NCT02231879

Brief Summary

Background: \- WHIMS (Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis Syndrome) is a rare disease. It can cause cancers, infections, and warts. Researchers want to see if a drug called plerixafor can treat WHIMS. Objective: \- To compare plerixafor versus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for preventing infections in people with WHIMS. Eligibility: \- People ages 10-75 with WHIMS who have a CXCR4 gene mutation. Design:

  • Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, and blood and urine tests. They may have heart and spleen tests and body scans. They may have samples of skin or warts taken. Researchers may take photographs of warts.
  • Participants will start twice daily self-injections of G-CSF. Their doctors will decide the dosage.
  • Initial Period (4-12 weeks)
  • Participants will:
  • continue the injections and their usual antibiotics and/or immunoglobulin
  • have blood drawn
  • keep a daily health diary
  • Participants will visit the clinic for 2 days without injections.
  • Adjustment Period 1 (8 weeks):
  • Participants will:
  • continue twice daily injections from home
  • continue the daily health diary
  • have blood tests every 2 weeks.
  • Treatment Year 1:
  • Participants will
  • receive either plerixafor or G-CSF injections twice daily
  • continue the health diary
  • have blood tests every 2 months
  • visit the clinic about every 4 months
  • At the end of year 1, participants will visit the clinic for an evaluation. They will switch to the other study drug. They will have an 8-week adjustment and 1-year treatment period.
  • At the end of year 2, participants will visit the clinic to complete their injections and go back to their previous G-CSF regimen. Participants will continue their daily health diary and have blood tests for 5-6 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 3, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 14, 2014

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 8, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 24, 2021

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 7, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

September 3, 2014

Results QC Date

December 23, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

ImmunodeficiencyNeutropeniaMozobilMyelokathexisWarts

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Severity of Infection

    The primary outcome is a Total Infection Severity Score (TISS). Each infection during the 12 month period of treatment on each drug was scored for severity on a scale of 1-10 with higher scores representing more severe infections and then these scores were summed (weighted based on time at risk) to create a total infection severity score (TISS) in each period for each participant (range 0 to infinity). Drug failures during a period were pre-defined to count as more extreme than any TISS score. The primary analysis outcome is based on the Difference in Total Infection Severity Score (TISS) in Period 1 minus TISS in Period 2 analysis, with drug failures in only one period assigned the highest absolute value for the difference, with the sign defined according to the treatment order (e.g., negative for period 2 drug failures only). Higher values of the difference represent a worse outcome in the first period than in the second period. Thus, each participant's infection severity

    Scores from 12 months treatment on each study drug

  • Difference in Total Infection Severity Score

    The primary outcome is a difference: the Total Infection Severity Score (TISS) in Period 1 minus the TISS in Period 2. Higher values represent a worse outcome in the first period than in the second period. Each infection during the 12 month period of treatment on each drug was scored for severity on a scale of 1-10 with higher scores representing more severe infections and then these individual infection scores were summed (weighted by time at risk) to create a total infection severity score (TISS) in each period. Because there is no pre-determined number of infections, the range is -infinity to +infinity. If a participant has a drug failure in only one period, their difference rank is either the highest rank (if the failure is in Period 1) or the lowest rank (if the failure is in Period 2), failure on both periods gives a difference of 0. 1 subject failed on both treatments, and 3 subjects failed only on plerixafor.

    Scores from 12 months treatment on each study drug

Study Arms (2)

Plerixafor first then G-CSF (PG)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study drugs were both given subcutaneously twice daily for 14 months using unmarked prefilled glass syringes

Drug: PlerixaforDrug: G-CSF

G-CSF first then Plerixafor (GP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study drugs were both given subcutaneously twice daily for 14 months using unmarked prefilled glass syringes

Drug: PlerixaforDrug: G-CSF

Interventions

Twice daily low dose injection for 14 months.

Also known as: Mozobil
G-CSF first then Plerixafor (GP)Plerixafor first then G-CSF (PG)
G-CSFDRUG

Twice daily low dose injection for 14 months.

Also known as: Neupogen
G-CSF first then Plerixafor (GP)Plerixafor first then G-CSF (PG)

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects are eligible to enter the study if they meet all of the following criteria:
  • Age greater than or equal to 10 and less than or equal to 75 years.
  • Heterozygous mutation in the C-tail of CXCR4 in addition to a clinical diagnosis of WHIMS.
  • Documented neutropenia with a baseline ANC below 1500 cells/microL of blood.
  • History of severe and/or recurrent infections.
  • Willingness to interrupt G-CSF medication, 2 days prior to study drug injection.
  • Must have a local medical provider for medical management.
  • Must be willing to provide blood, plasma, serum, and DNA samples for storage.
  • All study subjects must agree not to become pregnant or impregnate a female. Women of childbearing potential must agree to take appropriate steps to avoid becoming pregnant for the duration of the study. Participants in whom pregnancy is biologically possible must use at least 2 study approved methods of contraception, one of which must be a barrier method, and must continue contraception until 5 months after stopping the study drug:
  • Male or female condoms with a spermicide,
  • Diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide,
  • Intrauterine device,
  • Contraceptive pills or patch, Norplant, Depo-Provera or other FDA-approved contraceptive,
  • Male partner with vasectomy and documented aspermatogenic sterility.
  • Willingness to comply with the study medications, visits, and procedures, as deemed necessary by the principal investigator (PI).

You may not qualify if:

  • Neutropenia due to maturation defects in the myeloid lineage or a type of neutropenia, which in the investigator s opinion, is unlikely to improve from the medication administered in this study.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  • Known hypersensitivity to plerixafor, G-CSF, or any components of the products.
  • Predisposition to or history of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Requiring dialysis or having markedly impaired renal function with a Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) \<15 mL/min.
  • Condition that in the investigator s opinion places a subject at undue risk by participating in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • McDermott DH, Velez D, Cho E, Cowen EW, DiGiovanna JJ, Pastrana DV, Buck CB, Calvo KR, Gardner PJ, Rosenzweig SD, Stratton P, Merideth MA, Kim HJ, Brewer C, Katz JD, Kuhns DB, Malech HL, Follmann D, Fay MP, Murphy PM. A phase III randomized crossover trial of plerixafor versus G-CSF for treatment of WHIM syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2023 Oct 2;133(19):e164918. doi: 10.1172/JCI164918.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

InfectionsNeutropeniaWartsAgammaglobulinemiaImmunologic Deficiency Syndromes

Interventions

plerixaforGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorFilgrastim

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AgranulocytosisLeukopeniaCytopeniaHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesLeukocyte DisordersPapillomavirus InfectionsDNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesSkin Diseases, ViralTumor Virus InfectionsSkin Diseases, InfectiousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesBlood Protein DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colony-Stimulating FactorsGlycoproteinsGlycoconjugatesCarbohydratesHematopoietic Cell Growth FactorsCytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsProteinsBiological Factors

Limitations and Caveats

1. Highly variable disease phenotypic expression made crossover design optimal but a placebo arm was not included due to infection risk of severe neutropenia 2. Prophylactic supplemental immunoglobulin and antibiotics were allowed 3. Tolerance of G-CSF was insured prior to randomization but plerixafor was never used before randomization in 17/19 patients, 4. Non-inferiority analysis of primary endpoint was not planned because there were no defined equivalence margins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. David H. McDermott
Organization
LMI/NIAID/NIH

Study Officials

  • David H McDermott, M.D.

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2014

First Posted

September 4, 2014

Study Start

October 14, 2014

Primary Completion

October 8, 2020

Study Completion

February 24, 2021

Last Updated

April 7, 2023

Results First Posted

April 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations