EZ Blocker Versus Left Sided Double-lumen Tube
Endobronchial EZ Blocker Compared to Left Sided Double-lumen Tube for One-lung Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lung isolation is used to achieve one lung ventilation to facilitate thoracic surgery. Two methods are commonly used, a double lumen tube (DLT) or a bronchial blocker introduced through a single lumen tube. However, both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. Briefly, the DLT can be positioned faster and remains firmly in place, but is sometimes difficult or even impossible to introduce. The DLT is larger than a conventional single lumen tube and the incidence of postoperative hoarseness and airway injuries is higher. Compared to the DLT, bronchial blocking devices are more difficult to position and need more frequent intraoperative repositioning. These disadvantages of the existing devices for lung isolation prompted further development of the bronchial blocker concept. The design of a new Y shaped bronchial blocker, the EZ- Blocker® (AnaesthetIQ BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) (EZB), combines the advantages of both lung isolation techniques. The aim of the study is to compare in a randomised, prospective way the ease of placement, the incidence of malpositioning and the quality of lung deflation of a left DLT and a EZB. Secondly, the incidence and severity of damage to laryngeal, tracheal and bronchial structures caused by the use of the DLT or the EZB is a target of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2011
CompletedMay 2, 2011
August 1, 2010
1.2 years
February 17, 2010
April 29, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the incidence of malposition of a left sided DLT or the EZB
there are four time points (after insertion of the device, after inflation of cuff or balloon, after repositioning patient, during surgery) were malposition are considered. Total time spend is 3 hours on the day of the operation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
description of damage to laryngeal, tracheal and bronchial structures
videobronchoscopy before and after intervention. Time frame 5 min for each video and additional 5 min for assessment afterwards on the day of the operation
the ease of insertion
the ease of insertion of the devices is qualitative variable: 1= excellent, 2= good, 3=average, 4=poor. Time frame is 5 min on the day of the operation.
the incidence of postoperative complains of sore throat and hoarseness
questionnaire (2 questions, time frame is 1 min) after surgery and one day after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Left double lumen tube
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditionally, single lung ventilation is obtained with a double lumen tube (DLT). In our institution a polyvinyl DLT (Broncho-cath, Mallinckrodt,) without carinal hook, is used. This type of tube exists of a tube with two lumen with two distal cuffs. One lumen (called the bronchial lumen) extends some distance further, has a slight curvature and has a small blue cuff. The other lumen (called the tracheal lumen) has a larger cuff. A DLT tube exists in four sizes and one can choose in a left or a right configuration. Almost always, we use a left sided DLT. A DLT has a much larger diameter than a standard single lumen endotracheal tube
EZ-blocker
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe EZ-blocker (EZB) is a semi-rigid catheter but it has two distal extensions, both with an inflatable cuff and a central lumen. It is intended for use in combination with a standard single lumen tube. After the EZB is advanced trough the distal end of the single lumen tube, both extensions spread out and find their way in the left and right main stem bronchi. The place where the two extensions are attached to the shaft now rests on the carina. Fiber optic bronchoscopy should be used for proper positioning. After placement of the EZB, one of the cuffs can be inflated to obtain lung separation under direct visual inspection with fiber optic bronchoscopy.
Interventions
The gold standard for lung isolation is the use of a double lumen tube (DLT). A DLT is a bifurcated tube with a bronchial and a tracheal lumen.
Bronchial blockers are balloon-tipped semi-rigid catheters. Different types are available. They are not easy to put in position and frequently dislocates during repositioning of the patient or during surgical manipulation. To solve these problems, a novel type of bronchus blocker, i.e. the EZ- Blocker® is developed. The EZB is also a semi-rigid catheter but it has two distal extensions, both with an inflatable cuff and a central lumen. These improvements owe to the fact that the blocker anchors itself on the carina with the two extensions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status 1-3 patients
- Patients scheduled for surgery requiring a left sided DLT for single lung ventilation
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications are lesions along the path of the left sided double lumen tube or the EZB
- Tracheal or mainstem bronchial stenosis
- Distorted carinal anatomy,
- Anticipated difficult intubation (Mallampatti score ≥ 3)
- History or presence of tracheostoma
- Patients who require absolute lung separation
- Patients who require sleeve resection of mainstem bronchus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500HB, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jo Mourisse, Dr.
Department of anesthesiology, pain and palliative medicine of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medial Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2010
First Posted
February 23, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2011
Study Completion
April 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 2, 2011
Record last verified: 2010-08