NCT02188134

Brief Summary

Per-capita consumption of medication is higher in older adults than any other sector of the population. In fact, it has been estimated that although older adults comprise 13% of the population they take 34% of all prescriptions and 30% of the over-the-counter (OTCs) consumed in the US (National Council on Patient Information and Education, 2010). Given current trends in aging, the savings, freedom and flexibility that self-medicating provides, as well as the trends to switch prescription products to an OTC status, it is likely that older adults will increasingly turn to OTCs as part of their medical regimens for years to come (Hanlon, J et al, 2001). In addition to the advantages that self-medicating offers, there are risks. These risks are more pronounced in older consumers, who are likely experiencing physiological changes (e.g. pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, perceptual, cognitive and motor); this combines with a propensity for poly-pharmacy that escalates the likelihood of adverse drug reactions. It has also been suggested that low health literacy rates in older consumers detrimentally impact health and health outcomes in this population (Kutner et al., 2005 and Federman et al., 2009). Despite the risks associated with improper OTC use, the critical importance of OTC labeling information (there is no learned intermediary), and the fact that older consumers are significantly more likely to experience an adverse drug reaction than younger adults, surprisingly little information exists about the decision making process older adults employ when selecting and using an OTC product. We propose to recruit people 65 and older for an eye tracking study of mock OTC brands. The study has the following objectives:

  1. 1.To begin to garner insights regarding the proportion of subjects who closely examine (e.g. turn to the Drug Facts Label) the labeling of an OTC when deciding whether (or not) a drug is appropriate for them (based on their health history and current medications).
  2. 2.To quantify and compare the attentive behaviors to specific information (Specifically: name, active ingredient, symptom relief).
  3. 3.To quantify and compare the attentive behaviors to different formats of information (prominently featured information vs less prominently featured information).
  4. 4.To begin to benchmark whether or not older consumers make appropriate choices based on their current conditions and medication history.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 7, 2015

Status Verified

April 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

July 8, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Adverse events,adverse drug reactions,medication error,noncompliance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Time in zone

    Eye tracking will be done while mock OTCs appear on a computer screen, and participants will be asked to make a binary choice (yes/no) regarding whether (or not) the drug is safe choice for them at present. Treatments will appear in random order . Subjects will be asked to answer the question, "Assuming you have this condition, is this product appropriate for you?" for each of the twenty-seven trials while we track the movement of the eye. Zones for the analysis of the data include product name, symptom relief and active ingredient. Time in zone is the amount of time a subject's eye spends on the targeted information.

    Measure taken in a single session with participant

  • Time to first hit

    Eye tracking will be done while mock OTCs appear on a computer screen, and participants will be asked to make a binary choice (yes/no) regarding whether (or not) the drug is safe choice for them at present. Treatments will appear in random order . Subjects will be asked to answer the question, "Assuming you have this condition, is this product appropriate for you?" for each of the twenty-seven trials while we track the movement of the eye. Zones for the analysis of the data include product name, symptom relief and active ingredient. Time to first hit is the measure of time it takes for a subject to fixate information in the zones described above.

    Measure taken in a single session with participant

  • Number of visual hits

    Eye tracking will be done while mock OTCs appear on a computer screen, and participants will be asked to make a binary choice (yes/no) regarding whether (or not) the drug is safe choice for them at present. Treatments will appear in random order . Subjects will be asked to answer the question, "Assuming you have this condition, is this product appropriate for you?" for each of the twenty-seven trials while we track the movement of the eye. Zones for the analysis of the data include product name, symptom relief and active ingredient. Number of visual hits is the number of times the eye returns to a given information zone

    Measure taken in a single session with participant

  • Appropriate product selection

    Eye tracking will be done while mock OTCs appear on a computer screen, and participants will be asked to make a binary choice (yes/no) regarding whether (or not) the drug is safe choice for them at present. Treatments will appear in random order . Subjects will be asked to answer the question, "Assuming you have this condition, is this product appropriate for you?" for each of the twenty-seven trials while we track the movement of the eye. Based on the self-reported history that is provided during a guided interview, and the medications that they have brought with them, an assessment will be made regarding the "correctness" of their response to whether or not the drug is an appropriate choice for them

    Measure taken in a single session with participant

Study Arms (1)

65 and older

No intervention will be administered

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

65 and older self administer medication Purchase OTCs

You may qualify if:

  • or older legally sighted administer own medication purchase OTC have transportation to one of two test sites Be willing to share a complete health history and complete list of medications

You may not qualify if:

  • Legally blind Does not use OTC medications Less than 65 Does not administer own medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Packaging Building

East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPatient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Laura Bix, PhD

    Michigan State Univeristy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2014

First Posted

July 11, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 7, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-04

Locations