A Prospective Study Evaluating the Use of Intraoperative Stroke Volume Variation Via the FloTrac Device to Guide Fluid and Vasopressor Management in Head and Neck Free Flaps
Does the Intraoperative Use of the FloTrac Device to Guide Fluid and Vasopressor Management Affect Postoperative Morbidity in Patients Receiving a Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer
1 other identifier
interventional
94
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate whether the intraoperative use of the FloTrac device to guide fluid and vasopressor management during head and neck free flap surgery improves postoperative outcome. Primary postoperative outcome is length of hospital stay. Secondary postoperative outcomes include days in ICU, days on ventilator, presence of postoperative pulmonary edema, need for postoperative vasopressors or transfusions, 30 day flap complication rate, inpatient postoperative cardiorespiratory complications/events, and overall 30 day flap failure rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer
Started Dec 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 21, 2018
CompletedSeptember 20, 2018
August 1, 2018
1.8 years
June 20, 2014
March 16, 2016
August 21, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ICU Stay
The primary outcome is length of ICU stay.
Participants were assessed from entry into ICU until departure.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Requiring a Ventilator
The number of participants requiring a ventilator after surgery.
Study Arms (2)
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONArterial line (radial, femoral, dorsalis pedis, or brachial), central line for access when needed, intubation vs tracheostomy, general anesthesia. We currently use stroke-volume variability monitoring (FloTrac) in all patients using the arterial line placed for blood pressure monitoring.
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe study will use a treatment algorithm for patients in the treatment group. This algorithm will aim to maintain a near-normal blood pressure and use goal directed therapy to achieve this. Currently the standard of care is to use IV fluid exclusively in these patients and anesthesia providers everywhere have been challenging that treatment plan. Our algorithm has an iterative approach assessing volume status, cardiac output and vascular tone in order, with interventions specified for each. Individual treatments have been proven safe and effective in this population, we believe this sequence may be the best current management system. By avoiding excessive fluid administration we expect to decrease ICU length of stay due to the comorbidities caused (pulmonary edema, bowl edema, glycocalyx damage).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults requiring "free flap" tissue reassignment surgery for head and neck cancer at either MUSC or Vanderbilt Medical Center
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 55kg or \> 140 kg based on literature regarding accuracy of flotrac.
- Patients with sustained intraoperative dysrrhythmias based on literature regarding accuracy of flotrac (ie, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation).
- Patients with diagnosed NYHA class III-IV failure or documented EF \< 30%
- Patients with pulmonary disease preventing administration of goal tidal volumes without excessive inspiratory pressures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Hand
- Organization
- MUSC
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Scott T Reeves, MD
Medical University of South Carolina
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2014
First Posted
July 10, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 20, 2018
Results First Posted
August 21, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08