Plerixafor Versus G-CSF in the Treatment of People With WHIM Syndrome
A Phase III Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Study of Plerixafor Versus G-CSF in the Treatment of Patients With WHIM Syndrome.
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: \- WHIMS (Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis Syndrome) is a rare disease. It can cause cancers, infections, and warts. Researchers want to see if a drug called plerixafor can treat WHIMS. Objective: \- To compare plerixafor versus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for preventing infections in people with WHIMS. Eligibility: \- People ages 10-75 with WHIMS who have a CXCR4 gene mutation. Design:
- Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, and blood and urine tests. They may have heart and spleen tests and body scans. They may have samples of skin or warts taken. Researchers may take photographs of warts.
- Participants will start twice daily self-injections of G-CSF. Their doctors will decide the dosage.
- Initial Period (4-12 weeks)
- Participants will:
- continue the injections and their usual antibiotics and/or immunoglobulin
- have blood drawn
- keep a daily health diary
- Participants will visit the clinic for 2 days without injections.
- Adjustment Period 1 (8 weeks):
- Participants will:
- continue twice daily injections from home
- continue the daily health diary
- have blood tests every 2 weeks.
- Treatment Year 1:
- Participants will
- receive either plerixafor or G-CSF injections twice daily
- continue the health diary
- have blood tests every 2 months
- visit the clinic about every 4 months
- At the end of year 1, participants will visit the clinic for an evaluation. They will switch to the other study drug. They will have an 8-week adjustment and 1-year treatment period.
- At the end of year 2, participants will visit the clinic to complete their injections and go back to their previous G-CSF regimen. Participants will continue their daily health diary and have blood tests for 5-6 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 24, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 7, 2023
CompletedApril 7, 2023
March 1, 2021
6 years
September 3, 2014
December 23, 2021
April 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Severity of Infection
The primary outcome is a Total Infection Severity Score (TISS). Each infection during the 12 month period of treatment on each drug was scored for severity on a scale of 1-10 with higher scores representing more severe infections and then these scores were summed (weighted based on time at risk) to create a total infection severity score (TISS) in each period for each participant (range 0 to infinity). Drug failures during a period were pre-defined to count as more extreme than any TISS score. The primary analysis outcome is based on the Difference in Total Infection Severity Score (TISS) in Period 1 minus TISS in Period 2 analysis, with drug failures in only one period assigned the highest absolute value for the difference, with the sign defined according to the treatment order (e.g., negative for period 2 drug failures only). Higher values of the difference represent a worse outcome in the first period than in the second period. Thus, each participant's infection severity
Scores from 12 months treatment on each study drug
Difference in Total Infection Severity Score
The primary outcome is a difference: the Total Infection Severity Score (TISS) in Period 1 minus the TISS in Period 2. Higher values represent a worse outcome in the first period than in the second period. Each infection during the 12 month period of treatment on each drug was scored for severity on a scale of 1-10 with higher scores representing more severe infections and then these individual infection scores were summed (weighted by time at risk) to create a total infection severity score (TISS) in each period. Because there is no pre-determined number of infections, the range is -infinity to +infinity. If a participant has a drug failure in only one period, their difference rank is either the highest rank (if the failure is in Period 1) or the lowest rank (if the failure is in Period 2), failure on both periods gives a difference of 0. 1 subject failed on both treatments, and 3 subjects failed only on plerixafor.
Scores from 12 months treatment on each study drug
Study Arms (2)
Plerixafor first then G-CSF (PG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy drugs were both given subcutaneously twice daily for 14 months using unmarked prefilled glass syringes
G-CSF first then Plerixafor (GP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy drugs were both given subcutaneously twice daily for 14 months using unmarked prefilled glass syringes
Interventions
Twice daily low dose injection for 14 months.
Twice daily low dose injection for 14 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects are eligible to enter the study if they meet all of the following criteria:
- Age greater than or equal to 10 and less than or equal to 75 years.
- Heterozygous mutation in the C-tail of CXCR4 in addition to a clinical diagnosis of WHIMS.
- Documented neutropenia with a baseline ANC below 1500 cells/microL of blood.
- History of severe and/or recurrent infections.
- Willingness to interrupt G-CSF medication, 2 days prior to study drug injection.
- Must have a local medical provider for medical management.
- Must be willing to provide blood, plasma, serum, and DNA samples for storage.
- All study subjects must agree not to become pregnant or impregnate a female. Women of childbearing potential must agree to take appropriate steps to avoid becoming pregnant for the duration of the study. Participants in whom pregnancy is biologically possible must use at least 2 study approved methods of contraception, one of which must be a barrier method, and must continue contraception until 5 months after stopping the study drug:
- Male or female condoms with a spermicide,
- Diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide,
- Intrauterine device,
- Contraceptive pills or patch, Norplant, Depo-Provera or other FDA-approved contraceptive,
- Male partner with vasectomy and documented aspermatogenic sterility.
- Willingness to comply with the study medications, visits, and procedures, as deemed necessary by the principal investigator (PI).
You may not qualify if:
- Neutropenia due to maturation defects in the myeloid lineage or a type of neutropenia, which in the investigator s opinion, is unlikely to improve from the medication administered in this study.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
- Known hypersensitivity to plerixafor, G-CSF, or any components of the products.
- Predisposition to or history of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
- Requiring dialysis or having markedly impaired renal function with a Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) \<15 mL/min.
- Condition that in the investigator s opinion places a subject at undue risk by participating in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (1)
McDermott DH, Velez D, Cho E, Cowen EW, DiGiovanna JJ, Pastrana DV, Buck CB, Calvo KR, Gardner PJ, Rosenzweig SD, Stratton P, Merideth MA, Kim HJ, Brewer C, Katz JD, Kuhns DB, Malech HL, Follmann D, Fay MP, Murphy PM. A phase III randomized crossover trial of plerixafor versus G-CSF for treatment of WHIM syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2023 Oct 2;133(19):e164918. doi: 10.1172/JCI164918.
PMID: 37561579DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Highly variable disease phenotypic expression made crossover design optimal but a placebo arm was not included due to infection risk of severe neutropenia 2. Prophylactic supplemental immunoglobulin and antibiotics were allowed 3. Tolerance of G-CSF was insured prior to randomization but plerixafor was never used before randomization in 17/19 patients, 4. Non-inferiority analysis of primary endpoint was not planned because there were no defined equivalence margins
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David H. McDermott
- Organization
- LMI/NIAID/NIH
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David H McDermott, M.D.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2014
First Posted
September 4, 2014
Study Start
October 14, 2014
Primary Completion
October 8, 2020
Study Completion
February 24, 2021
Last Updated
April 7, 2023
Results First Posted
April 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share