NCT02167074

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two EUS-guided tissue acquisition devices; the 25G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device and the 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
615

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
10 countries

13 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2014

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2015

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 25, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 23, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2014

Results QC Date

August 7, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 19, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Diagnostic accuracyEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationEUS-FNAEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle BiopsyEUS-FNBPancreatic massLymph node

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic Accuracy

    Diagnostic accuracy is the number of correctly diagnosed cases as compared to gold standard diagnosis Gold standard diagnosis is defined as; 1. in operated patients; based on the surgical resection specimen 2. in non-operated patients; based on the conclusions of the diagnostic work-up (combined outcomes of tissue sampling and imaging studies), and confirmed by a compatible clinical disease course of at least 9 months

    27 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Participants in Whom Target Lesion Was Sampled

    1 day

  • Presence of Vital Target Cells Per Case, Per Needle Type

    after 27 months

  • Number of Patients With Adverse Events Per Needle Type

    27 months after procedure

  • Diagnostic Yield of the First Needle Pass

    after 27 months

  • On-site Pathological Evaluation Performed

    27 months

Study Arms (2)

25G FNA needle

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of a pancreatic mass, lymph node, or other submucosal or undefined mass (non-pancreatic).

Device: 25G FNA needle

20G ProCore FNB needle

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of a pancreatic mass, lymph node, or other submucosal or undefined mass (non-pancreatic).

Device: 20G ProCore FNB needle

Interventions

Also known as: 25G Echotip Ultra Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) device
25G FNA needle
Also known as: 20G Echotip ProCore Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) device
20G ProCore FNB needle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients referred for EUS-guided tissue acquisition because of a (I) pancreatic mass lesion or (II) lymph node
  • Age \> 18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Lesion can be visualized with EUS and is ≥1 cm in size

You may not qualify if:

  • Known bleeding disorder that cannot be sufficiently corrected with co-fact or fresh frozen plasma (FFP)
  • Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued in order to guarantee an INR below 1.5
  • Purely cystic lesions
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

University of California

Irvine, California, CA 92868, United States

Location

Yale University School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, CT 06520, United States

Location

Stony Brook University Hospital

New York, New York, NY 11794, United States

Location

The Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, Australia

Location

University Hospital Leuven

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Marseille, France

Location

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

Vita Salute San Raffaele University

Milan, Italy

Location

Catholic University Rome

Rome, Italy

Location

Kinki University

Ōsaka-sayama, Japan

Location

Erasmus University Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 CE, Netherlands

Location

University Hospital of Santiago de Compostella

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Location

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • van Riet PA, Giorgio Arcidiacono P, Petrone M, Quoc Nguyen N, Kitano M, Chang K, Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Giovannini M, van der Merwe S, Santo E, Baldaque-Silva F, Bucobo JC, Bruno MJ, Aslanian HR, Cahen DL, Farrell J. Combined versus single use 20 G fine-needle biopsy and 25 G fine-needle aspiration for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of solid gastrointestinal lesions. Endoscopy. 2020 Jan;52(1):37-44. doi: 10.1055/a-0966-8755. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

  • van Riet PA, Larghi A, Attili F, Rindi G, Nguyen NQ, Ruszkiewicz A, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Aslanian H, Farrell J, Robert M, Adeniran A, Van Der Merwe S, Roskams T, Chang K, Lin F, Lee JG, Arcidiacono PG, Petrone M, Doglioni C, Iglesias-Garcia J, Abdulkader I, Giovannini M, Bories E, Poizat F, Santo E, Scapa E, Marmor S, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, Heimann A, Wu M, Baldaque-Silva F, Moro CF, Erler NS, Biermann K, Poley JW, Cahen DL, Bruno MJ. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. P. van Riet
Organization
Erasmusm MC University Medical Center Rotterdam

Study Officials

  • Marco J Bruno, MD, PhD

    Erasmus Medical Center

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Djuna L Cahen, MD, PhD

    Erasmus Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2014

First Posted

June 18, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 23, 2021

Results First Posted

March 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2021-08

Locations