The Laryngeal Mask Airway in Edentulous Geriatric Patients
Comparison of The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ Versus Unique™ in Edentulous Geriatric Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With an aging population a prevalence of edentulous patients increased above 60 % among individuals aged ≥65 yr. Face mask ventilation of these edentulous patients is often difficult because of the inadequate fitting of the standard mask to the face. In addition, because of a reduction in muscle tone under general anesthesia, the air space in the oropharynx is reduced, and posterior displacement of the tongue, soft palate and epiglottis tend to close the airway. The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a better alternative to the standard face mask if the facial contours of the patient are not suited to the standard face mask. It is more difficult to perform bag-mask ventilation in edentulous patients than in patients with intact dentition. The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a better alternative to the standard face mask if the facial contours of the patient are not suited to the standard face mask. We aimed to compare the routinely used laryngeal mask airway in our clinic, the LMA Unique™ with the newly released LMA Supreme™ in edentulous elderly patients for the success in first attempt insertion, ease and time of insertion, and oropharyngeal leak pressure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 19, 2018
CompletedOctober 19, 2018
December 1, 2017
8 months
July 21, 2014
April 26, 2015
December 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First Attempt's Success Rate of Insertion
Edentulous elderly patients for the success in first attempt insertion, ease and time of insertion (second).
after anaesthesia induction
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
before surgery
Study Arms (2)
Group LMA Unique
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe supraglottic airway devices were deflated fully before insertion. Size 4 LMA was used for those with a weight of 50-70 kg and size 5 LMA for those between 70-100 kg. After insertion, each device was inflated with a hand-held airway manometer (Rusch, Germany) to an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O.The oropharyngeal leak pressure was determined by transiently stopping ventilation and closing the adjustable pressure-limiting valve with a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min until airway pressure reached a steady state and a voice of leakage was heard. The airway pressure was not allowed to exceed 40 cm H2O.
Group LMA Supreme
EXPERIMENTALThe supraglottic airway devices were deflated fully before insertion. Size 4 LMA was used for those with a weight of 50-70 kg and size 5 LMA for those between 70-100 kg. After insertion, each device was inflated with a hand-held airway manometer (Rusch, Germany) to an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O.The oropharyngeal leak pressure was determined by transiently stopping ventilation and closing the adjustable pressure-limiting valve with a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min until airway pressure reached a steady state and a voice of leakage was heard. The airway pressure was not allowed to exceed 40 cm H2O.
Interventions
The supraglottic airway devices were deflated fully before insertion. After placement an effective airway was defined as the presence of normal thoracoabdominal movement and a square-wave end-tidal carbon dioxide trace.
The supraglottic airway devices were deflated fully before insertion.The supraglottic airway devices were deflated fully before insertion. After placement an effective airway was defined as the presence of normal thoracoabdominal movement and a square-wave end-tidal carbon dioxide trace.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-III
- years and older
You may not qualify if:
- Any neck or upper respiratory pathology
- Those at risk of gastric content regurgitation/aspiration (previous upper gastro-intestina system surgery, known hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, history of peptic ulcer, full stomach, pregnancy)
- Possibility of and those with history of difficult intubation (history of impossible intubation, Mallampati classification 3-4, sterno mental distance less than 12 cm, thyromental distance less than 6 cm, head extension less than 90 degrees, mouth opening less than 1.5 cm)
- Those with low pulmonary compliance or high airway resistance (morbid obesity, lung disease)
- Throat pain, dysphagia and dysphonia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Izmi̇r, Narlıdere, 35320, Turkey (Türkiye)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
- Organization
- DorkuzEU
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
TANGUL KILIÇ, M.D.
Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- STUDY DIRECTOR
SEMİH KUCUKGUCLU, M.D.
Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2014
First Posted
July 22, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 19, 2018
Results First Posted
October 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-12