Comparison of Two Rehabilitation Strategies in Patients With Hemiparesis One Year or More After Stroke
NEURORESTORE
2 other identifiers
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the situation of motor limitations that people often experience after stroke, current health systems cannot provide for the daily amount and duration of high intensity muscle stretch and motor training that would be required over protracted periods to involve muscle and brain plasticity. For patients with sufficient cognitive abilities, Guided Self-rehabilitation Contracts allow implementing stretch and training at high intensity and may result in meaningful functional improvement in chronic stages, as long as discipline persists over at least a year span. This single blind control protocol will evaluate Guided Self-rehabilitation Contracts as against conventional therapy in the community, for a one year duration in persons with chronic hemiparesis after stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedJune 20, 2017
June 1, 2017
3.3 years
July 25, 2014
June 19, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional motor recovery assessed by a composite endpoint (one for upper limbs and one for lower limbs)
1. Fast 10-meter barefoot ambulation speed with no assistive device 2. Active upper limb function using the Modified FRENCHAY scale (10 everyday life activities performed live in front of the investigator and videotaped - videos reviewed later by a blinded investigator).
After one year of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Speed, step length and cadence over 10 meters at comfortable speed, barefoot and with shoes, with no assistive device
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
Speed, step length, cadence and physiological cost index over 2 minutes at maximal speed, with shoes
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
Disability Assessment Scale: interview between patient and investigator, assessing the level of disability in 4 domains (dressing, cosmesis, hygiene and pain)
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
Barthel Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Index
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
Euro-Qol - 5 dimension (EQ-5D)
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Evaluation by the occupational therapist of home adaptation and the functioning at home
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
Evaluation by a clinical psychologist of coping with each type of care (guided self-rehabilitation or conventional), of the required psychological resources and the potential need for psychological follow-up.
One assessment visit every 6 month for 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Guided Self-rehabilitation Contract
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Guided Self-rehabilitation Contracts, the therapist acts as a coach, in the sports' sense, providing double guidance: technical, selecting and teaching the required exercises to the patient using infrequent thorough visits, for example every month; Psychological, binding with the patient on the contract. The patient agrees to perform the prescribed daily stretch postures and rapid alternating movements over the long term and to document this work in a written diary.
Conventional rehabilitation
NO INTERVENTIONconventional therapy in the community
Interventions
In Guided Self-rehabilitation Contracts, the therapist acts as a coach, in the sports' sense, providing double guidance: technical, selecting and teaching the required exercises to the patient using infrequent thorough visits, for example every month; Psychological, binding with the patient on the contract. The patient agrees to perform the prescribed daily stretch postures and rapid alternating movements over the long term and to document this work in a written diary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with spastic hemiparesis, following a unique stroke episode over a year before enrollment into the study
- Age ≥ 18
- Barefoot walking possible with no assistive device over 10 m
- Fast barefoot ambulation speed between 0.1 m/sec and 1.3 m/sec
- Mean Modified FRENCHAY Score between 2 and 8/10
- Patient having provided a signed consent to participate in this trial
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple stroke episodes, clinically of based on brain imaging
- No recent (less than 3 months before enrollment) brain imaging (CT scan or MRI) in case of doubt about multiple stroke episodes
- Concurrent severe condition jeopardizing functional or vital prognosis, or the ability to participate in rehabilitation sessions
- Cognitive, phasic or behavioral condition impeding verbal communication, active participation to a rehabilitation or self-rehabilitation program, or participation in a research study, according to the investigator's judgment
- Person having a tutor or benefiting from a law protection order
- Person not benefiting from French State Health Insurance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Henri Mondor Hospital
Créteil, 94010, France
Related Publications (1)
Gracies JM, Pradines M, Ghedira M, Loche CM, Mardale V, Hennegrave C, Gault-Colas C, Audureau E, Hutin E, Baude M, Bayle N; Neurorestore Study Group. Guided Self-rehabilitation Contract vs conventional therapy in chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis: NEURORESTORE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1257-y.
PMID: 30871480DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Michel GRACIES, MD, PhD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2014
First Posted
July 29, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06