Study of Efficacy and Safety of Bimagrumab in Patients After Hip Fracture Surgery
A 24-week Double-blind Treatment and 24-week Follow-up, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Phase IIa/IIb Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of i.v. Bimagrumab on Total Lean Body Mass and Physical Performance in Patients After Surgical Treatment of Hip Fracture
2 other identifiers
interventional
251
18 countries
52
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to assess if bimagrumab is safe and effective in patients with muscle wasting (atrophy) after hip fracture surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for phase_2
52 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 25, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 19, 2020
CompletedAugust 19, 2020
August 1, 2020
3.7 years
May 8, 2014
October 17, 2019
August 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Total Lean Body Mass Measured by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) at Weeks 12 and 24
Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) of change from baseline in total LBM (kg) by treatment and visit To assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab and facilitate an adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without the need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least three doses were required, ranging from a non-effective or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy is expected. Original study was initiated with only two doses of bimagrumab, therefore, a lower dose arm of 70mg has been added to this study with Amendment 2, changing the randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, bimagrumab 210mg, or bimagrumab 700mg. Since the 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy and fewer patients were randomized to this group, it was used only for dose response modelling and not for hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluations for the bimagrumab 70mg Arm were performed
baseline, weeks 12 and 24
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in Gait Speed at Week 24 (Meters/Sec)
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Short Physical Performance Battery at Weeks 24
Week 24
Incidence of Falls up to Week 48
Up to Week 48
Study Arms (4)
bimagrumab 700 mg
EXPERIMENTALApproximately 70 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with the bimagrumab high dose administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
bimagrumab 210 mg
EXPERIMENTALApproximately 70 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with the bimagrumab medium dose administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORApproximately 70 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria received matching placbo administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
Bimagrumab 70 mg
EXPERIMENTALApproximately 35 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with bimagrumad low dose administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
Interventions
Bimagrumab was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Matching placebo was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must have X-ray confirmed successful hip fracture repair; Must have completed surgical wound healing; Ability to walk a specified distance with or without a walking aid; Must weigh at least 35 kg.
You may not qualify if:
- Must not have history of any other lower limb fractures in the past 6 months; Must not have certain cardiovascular conditions; Must not have a chronic active infection (e.g. HIV, hepatitis B or C, etc); Must not have used high-dose corticosteroid medications for at least 3 months in the past year;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (53)
Novartis Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
El Cajon, California, 92020, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Denver, Colorado, 80210, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, C1128AAF, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5041, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Graz, 80 10, Austria
Novartis Investigative Site
Bruges, 8000, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, 838 0456, Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia
Novartis Investigative Site
Barranquilla, Colombia
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, Czech Republic, 66250, Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Hradec Králové, Czech Republic, 500 05, Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Pardubice, Czech Republic, 532 03, Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Pilsen, Czech Republic, 30450, Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, Czech Republic, 150 06, Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 100 34, Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34295, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Abbach, 93077, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39110, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Würzburg, 97074, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1062, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1125, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Hatvan, 3000, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, 662-0918, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kochi, Kochi, 780-8522, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 862-0976, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Okayama, Okayama-ken, 701-1192, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Toyama, Toyama, 939-8511, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Aguascalientes, 20127, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
San Luis Potosí City, 78200, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 190103, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 196143, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Sestroretsk, 197706, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Yaroslavl, 150003, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41014, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28049, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 82445, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan District, 33305, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35040, Turkey (Türkiye)
Novartis Investigative Site
Bath, BA1 3NG, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Hofbauer LC, Witvrouw R, Varga Z, Shiota N, Cremer M, Tanko LB, Rooks D, Auberson LZ, Arkuszewski M, Fretault N, Schubert-Tennigkeit AA, Papanicolaou DA, Recknor C. Bimagrumab to improve recovery after hip fracture in older adults: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2a/b trial. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 May;2(5):e263-e274. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00084-2.
PMID: 36098133DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
As there were no statistically significant improvements in functional measures (i.e. gait speed, SPPB) at week 24, the need to test for sustained improvement at wk 48 became irrelevant. So, wk 48 treatment differences were not evaluated
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2014
First Posted
June 2, 2014
Study Start
September 16, 2014
Primary Completion
May 14, 2018
Study Completion
October 25, 2018
Last Updated
August 19, 2020
Results First Posted
August 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08