Pulmonary Function and Interscalene Block
Effect of Local Anesthetic Concentration (0.2% Ropivacaine vs 0.1% Ropivacaine) on Phrenic Nerve Function, Pulmonary Function, and Analgesia After Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of our study is to compare the degree of phrenic nerve blockade after interscalene block using 0.1% ropivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine. Our hypothesis is that using a lower concentration of local anesthetic will result in lesser degree of phrenic nerve block. 40 patients will be enrolled. Half will receive the block with 0.1% ropivacaine and half with 0.2% ropivacaine. Phrenic nerve and diaphragm function will be assessed by bedside spirometry and ultrasound visualization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 2, 2018
CompletedFebruary 20, 2019
May 1, 2018
1.6 years
June 6, 2014
August 7, 2017
January 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients With Paradoxical Diaphragmatic Movement
The primary outcome variable is the number of patients with paradoxical diaphragmatic movement ( as an indication for phrenic nerve blockade) as assessed by ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragm
30 minutes after the block
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percentage Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) From Pre-block Value to Value Measures in PACU
within 30 minutes from arrival to PACU
Percentage Change in Forced Expired Volume in First Second (FEV1) After the Block
within 30 minutes from arrival to PACU
Opioid Requirements for 72 Hours After Surgery
72 hours
Study Arms (2)
High concentration group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.2% ropivacaine
Lower concentration group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.1% ropivacaine
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy
- ASA physical status between I-III
- Mentally competent and able to give consent for enrollment in the study -
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are coagulopathic or currently on anticoagulation medication (except for ASA (acetylsalicylic acid) or NSAIDS)
- Patients with severe pulmonary disease such as asthma or COPD or substantial smoking history suggestive of COPD
- Patients with allergy to local anesthetics or other study drugs
- Patients with chronic opiate use
- Patients with known dysfunction of diaphragm, intercostal muscles, or other neuromuscular disorders affecting respiration
- Inability to speak or understand English language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Wong AK, Keeney LG, Chen L, Williams R, Liu J, Elkassabany NM. Effect of Local Anesthetic Concentration (0.2% vs 0.1% Ropivacaine) on Pulmonary Function, and Analgesia After Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Study. Pain Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):2397-2403. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw057. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
PMID: 28025374DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Nabil M Elkassabany
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nabil Elkassabany, MD
University of Pennsylvania, Anesthesia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2014
First Posted
July 3, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 20, 2019
Results First Posted
November 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05