NCT02137291

Brief Summary

Lung isolation is primordial in thoracic surgery. To achieve it, two techniques are used: the double lumen tube (DLT) and the bronchial blocker (BB). Left-sided DLT (L-DLT) is use by the majority of anesthesiologists for both left and right thoracic surgeries. Standard right-sided DLT (Rs-DLT) is rarely use since it is dif¬ficult to properly position it and that there is a risk of misalignment between the lateral orifice of the tube and the origin of the right upper lobe (RUL) bron¬chus. In 2007, the investigators have published results suggesting enlarging the Rs-DLT's lateral orifice. The modified R-DLT (Rm-DLT) was more frequently in an adequate position: 77% vs 37% of patients (p = 0.0121), and easier to reposition: 97% vs 74% of patients (p= 0.0109) in comparison to the standard R-DLT group. The data suggest the superiority of the Rm-DLT compared to Rs-DLT for optimal positioning to facilitate one-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery. It is believed that DLT tend to provide quicker and better quality of lung collapse than BB. In 2013, investigators have demonstrated an equivalent quality of lung collapse (LC) between L-DLT and BB used with two apnea periods when initiating OLV. Complementary analysis showed a significative difference to obtain complete LC (CLC) between L-DLT for left thoracoscopy and L-DLT for right thoracoscopy and BB in right or left surgery. The investigator hypothesis is that, when using L-DLT for left video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), LC of the isolated lung will be slower and of poorer quality compare to the use of the Rm-DLT. The primary objective is to compare the delay between pleural opening (PO) and CLC in left VATS when using three lung isolation devices: 1) L-DLT and 2) Rm-DLT. Secondary objectives are: 1) to evaluate quality of LC, 2) to evaluate the level of obstruction of the lumen of the left bronchus, 3) to evaluate the quality of OLV (PaO2) 4) To collect blind surgeon's opinion about de device used and 5) to measure the delay between OLV and PO for evaluating the role of absorption atelectasis in obtaining CLC. After obtaining IRB approval, the investigators propose a study of 40 patients undergoing an elective left VATS at IUCPQ involving one lung ventilation. They will have to be 21 years or more, to read, understand and sign an informed consent at their pre-operative evaluation. This study will be prospective, randomized, and blind to thoracic surgeons.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 27, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

September 19, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)Lung isolation deviceOne-lung ventilationDouble lumen endotracheal tubeBronchial blocker

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to obtain complete lung collapse

    Time to obtain complete lung collapse will be collected from the pleural opening up to complete lung collapse.

    Peroperative

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Quality of lung collapse

    Peroperative

  • Degree of obstruction of the right upper lobe bronchus lumen

    Peroperative

  • Quality of one-lung ventilation

    Peroperative

  • Thoracic surgeon's guess about the device used

    Peroperative

  • Time between the beginning of one-lung ventilation to pleural opening

    Peroperative

Study Arms (2)

Left-sided double-lumen tube

Lung isolation with a left-sided double-lumen tube (BronchoCath, Mallinckrodt Medical, Cornamaddy, Athlone, Westmeath, Ireland)

Modified right-sided double-lumen tube

Right-sided double-lumen tube modified in accordance with Bussières et al. in Can J Anesth 2007

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing an elective left VATS requiring OLV

You may qualify if:

  • signed informed consent
  • elective left video-assisted thoracoscopy
  • one lung ventilation

You may not qualify if:

  • Anticipated difficult mask ventilation or intubation
  • tracheal or high bronchial origin of the right upper lobe main bronchus
  • severe COPD or asthma
  • pleural disease
  • previous left thoracic surgery
  • chest radiotherapy
  • chimiotherapy
  • significant systemic co-morbidity
  • active or chronic pulmonary infection
  • fibrosis, other interstitial diseases
  • endobronchial mass
  • tracheostomy
  • severe desaturation in the peroperative period
  • any clinical situation precluding the use of an isolation device

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec

Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Slinger P. The clinical use of right-sided double-lumen tubes. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;57(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9262-z. No abstract available. English, French.

    PMID: 20058114BACKGROUND
  • McKenna MJ, Wilson RS, Botelho RJ. Right upper lobe obstruction with right-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes: a comparison of two tube types. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1988 Dec;2(6):734-40. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(88)90096-8.

    PMID: 17171882BACKGROUND
  • Bussieres JS, Lacasse Y, Cote D, Beauvais M, St-Onge S, Lemieux J, Soucy J. Modified right-sided Broncho-Cath double lumen tube improves endobronchial positioning: a randomized study. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;54(4):276-82. doi: 10.1007/BF03022772.

    PMID: 17400979BACKGROUND
  • Ko R, McRae K, Darling G, Waddell TK, McGlade D, Cheung K, Katz J, Slinger P. The use of air in the inspired gas mixture during two-lung ventilation delays lung collapse during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1092-6. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318195415f.

    PMID: 19299766BACKGROUND
  • Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Tracheal width and left double-lumen tube size: a formula to estimate left-bronchial width. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Jun;17(4):267-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.07.008.

    PMID: 15950850BACKGROUND
  • Fortier G, Cote D, Bergeron C, Bussieres JS. New landmarks improve the positioning of the left Broncho-Cath double-lumen tube-comparison with the classic technique. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Sep;48(8):790-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03016696.

    PMID: 11546721BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Jean S Bussières, MD

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesiologist, Full clinical professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2013

First Posted

May 13, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2015

Study Completion

November 1, 2015

Last Updated

October 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Locations