"Light" Versus "Deep" Bispectral Index (BIS) Guided Sedation for Colonoscopy
A Randomised Controlled Trial of "Light" Versus "Deep" Sedation for Elective Outpatient Colonoscopy: Recall, Procedural Conditions and Recovery
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this trial, patients undergoing elective colonoscopy under sedation will be randomised to BIS-guided sedation targeting either "light" (bispectral index \[BIS\] 70-80) or "deep" (BIS\<60) sedation. Sedation will be achieved with a standardised regimen of target-controlled infusion of propofol and fentanyl bolus. The primary end point will be the incidence of procedure recall in each group - this will be assessed at the conclusion of the procedure. The procedural conditions, cardio-respiratory complications and recovery including cognitive function will be assessed during and immediately after the procedure. The incidence of dreaming and patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care will be recorded immediately after the procedure. The study will be complete when the patient leaves the hospital on the day of the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedApril 27, 2015
April 1, 2015
3.3 years
September 22, 2011
April 23, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recall of procedure
Upon rousing patients will be asked if they remember anything between the commencement of sedation and when they awoke from sedation
1 day. Day of procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Complications
1 day. Day of procedure only.
Speed and quality of recovery
1 day. Day of procedure only. Measured before discharge from hospital
Satisfaction
1 day. Day of procedure only. Measured before discharge from hospital
Dreaming
1 day. Day of procedure.
Study Arms (2)
"light" sedation
EXPERIMENTALIn this study the depth of sedation will be guided by the Bispectral Index monitor (BIS monitor). A BIS value of 70-80 will be targeted in the "light" sedation arm.
"deep" sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this study the "deep" sedation arm will have a BIS value of less than 60 targeted.
Interventions
The intervention is the depth of sedation targeted in this study. Patients enrolled in this study will be sedated with the same medications (fentanyl bolus and propofol target controlled infusion), and at the same starting doses, in each study arm. However, the depth of sedation targeted will differ between the arms, and this depth will be guided by the BIS monitor. It is expected that those patients randomised to "deep" sedation will require a higher dose of sedative medication to achieve their target BIS value (\<60) than those in the "light" sedation group (BIS 70-80).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Plan for elective outpatient colonoscopy under sedation
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent for study entry and completion of all study related procedures
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status grade 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Colonoscopy and gastroscopy booked as joint procedures
- Colonoscopy on emergency patients and/or inpatients
- Inadequate English comprehension (verbal and written to understand the Participant Information and Consent Form)
- Intellectual or psychiatric disability that prevents consent to and comprehension of study procedures
- Significant cognitive impairment that prevents independent conduct of activities of daily living or results in 3rd party procedural consent being obtained
- ASA physical status grade 4-5
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Melbourne Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Megan L Allen, BMBS
Melbourne Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kate Leslie, MBBS
Melbourne Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Reaseach and Staff anaesthetist, The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2011
First Posted
October 21, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04