Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Infraclavicular Versus Axillary Approach to Brachial Plexus Block
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Infraclavicular Versus Axillary Approach to Brachial Plexus Block.
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The brachial plexus block is an anesthetic technique often used for surgical procedures of the upper limb. To get the brachial plexus block, several routes can be used, including the axillary and infraclavicular approach. Few studies have compared these techniques, considering the time to perform the block, the onset time and success rate, with conflicting results. Furthermore, there is little information in the literature comparing the length of postoperative analgesia provided by these techniques. Therefore, the investigators designed this study in order to elucidate the differences between these two techniques to assist the anesthesiologist to choose the best of them in clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 5, 2014
August 1, 2014
1.1 years
July 30, 2014
August 2, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postoperative analgesia
All patients will be contacted on the first postoperative day to tell the time of onset of pain postoperatively. The duration of postoperative analgesia is defined as the interval between the end of local anesthetic injection and the onset of postoperative pain reported by the patient.
first postoperative day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
local anesthetic pharmacokinetics
During the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound: Axillary block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the axillary group, the ultrasound probe will be placed upright in the armpit to obtain a cross section of this region. After visualization of the nerves form the brachial plexus by ultrasound, 5 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% will be injected around each nerve to be blocked (median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous). If resistance to the injection of the solution is present or the patient complains of severe pain, the needle will be immediately repositioned.
Ultrasound: Infraclavicular block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the infraclavicular group, the ultrasound probe will be placed in the infraclavicular region (the junction between the clavicle and the coracoid process) to obtain a cross-sectional imaging of the axillary artery. After visualization of the axillary artery by ultrasound, the block will be performed using the technique in plan for visualization of the needle. The needle is placed in position 6-8 hours of the artery, and 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% will be injected, observing a dispersal of local anesthetic around the artery.
Interventions
Ultrasound guided infraclvicular block
20 ml of ropivacaine 0,5% in both groups ( axillary block and infraclavicular block)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age older than 18 years and less than 70 years
- consent informed signed by the patient
- candidates for surgical intervention of scaphoid fractures, distal radius fractures and wrist arthrodesis
- American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I, II and III
- body mass index (BMI) \<35 kg / m².
You may not qualify if:
- cognitive impairment or active psychiatric condition
- infection at the puncture site
- bleeding disorders
- history of allergy to ropivacaine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal University of Sao Paulo - Hospital Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04024002, Brazil
Related Publications (9)
Tran DQ, Russo G, Munoz L, Zaouter C, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary brachial plexus blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):366-71. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ac7d18.
PMID: 19574871BACKGROUNDSong IA, Gil NS, Choi EY, Sim SE, Min SW, Ro YJ, Kim CS. Axillary approach versus the infraclavicular approach in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: comparison of anesthetic time. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;61(1):12-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.1.12. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
PMID: 21860745BACKGROUNDLopez-Morales S, Moreno-Martin A, Leal del Ojo JD, Rodriguez-Huertas F. [Ultrasound-guided axillary block versus ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2013 Jun-Jul;60(6):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 May 15. Spanish.
PMID: 23684374BACKGROUNDKoscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Frederiksen BS, Rasmussen H, Hesselbjerg L. A comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 May;53(5):620-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01909.x.
PMID: 19419356BACKGROUNDOotaki C, Hayashi H, Amano M. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):600-4. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.18184.
PMID: 11097667BACKGROUNDSandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Aug;89(2):254-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef186.
PMID: 12378663BACKGROUNDTran DQ, Clemente A, Tran DQ, Finlayson RJ. A comparison between ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block using the "double bubble" sign and neurostimulation-guided axillary block. Anesth Analg. 2008 Sep;107(3):1075-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ef259.
PMID: 18713932BACKGROUNDArcand G, Williams SR, Chouinard P, Boudreault D, Harris P, Ruel M, Girard F. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):886-890. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159168.69934.CC.
PMID: 16116009BACKGROUNDFerraro LH, Takeda A, dos Reis Falcao LF, Rezende AH, Sadatsune EJ, Tardelli MA. Determination of the minimum effective volume of 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
PMID: 24565388BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Maria Angela Tardelli, PhD
Federal University of São Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2014
First Posted
August 5, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 5, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08