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: 25-Month Follow-up of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;62(4):435-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.862. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
PMID: 36521694DERIVEDNeurofeedback Collaborative Group. Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13-Month Follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;60(7):841-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.906. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
PMID: 32853703DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study tested only one of the standard ADHD protocols, theta-beta NF. Results cannot be generalized to the other standard protocols of slow cortical potential (SCP) and sensory-motor rhythm (SMR) neurofeedback, nor fMRI neurofeedback.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. L Eugene Arnold
- Organization
- Ohio State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
L. Eugene Arnold, MD, MEd
The Ohio State University Nisonger Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roger deBeus, Ph.D.
University of North Carolina at Asheville
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2014
First Posted
September 29, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 29, 2020
Results First Posted
September 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share