EMA-Defined Tinnitus Subgroups
Identification of Unique Tinnitus Subgroups Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to test a new way of measuring the severity of tinnitus using a tool called Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Tinnitus. We will compare the relationship with this tool with another widely used questionnaire. Previous studies we have done suggest there are different patterns of tinnitus bother; we plan to explore how often these patterns occur, and how many patterns of tinnitus bother there are. And lastly we want to test how reliable this type of testing is for measuring the amount of bother people experience from their tinnitus. Hypothesis 1: We will be able to identify 6 or more distinctive patterns of tinnitus. Hypothesis 2: EMA will provide a reliable method for more accurately capturing the amount of bother individuals have from tinnitus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 2, 2016
March 1, 2016
1 year
July 14, 2014
March 1, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Tinnitus
This is a two week period of capturing real time data regarding a subjects tinnitus bother, environment, and activity at random periods of the day. This is a patient self report measure, but captures data in real time vs. asking them to recall information retrospectively.
Week 1-2 and Week 4-6
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)
Pre-Screening, Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects will be recruited from Otolaryngology Clinics and from Tinnitus Support Groups
You may qualify if:
- Age between the ages of 21 and 80.
- Have subjective, unilateral or bilateral, tinnitus of 6 months' duration or longer.
- Must be score of 1, 2, 3, or 4 on Global Bother Score. (Range is 0-4, with 0 being not bothered and 4 being extremely bothered)
- Must have access to a smart phone device compatible with the notification system.
- Must be able to read, write, and understand English.
You may not qualify if:
- Tinnitus related to Workman's Compensation Claim or other litigation-related situations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Related Publications (6)
Stone AA, Shiffman S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann Behav Med. 2002 Summer;24(3):236-43. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09.
PMID: 12173681BACKGROUNDShiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415.
PMID: 18509902BACKGROUNDFreedman MJ, Lester KM, McNamara C, Milby JB, Schumacher JE. Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Mar;30(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.10.005.
PMID: 16490673BACKGROUNDMeikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Myers PJ, Newman CW, Sandridge S, Turk DC, Folmer RL, Frederick EJ, House JW, Jacobson GP, Kinney SE, Martin WH, Nagler SM, Reich GE, Searchfield G, Sweetow R, Vernon JA. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):153-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.
PMID: 22156949BACKGROUNDStone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS. Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Oct;31(10):1340-6. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275615.
PMID: 16143666BACKGROUNDAxelsson A, Ringdahl A. Tinnitus--a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol. 1989 Feb;23(1):53-62. doi: 10.3109/03005368909077819.
PMID: 2784987BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 6 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2014
First Posted
July 16, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03