NCT01654315

Brief Summary

Of the 5.7 million stroke survivors in the United States, up to 80% exhibit significant weakness in one arm (called "hemiparesis"). This devastating impairment undermines performance of valued activities and quality of life. Although rehabilitation is commonly provided, conventional affected arm rehabilitative strategies have negative evidence, or no evidence, supporting their use. Thus, there remains a need for evidence-based rehabilitative strategies for arm hemiparesis. Newer rehabilitative approaches emphasize repetitive, task-specific practice (RTP) incorporating the affected arm. However, many of these promising regimens require participation in intensive therapies, and most are only efficacious on the least impaired patients. Thus, there remains a need for an efficacious, practical RTP technique to address moderate affected arm hemiparesis. To address the above shortfalls, one of the investigators team members piloted an innovative brace integrating electromyography (EMG) and robotics. In his case series, 8 stroke patients exhibiting moderate arm impairment successfully participated in RTP, with the brace (called the "Myomo") detecting and augmenting their movement attempts. Aided by the Myomo, participation in the RTP regimen reduced subjects' affected arm impairment and spasticity. The next logical step is to test Myomo + RTP efficacy using randomized controlled methods and an appropriate sample size.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 16, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2012

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 4, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 7, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

May 16, 2012

Results QC Date

February 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

RTP Only GroupMyomo Only GroupMyomo + RTP Group

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Impairment in the Affected Upper Extremity as Measured by the Fugl Meyer Scale.

    The upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM) will assess whether changes occur in paretic upper extremity motor impairment. The FM has been used extensively in stroke recovery studies, and is highly recommended for "use in clinical trials designed to evaluate changes in motor impairment following stroke." The items on the measure require the subject to perform various movements with the affected upper extremity, and each item is scored from 0 (cannot perform) to 2 (performs normally). Item are then summed for a total score. The total score ranges are 0 to 66, with a higher score representing less upper extremity impairment (and, thus, a relatively "better" score on the measure than a lower score).

    Administered twice before the intervention period. These two scores are averaged to provide a composite score that is compared to average score for each group that is collected 1 week after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT)

    Administered twice before the intervention period. These two scores are averaged to provide a composite score that is compared to average score for each group that is collected 1 week after intervention

Study Arms (3)

Experimental: Myomo Only Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental: Myomo Only Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy known as "repetitive task specific practice" (RTP) using only the Myomo robotic device targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week, in 1/2 hour increments, during an 8-week period.

Device: Myomo Robotic Arm

Experimental: Myomo + RTP Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental: Myomo + RTP Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy using both the Myomo robotic device and RTP targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week in 1/2 hour increments, during an 8 week period. These patients engage in activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the device providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion. As patients progress, the amount of assistance provided by the device during the activities is reduced.

Device: Myomo Robotic Arm

Active Comparator: RTP Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active Comparator: RTP Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy using only RTP that is targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week during a 8 week period. In this condition, patients engage in activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the therapist providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion. As patients progress, the amount of assistance provided by the therapist during the activities is reduced.

Behavioral: RTP Standard Therapy

Interventions

Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy (repetitive task specific therapy,, also known as "RTP' in this study) using only the Myomo robotic device targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week during a 8 week period. These patients engage in RTP, which consists of a battery of activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the device providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion.

Experimental: Myomo + RTP GroupExperimental: Myomo Only Group

Active Comparator: RTP Group Patients are administered rehabilitative therapy using only RTP that is targeting their affected arms on 3 days/week during a 8 week period. In this condition, patients engage in activities that emphasize use of their affected arms repetitively, with the therapist providing assistance as needed with movement through the arm's range of motion. As patients progress, the amount of assistance provided by the therapist during the activities is reduced.

Active Comparator: RTP Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • upper extremity Fugl Meyer score \>10-\< 25 (i.e., subject must score between (and including) 10 and 25 on the UE FM at the baseline screening appointment only)
  • presence of volitionally activated EMG signal from the paretic biceps brachii of at least 5 ųV in amplitude
  • stroke experienced \> 1 month prior to study enrollment
  • a score \> 24 on the Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
  • age \> 35 \< 85
  • have experienced one stroke
  • discharged from all forms of physical rehabilitation
  • Myomo brace fits on affected arm properly and without discomfort (i.e., no red marks or discomfort observed in 10 minutes of use during fitting).
  • \< 35 years old
  • excessive pain in the affected hand, arm or shoulder, as measured by a score \> 5 on a 10-point visual analog scale
  • excessive spasticity at the affected elbow, as defined as a score of \> 4 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale
  • currently participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug studies
  • apraxia (\< 2.5 on the Alexander scale)
  • severe sensory loss in affected hand (Nottingham sensory scale at least 75% of normal)
  • severe language deficits (score \< 2 on NIH Stroke Scale question 9)
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Paresis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Stephen Page
Organization
The Ohio State University

Study Officials

  • Stephen Page, PhD,M.S.

    Ohio State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2012

First Posted

July 31, 2012

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 7, 2022

Results First Posted

June 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations