The PAtient Preference Analysis of Yearly Follow-up After PCI (PAPAYA)

NCT02189070 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: K13-28
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 2,566
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the preference of patients regarding the approach for follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. We hypothesize that patients prefer questionnaires for annual follow-up assessment when compared to telephone or email.

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Follow-up; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Patient preference; DUTCH PEERS; TWENTE

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Assessment of preferred approach for annual follow-up after PCI

  1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• Least preferred approach for follow up

  1 year

• Maximum acceptable number of questions to be answered

  1 year

Study Arms (2)

Responders

Responding participants

Non-responders

Non-responding participants

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients enrolled in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) studies TWENTE trial (a broad study population reflecting real-world PCI patients) and DUTCH PEERS trial (an all-comers populatoin), who were treated at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede between June 2008 and May 2012

You may qualify if:

• All patients enrolled in the TWENTE trial and DUTCH PEERS trial (an all-comers population, who were treated at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede between June 2008 and May 2012

You may not qualify if:

• Patients who had withdrawn their consent for participation in the TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS trials, respectively. Patients who passed away during follow-up could obviously not be approached for further questioning.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Thorax Centrum Twente: lead

Study Sites (1)

Medisch Spectrum Twente

Enschede, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Kok MM, von Birgelen C, Lam MK, Lowik MM, van Houwelingen KG, Stoel MG, Louwerenburg JH, de Man FH, Hartmann M, Doggen CJ, van Til JA, IJzerman MJ. Patient preference regarding assessment of clinical follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention: the PAPAYA study. EuroIntervention. 2016 Apr 20;11(13):1487-94. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M10_06.

  PMID: 26465376 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease; Patient Preference

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary Disease; Myocardial Ischemia; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Arteriosclerosis; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Patient Satisfaction; Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Health Behavior; Behavior

Study Officials

• Clemens von Birgelen, MD,PhD,Prof

  Thorax Centrum Twente

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Target Duration: 1 Year
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 11, 2014
• First Posted: July 14, 2014
• Study Start: July 1, 2013
• Primary Completion: August 1, 2014
• Study Completion: September 1, 2014
• Last Updated: May 14, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations

NL (1)