A Clinical Trial With a New Needle Device Comparing Two Needles for EUS_FNA of Solid Lesions.
EUS-FNA
A Randomized Clinical Trial With a New Needle Device Comparing 25G and 22G Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-needle Aspiration of Solid Lesions.
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is a reliable, safe, and effective technique for obtaining samples from the GI wall lesions and from organs adjacent to the GI tract (pancreas, nodes...).Needles available for EUS-FNA include 25G, 22G and 19G. Some studies have suggested that the 25G needle could be equal or even better than the 22G needle. The BXN system and neddles are is a newly developed for EUS-FNA. This trial is developed for testing the accuracy of the new neddle system for EUS-FNA and for comparing the two needles types, 25G and 22G.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
Started Aug 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 22, 2014
September 1, 2014
1.2 years
September 1, 2014
September 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical performance of 22G and 25G needles
Evaluation of whether enough material for adequate cytological/histological analysis can obtained with equal efficacy with the 25G and the 22G needles. The percentages of adequate samples obtained.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Ease of needle pass
18 months
Needle malfunction
18 months
Number of passes
18 months
Number of crossovers
18 months
Major complications
18 months
Study Arms (2)
25G needle
EXPERIMENTALAll consecutive patients that will be referred for solid masses to be aspirated will be randomized to be targeted in the 25G needle arm (A), or in the 22G needle arm (B).
22G needle
EXPERIMENTALAll consecutive patients that will be referred for solid masses to be aspirated will be randomized to be targeted in the 25G needle arm (A), or in the 22G needle arm (B).
Interventions
All consecutive patients that will be referred for solid masses to be aspirated will be randomized to be targeted in the 25G needle arm (A), or in the 22G needle arm (B).
All consecutive patients that will be referred for solid masses to be aspirated will be randomized to be targeted in the 25G needle arm (A), or in the 22G needle arm (B).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- endosonographic appearance of a solid lesions
- age \>18 years
- informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- alteration of the coagulation (INR \>1.5, PLT \<50 x 103 /µL)
- inability to express consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Azzolini F, Iori V, Cavina M, Sereni G, Decembrino F, Gallo C, Tamagnini I, Valli R, Piana S, Campari C, Gardini G, Sassatelli R. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):709-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256482. Epub 2011 May 24.
PMID: 21611946BACKGROUNDSiddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, Padda MS, Murali-Dharan V, Aslanian HR. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1093-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.037. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
PMID: 19640524BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Silvia Carrara, MD
Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano-Milan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2014
First Posted
September 22, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09