Controlled Trial Comparing the Performance of 22 Gauge Versus 25 Gauge EUS-FNA Needles (FNA-22G-25G)
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Performance of 22 Gauge Versus 25 Gauge EUS-FNA Needles
1 other identifier
observational
135
3 countries
9
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare the performance characteristics of EUS-FNA 22 Gauge needle and EUS FNA 25 Gauge needle in terms of cellularity and diagnostic yield for diagnosis of various pathologies, including lymph nodes, pancreatic, luminal and other lesions outlined by EUS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2009
Typical duration for all trials
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedApril 8, 2014
April 1, 2014
5 months
November 18, 2009
April 7, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Value of EUS-FNA 22 Gauge needle comparing with EUS-FNA 25 Gauge needle in terms of cellularity and diagnostic yield for diagnosis of various pathologies.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
22 G Needle EUS-FNA
Patients referred for an EUS examination and EUS-FNA of a solid mass lesion adjacent to the upper GI tract using a 22 G needle
25 G Needle EUS-FNA
Patients referred for an EUS examination and EUS-FNA of a solid mass lesion adjacent to the upper GI tract using a 25 G needle
Eligibility Criteria
Patients referred to one of the participating departments for an EUS examination with EUS-FNA (mediastinal tumours and lymph nodes, celiac, perigastric and peri-pancreatic lymph nodes, pancreatic masses, liver masses, adrenal masses, etc.).
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred for an EUS examination and EUS-FNA of a solid mass lesion adjacent to the upper GI tract
- Well informed signed consent for EUS-guided FNA
You may not qualify if:
- Severe coagulopathy
- Uncorrectable severe platelet dysfunction
- Presence of large intervening vessels on color or power Doppler
- Failure to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagenlead
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiovacollaborator
- Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Celle, Germanycollaborator
- Pathologic Institute, Wittinger Strasse, Celle, Germanycollaborator
- Sana Hospital Lübeck GmbH, Lübeck, Germanycollaborator
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorfcollaborator
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holsteincollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, Hellerup
Copenhagen, Denmark
Endoscopy Z-806, Gentofte, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospitals
Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Medicine, GI Division, Allgemeines Krankenhaus MD
Celle, Germany
Klinik für Gastroenterologie/GI-Onkologie, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle
Celle, Germany
Pathologic Institute, Wittinger Strasse
Celle, Germany
Cytological Laboratory, Hospital Grosshansdorf - Center for Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery
Großhansdorf, Germany
Department of Internal Medicine, Sana Hospital Lübeck GmbHg, MD
Lübeck, Germany
Department of Pathology, Medical University Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, Germany
Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Craiova, Romania
Related Publications (3)
Vilmann P, Puri R. The complete ''medical'' mediastinoscopy (EUS-FNA + EBUS-TBNA). Minerva Med. 2007 Aug;98(4):331-8.
PMID: 17921946BACKGROUNDSaftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov B, Georgescu CV. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan;42(1):117-25. doi: 10.1080/00365520600789800.
PMID: 17190771BACKGROUNDVilmann P, Saftoiu A, Hollerbach S, Skov BG, Linnemann D, Popescu CF, Wellmann A, Gorunescu F, Clementsen P, Freund U, Flemming P, Hassan H, Gheonea DI, Streba L, Ioncica AM, Streba CT. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;48(7):877-83. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.799222.
PMID: 23795663DERIVED
Biospecimen
Pathology samples obtained through EUS-FNA biopsy processed by paraffin embedding.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Vilmann, Professor
Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2009
First Posted
November 19, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 8, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04