Study of Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Diagrams for Sedation in Spinal Anesthesia
2 other identifiers
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To determine the efficacy of sedation schemes to sedation in patients about to undergo spinal anesthesia. Methods: Pilot study, clinical type, randomized, prospective, single-blind, in which the investigators compared three schemes for sedation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Keywords: Anesthesia, Spinal Anesthesia, Conscious Sedation, Operating Rooms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2014
CompletedMay 13, 2014
May 1, 2014
6 months
May 3, 2014
May 8, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sedation level reached according RANSAY SCALE with the use of three schemes sedation to spinal anesthesia
Sedation/Analgesia conscious was considered adequate when a RANSAY 2 or 3 was achieved (BASED ON THE RANSAY SCALE), without the need for other anesthetic drugs are different from the protocol, has been the gold standard in many studies that evaluated sedation; as you increase the level on the scale, increasing the degree of sedation . Being awake patient can be found in a level 1, referring to an anxious and / or agitated patients in level 2, when partner is quiet and focused and have spontaneous eye opening, or a level 3 when has closed eyelids, but quickly responds to verbal stimuli. When the patient was found asleep, level 4 will be called if you are still with closed eyes and responds quickly to tactile and verbal stimuli strong, level 5 when it has a slower response and only responds to important and / or painful stimuli and level 6 when does not respond to any stimulu
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants satisfied with the use of three schemes sedation to spinal anesthesia
one year
Study Arms (3)
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1\. Sedation with Midazolam 0.03 mg / kg, Intravenous, administered as a single dose. Was given to those patients randomly assigned to this group, who were scheduled for procedures previously defined in the inclusion criteria.
Midazolam+Fentanyl Combination
EXPERIMENTAL2\. Sedation with Midazolam 0.015 mg / Kg + Fentanyl 0.8mcg/kg, Intravenous, administered as a single dose. Was given to those patients randomly assigned to this group, who were scheduled for procedures previously defined in the inclusion criteria.
Midazolam+Ketamine Combination
EXPERIMENTAL3\. Sedation with Midazolam 0,015 mg / Kg + ketamine 0.25 mg / kg, Intravenous, administered as a single dose. Was given to those patients randomly assigned to this group, who were scheduled for procedures previously defined in the inclusion criteria.
Interventions
Was applied Midazolam 0.015 mg / Kg + Fentanyl 0.8mcg/kg, IV (in the vein), single dose.
Was applied Midazolam 0,015 mg / Kg + ketamine 0.25 mg / kg, IV (in the vein), single dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for elective surgery
- Have pre-anesthetic assessment
- Be classified according to their risk as ASA I or ASA II
- Having a body mass index between 18.5 and 29.99
- Not be pregnant
- Have a higher fasting 8 hours the day of the procedure
- Require regional anesthetic technique without contraindications to the procedure -Can be performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus
- Have not known history of allergy
You may not qualify if:
- Malformations of the spine column level , that creates a lock troubles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Cartagena
Cartagena, Departamento de Bolívar, 1051, Colombia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
FRANCISCO BERMUDEZ GUERRERO, M.D
Universidad de Cartagena
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist in Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2014
First Posted
May 13, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05