Robotic Brace Incorporating Electromyography for Moderate Affected Arm Impairment After Stroke
Robotic Brace Incorporating EMG for Moderate Affected Arm Impairment After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Of the 5.7 million stroke survivors in the United States, up to 80% exhibit significant weakness in one arm (called "hemiparesis"). This devastating impairment undermines performance of valued activities and quality of life. Although rehabilitation is commonly provided, conventional affected arm rehabilitative strategies have negative evidence, or no evidence, supporting their use. Thus, there remains a need for evidence-based rehabilitative strategies for arm hemiparesis. Newer rehabilitative approaches emphasize repetitive, task-specific practice (RTP) incorporating the affected arm. However, many of these promising regimens require participation in intensive therapies, and most are only efficacious on the least impaired patients. Thus, there remains a need for an efficacious, practical RTP technique to address moderate affected arm hemiparesis. To address the above shortfalls, one of the investigators team members piloted an innovative brace integrating electromyography (EMG) and robotics. In his case series, 8 stroke patients exhibiting moderate arm impairment successfully participated in RTP, with the brace (called the "Myomo") detecting and augmenting their movement attempts. Aided by the Myomo, participation in the RTP regimen reduced subjects' affected arm impairment and spasticity. The next logical step is to test Myomo + RTP efficacy using randomized controlled methods and an appropriate sample size.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2019
CompletedFebruary 7, 2022
February 1, 2022
2.3 years
May 16, 2012
February 19, 2017
February 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Impairment in the Affected Upper Extremity as Measured by the Fugl Meyer Scale.
The upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM) will assess whether changes occur in paretic upper extremity motor impairment. The FM has been used extensively in stroke recovery studies, and is highly recommended for "use in clinical trials designed to evaluate changes in motor impairment following stroke." The items on the measure require the subject to perform various movements with the affected upper extremity, and each item is scored from 0 (cannot perform) to 2 (performs normally). Item are then summed for a total score. The total score ranges are 0 to 66, with a higher score representing less upper extremity impairment (and, thus, a relatively "better" score on the measure than a lower score).
Administered twice before the intervention period. These two scores are averaged to provide a composite score that is compared to average score for each group that is collected 1 week after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT)
Administered twice before the intervention period. These two scores are averaged to provide a composite score that is compared to average score for each group that is collected 1 week after intervention
Study Arms (3)
Experimental: Myomo Only Group
EXPERIMENTALExperimental: Myomo Only Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy known as "repetitive task specific practice" (RTP) using only the Myomo robotic device targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week, in 1/2 hour increments, during an 8-week period.
Experimental: Myomo + RTP Group
EXPERIMENTALExperimental: Myomo + RTP Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy using both the Myomo robotic device and RTP targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week in 1/2 hour increments, during an 8 week period. These patients engage in activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the device providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion. As patients progress, the amount of assistance provided by the device during the activities is reduced.
Active Comparator: RTP Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive Comparator: RTP Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy using only RTP that is targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week during a 8 week period. In this condition, patients engage in activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the therapist providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion. As patients progress, the amount of assistance provided by the therapist during the activities is reduced.
Interventions
Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy (repetitive task specific therapy,, also known as "RTP' in this study) using only the Myomo robotic device targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week during a 8 week period. These patients engage in RTP, which consists of a battery of activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the device providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion.
Active Comparator: RTP Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy using only RTP that is targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week during a 8 week period. In this condition, patients engage in activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the therapist providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion. As patients progress, the amount of assistance provided by the therapist during the activities is reduced.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- upper extremity Fugl Meyer score \>10-\< 25 (i.e., subject must score between (and including) 10 and 25 on the UE FM at the baseline screening appointment only)
- presence of volitionally activated EMG signal from the paretic biceps brachii of at least 5 ųV in amplitude
- stroke experienced \> 1 month prior to study enrollment
- a score \> 24 on the Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
- age \> 35 \< 85
- have experienced one stroke
- discharged from all forms of physical rehabilitation
- Myomo brace fits on affected arm properly and without discomfort (i.e., no red marks or discomfort observed in 10 minutes of use during fitting).
- \< 35 years old
- excessive pain in the affected hand, arm or shoulder, as measured by a score \> 5 on a 10-point visual analog scale
- excessive spasticity at the affected elbow, as defined as a score of \> 4 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale
- currently participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug studies
- apraxia (\< 2.5 on the Alexander scale)
- severe sensory loss in affected hand (Nottingham sensory scale at least 75% of normal)
- severe language deficits (score \< 2 on NIH Stroke Scale question 9)
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Stephen Page
- Organization
- The Ohio State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen Page, PhD,M.S.
Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2012
First Posted
July 31, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 7, 2022
Results First Posted
June 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2022-02