NCT03508050

Brief Summary

Nowadays, lung isolation techniques are an essential part of thoracic anesthesia. The two principal devices used in order to achieve one-lung ventilation (OLV) are the double lumen tube (DLT) and the bronchial blocker (BB). Even though DLT and BB have always been considered equally effective in lung isolation, a study recently published by Bussières et al. demonstrated the clear superiority of BB over DLT in terms of rapidity and quality of lung collapse. In order to explain this result, a physiologic study was recently conducted. During this project, some interesting discoveries were made. In fact, during lung isolation, while the chest is closed, there is a buildup of negative pressure in the NVL until pleural opening. Moreover, an absorption of ambient air through the lumen of the DLT or through the internal channel of the BB is observed. Putting all these elements together, a possible explanation for the superiority of BB over DLT was obtained. Indeed, in the first study of Bussières, the internal channel of BB was occluded. By doing so, there were no possible aspiration of ambient air in the NVL. This condition may have accelerated the absorption atelectasis of the NVL that occurs during lung collapse by reducing NVL volume and by conserving a higher alveolar partial pressure of oxygen in it. The hypothesis is that when using a DLT in OLV, occluding the non-ventilated lung (NVL) lumen will reproduce the BB physiology by accelerating the second phase of lung deflation and giving a better quality of lung collapse compared to usual practice of keeping the non-ventilated lung opened to ambient air. The main objective is to compare the speed and quality of complete lung deflation occurring during OLV with a DLT when the non-ventilated DLT lumen is occluded vs not occluded. This randomized study will include a total of 30 patients scheduled for lung resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Fifteen patients will compose the experimental group (NVL lumen occluded) and 15 other patients will be part of the control group (NVL lumen opened to ambient air).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 29, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 12, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 12, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 27, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 27, 2017

Results QC Date

March 4, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • T50-3

    Moment where the probability of having a complete lung collapse is 50%

    From the beginning of surgery (pleural opening) until 120 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Complete Lung Collapse (CLC-clinical)

    From the beginning of surgery (pleural opening) until 60 minutes

  • O2 Concentration of Expired Air at Pleural Opening

    From pleural opening and lasting 60 seconds

  • Expiratory Volume at Pleural Opening

    From pleural opening and lasting 60 seconds

  • O2 Concentration of Expired Air at the Beginning of One-lung Ventilation

    From the beginning of one-lung ventilation and lasting 60 seconds

  • Optimization of Lung Collapse

    From the beginning of surgery (pleural opening) until 60 minutes

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Clamping double lumen tube

EXPERIMENTAL

Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation

Device: Clamping the Double Lumen Tube

Not Clamping double lumen tube

NO INTERVENTION

Not Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation

Interventions

Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation

Clamping double lumen tube

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Elective lung resection (lobectomies and segmentectomies) by VATS requiring OLV.
  • More than 18 years old.
  • Having read, understand and signed the consent form presented at the pre-operative evaluation

You may not qualify if:

  • A- Pre-operative
  • Known or anticipated difficult tracheal intubation.
  • Bronchoscopic or CT-scan findings contraindicating the insertion of a DLT.
  • Severe COPD or asthma (FEV1 \<50%).
  • Prior intrathoracic surgery (including cardiac surgeries).
  • Pleural or interstitial pathology.
  • Previous chemotherapy or thoracic radiotherapy.
  • Acute or chronic pulmonary infection.
  • Endobronchial mass.
  • Tracheostomy.
  • B- Post-randomisation
  • Bronchoscopic findings contraindicating the insertion of DLT.
  • VATS findings that cancel the surgery.
  • Severe desaturation (SatO2 \< 90%) during the observation period.
  • Any need to reinflate the collapse lung.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec

Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Clayton-Smith A, Bennett K, Alston RP, Adams G, Brown G, Hawthorne T, Hu M, Sinclair A, Tan J. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes and Bronchial Blockers in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Aug;29(4):955-66. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

    PMID: 25753765BACKGROUND
  • Campos JH, Reasoner DK, Moyers JR. Comparison of a modified double-lumen endotracheal tube with a single-lumen tube with enclosed bronchial blocker. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1268-72. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00024.

    PMID: 8942598BACKGROUND
  • Bussieres JS, Somma J, Del Castillo JL, Lemieux J, Conti M, Ugalde PA, Gagne N, Lacasse Y. Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial examining time and quality of lung deflation. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;63(7):818-27. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0657-3. Epub 2016 May 2.

    PMID: 27138896BACKGROUND
  • Pfitzner J, Peacock MJ, McAleer PT. Gas movement in the nonventilated lung at the onset of single-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1999 May;54(5):437-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00845.x.

    PMID: 10995140BACKGROUND
  • Joyce CJ, Baker AB, Kennedy RR. Gas uptake from an unventilated area of lung: computer model of absorption atelectasis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Mar;74(3):1107-16. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.3.1107.

    PMID: 8482648BACKGROUND
  • Bardoczky GI, Engelman E, d'Hollander A. Continuous spirometry: an aid to monitoring ventilation during operation. Br J Anaesth. 1993 Nov;71(5):747-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/71.5.747.

    PMID: 8251293BACKGROUND
  • Bussieres JS, Slinger P. Correct positioning of double-lumen tubes. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9689-5. Epub 2012 Mar 7. No abstract available. English, French.

    PMID: 22395826BACKGROUND
  • Somma J, Couture EJ, Pelletier S, Provencher S, Moreault O, Lohser J, Ugalde PA, Vigneault L, Lemieux J, Somma A, Guay SE, Bussieres JS. Non-ventilated lung deflation during one-lung ventilation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube: a randomized-controlled trial of occluding the non-ventilated endobronchial lumen before pleural opening. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;68(6):801-811. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01957-9. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

Limitations and Caveats

Post-randomisation exclusions. Most of them due to negative biopsies cancelling the need of a lobectomy/segmentectomy. The study was single blinded. (the anesthesiologist knew in which group the patient was but the surgeon was blinded)

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Jean S. Bussières
Organization
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec

Study Officials

  • Sabrina Pelletier, MD

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jean S Bussières, MD

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Just before induction of anesthesia and according to the computerized randomization list generated by the statistical department, each of the 30 patients is allocated to one of the following groups: Control group : OLV with the specific lumen of the NVL opened to ambient air. Experimental group : OLV with a clamp on the specific lumen of the NVL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2017

First Posted

April 25, 2018

Study Start

September 29, 2017

Primary Completion

January 12, 2018

Study Completion

January 12, 2018

Last Updated

April 27, 2020

Results First Posted

April 27, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Locations