NCT02191592

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to test a new way of measuring the severity of tinnitus using a tool called Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Tinnitus. We will compare the relationship with this tool with another widely used questionnaire. Previous studies we have done suggest there are different patterns of tinnitus bother; we plan to explore how often these patterns occur, and how many patterns of tinnitus bother there are. And lastly we want to test how reliable this type of testing is for measuring the amount of bother people experience from their tinnitus. Hypothesis 1: We will be able to identify 6 or more distinctive patterns of tinnitus. Hypothesis 2: EMA will provide a reliable method for more accurately capturing the amount of bother individuals have from tinnitus.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2014

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 14, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 1, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

TinnitusEMABothersome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ecological Momentary Assessment of Tinnitus

    This is a two week period of capturing real time data regarding a subjects tinnitus bother, environment, and activity at random periods of the day. This is a patient self report measure, but captures data in real time vs. asking them to recall information retrospectively.

    Week 1-2 and Week 4-6

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)

    Pre-Screening, Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Subjects will be recruited from Otolaryngology Clinics and from Tinnitus Support Groups

You may qualify if:

  • Age between the ages of 21 and 80.
  • Have subjective, unilateral or bilateral, tinnitus of 6 months' duration or longer.
  • Must be score of 1, 2, 3, or 4 on Global Bother Score. (Range is 0-4, with 0 being not bothered and 4 being extremely bothered)
  • Must have access to a smart phone device compatible with the notification system.
  • Must be able to read, write, and understand English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Tinnitus related to Workman's Compensation Claim or other litigation-related situations.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Stone AA, Shiffman S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann Behav Med. 2002 Summer;24(3):236-43. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09.

    PMID: 12173681BACKGROUND
  • Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415.

    PMID: 18509902BACKGROUND
  • Freedman MJ, Lester KM, McNamara C, Milby JB, Schumacher JE. Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Mar;30(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.10.005.

    PMID: 16490673BACKGROUND
  • Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Myers PJ, Newman CW, Sandridge S, Turk DC, Folmer RL, Frederick EJ, House JW, Jacobson GP, Kinney SE, Martin WH, Nagler SM, Reich GE, Searchfield G, Sweetow R, Vernon JA. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):153-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.

    PMID: 22156949BACKGROUND
  • Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS. Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Oct;31(10):1340-6. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275615.

    PMID: 16143666BACKGROUND
  • Axelsson A, Ringdahl A. Tinnitus--a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol. 1989 Feb;23(1):53-62. doi: 10.3109/03005368909077819.

    PMID: 2784987BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Weeks
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2014

First Posted

July 16, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

July 1, 2015

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 2, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations