Carbetocin Trial: Carbetocin Appropriate Rate Better Equilibrium Between Tonus (TOnus) and CIrculatioN
CARBETOCIN
Double-blind Randomised Non-inferiority Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Carbetocin After Caesarean Section Applied as Iv-bolus as Compared to a Short-infusion
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency and defined as a blood loss of ≥500ml after vaginal birth and ≥1000ml after caesarean section (CS) and/or the need for blood transfusion within 24 hours after delivery (World Health Organization, Recommendations for the Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage. 2007; Leduc et al., J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009). Since PPH is more common after caesarean deliveries than after vaginal births and the rate of CS is rising over time and will probably continue to rise, the incidence of PPH is expected to increase accordingly. A meta-analysis has shown that routine administration of an oxytocic agent after caesarean delivery leads to a reduced blood loss and decreases the risk of PPH (Cotter et al., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001). The two most commonly used oxytocic drugs after operative delivery are oxytocin and carbetocin, a synthetic oxytocin-analogue. Carbetocin has the advantage over oxytocin of having a longer half-life and therefore reducing the use of additional uterotonics. Based on the findings of reduced cardiovascular side-effects with a short-infusion as compared to a bolus injection found for oxytocin (Thomas et al., Br J Anaesth, 2007), our study hypothesis is that a slower administration rate of carbetocin minimises the cardiovascular side effects without compromising the uterine tone. Therefore, we aim to investigate a short infusion of carbetocin 100 mcg applied in 100ml sodium chlorid compared to a bolus application in women undergoing primary or secondary caesarean delivery. This prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial will take place at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. We hypothesize uterine contraction not to be inferior (primary efficacy endpoint) and the mean arterial pressure to be higher after a short-infusion than after a bolus administration (primary safety endpoint).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 9, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.3 years
August 19, 2014
January 8, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximal uterine tone
Uterine tone is assessed by the obstetrician on a linear analogue scale from 0 to 100
within the first 5 minutes after cord clamping
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mean arterial pressure
within first five minutes after cord clamping
Study Arms (2)
Short infusion
EXPERIMENTALCarbetocin 100 microgram will be applied intravenously in a short infusion over about a minute
Bolus application
OTHERCarbetocin 100 microgram will be applied intravenously by bolus application over about 15 seconds
Interventions
Short-infusion of Carbetocin 100 microgram as compared to bolus application of Carbetocin 100 microgram (double dummy method)
Carbetocin 100 microgram given intravenously as a bolus application over about 15 seconds
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy women
- singleton pregnancy
- caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
- older than 18 years
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- emergency caesarean section
- secondary caesarean section due to fetal distress
- comorbidities (cardiovascular, kidney or liver disorder, epilepsy)
- obstetric diseases (hypertension, (pre-)eclampsia)
- uterine malformation (including uterine fibroids)
- bleeding disorder
- known hypersensitivity to carbetocin or oxytocin
- fetal malformation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Dell-Kuster S, Hoesli I, Lapaire O, Seeberger E, Steiner LA, Bucher HC, Girard T. Efficacy and safety of carbetocin given as an intravenous bolus compared with short infusion for Caesarean section - double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):772-780. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex034.
PMID: 28498927DERIVEDDell-Kuster S, Hoesli I, Lapaire O, Seeberger E, Steiner LA, Bucher HC, Girard T. Efficacy and safety of carbetocin applied as an intravenous bolus compared to as a short-infusion for caesarean section: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 22;17:155. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1285-5.
PMID: 27004531DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Salome Dell-Kuster, MD
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2014
First Posted
August 20, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01