Landmark Guided Midline Versus Pre-procedural Ultrasound Guided Paramedian at L5S1 for Spinal Anaesthesia
Comparison of Conventional Landmark Guided Midline (Group C) Versus Pre-procedural Ultrasound Guided Paramedian at L5S1 (Group P) Technique for Spinal Anaesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal anesthesia is widely performed using a surface landmark based 'blind' technique. Multiple passes and attempts while administering spinal anesthesia are associated with a greater incidence of post dural-puncture headache, paraesthesia and spinal hematoma. Real time and pre-procedural neuraxial ultrasound techniques have been used to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia. The use of real time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia has to date been limited to case series and case reports.Its use may be limited by the requirement for wide bore needles and the technical difficulties associated with simultaneous ultrasound scanning and needle advancement. The use of pre-procedural ultrasound has been shown to increase the first pass success rate for spinal anesthesia only in patients with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. No technique has been shown to improve the success rate of dural puncture when applied routinely to all patients. Routine use of pre-procedure ultrasound guided paramedian approach results in 50% reduction in number of passes required for spinal anaesthetic, from a study at Cork University Hospital (awaiting publication). L5-S1 is the widest interlaminar space and provides minimal contribution to overall movement of lumbar spine.This interspinous space might still be accessible even if the patient has minimal spine flexion. We also noted that spinal needle insertion via the L5-S1 interspace was associated with the fewest passes in the pre-procedure guided ultrasound group (although non-significant). We hypothesise that the routine use of pre-procedural ultrasound-guided paramedian spinal technique at L5S1 interspinous space will result in fewer needle passes to enter the subarachnoid space when compared to the conventional landmark based midline approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 28, 2015
August 1, 2015
1 year
July 5, 2014
August 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
difference in number of passes between the two groups.
The number of passes, defined as the number of forward advancements of the spinal needle in a given interspinous space (i.e. withdrawal and redirection of spinal needle without exiting the skin)
30 minutes within completion of apinal anaesthetic
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Number of spinal needle insertion attempts
Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic
Blood in spinal needle
Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic
Time for identifying landmarks
Up to 10 minutes fraom start of plapating for landmarks - Completed once anethetist declares that markings are complete
Time taken for performing spinal anesthetic
Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic
Incidence of radicular pain
Up to 24 hours after administration of spinal anaesthetic
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group C
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group underwent Conventional landmark guided midline spinal anaesthesia.
Group P
EXPERIMENTALThis group had pre-procedure ultrasound guided L5S1 paramedian spinal anaesthesia performed
Interventions
Spinal anaesthesia was administered based on conventional landmark based midline approach.
In group P, a portable ultrasound unit was used for initial pre-procedural marking. The L5 S1 interspinous space with best image of the anterior complex (ligamentum flavum dura complex- LFD) and posterior complex (posterior longitudinal ligament- PLL) was obtained. At this selected interspace, and with the probe positioned to obtain the clearest ultrasound image, a skin marker was used to mark the midpoint of the long border of the probe and the midpoints of the short borders of the probe . At the same horizontal level as the midpoint of the long border of the probe, the midpoint of the line drawn between the two short border midpoints of the probe was used as paramedian insertion point for the spinal needle.Spinal anaesthesia is then administered based on these landmarks.
Spinal anaesthesia is administered with appropriate spinal needle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All consented patients scheduled to undergo elective total knee or total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia will be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contraindications to spinal anesthesia (allergy to local anesthetic, coagulopathy, local infection and indeterminate neurological disease) will be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cork University Hospital
Cork,Ireland, Cork, Ireland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karthikeyan Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, FCARCSI,MD
Cork University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist Registrar,Anaesthetics,Cork University Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2014
First Posted
July 14, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08