NCT02135367

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesized that intra-articular injections of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) to treat knee degenerative articular cartilage pathology could determine pain relief and recovery of knee function with overall clinical outcome comparable or even better than viscosupplementation, which is a common injective approach applied in this kind of pathology. To this purpose the investigators designed a double blind randomized controlled trial comparing PRP vs viscosupplementation. A power analysis has been performed for the primary endpoint of IKDC subjective score improvement at the 12-month follow-up for PRP. From a pilot study, a standard deviation of 15.2 points was found. With an alpha error of 0.05, a beta error of 0.2 and a minimal clinically significant difference of 6.7 points corresponding at 1/3 of the documented mean improvement, the minimum sample size was 83 for each group. Considering a possible drop out of 15%, 96 patients per group are required for total 192 patients, selected according to well-defined inclusion criteria (see 'Eligibility criteria' section). Patients are then assigned to two different treatment groups, according to a randomization list. The first group of treatment consists of three weekly intra-articular injections of autologous PRP obtained with the following procedure: a 150-ml autologous venous blood sample undergoes 2 centrifugations (the first at 1480 rpm for 6 minutes to separate erythrocytes, and a second at 3400 rpm for 15 minutes to concentrate platelets) to produced 20 ml of PRP. This unit of PRP is then divided into 4 small units of 5 ml each. One unit is sent to the laboratory for analysis of platelet concentration and for a quality test, 3 units are stored at -30° C. The second treatment group consists of patients receiving three weekly injections of hyaluronic acid (Hyalubrix 30 mg/2ml, Fidia Farmaceutici Spa, Italy;Molecular Weight: 1500 kDa). To guarantee the blinding of the patients, all of them undergo blood harvesting to obtain autologous PRP which will be used only in half of them, according to the aforementioned randomization list. One week after the PRP production, the injective treatment starts, with 3 weekly injections of PRP or HA. At the moment of the injection the syringe is properly covered to prevent the patient from discovering the substance he was receiving. After the injection, patients are sent home with instructions to limit the use of the leg for at least 24 h and to use cold therapy/ice on the affected area to relieve pain. During this period, the use of non-steroidal medication is forbidden. Patients are prospectively evaluated basally and at 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up using clinical subjective scores and objective parameters to determine clinical outcome (see 'Outcome measure' section). Patient satisfaction and adverse events will be also reported. All the clinical evaluations are performed by a medical staff not involved in the injective procedure, in order to keep the study double blinded. At the end of the study, the nature of the injected substance is revealed to the patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
185

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 7, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2014

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 8, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

May 7, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 7, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

PRPgrowth factorsViscosupplementationinjectionschondropathyrandomized controlled trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) subjective score

    The primary outcome is the difference in IKDC-subjective score at 12 months' follow-up between treatment groups (visco-supplementation vs PRP)

    12 months evaluation

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) for General Health status

    2-, 6-, 12- months evaluation

  • KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) score

    2-, 6-, 12- months evaluation

  • IKDC objective score

    2-, 6-, 12- months evaluation

  • Tegner Score

    2-, 6-, 12- months evaluation

  • Adverse events

    2-, 6-, 12- months evaluation

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PRP

EXPERIMENTAL

This group of patients will be treated by three weekly Platelet rich Plasma intra-articular injections in the knee.

Biological: PRP

HA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group of patients will be treated by three weekly hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injections in the knee. The HA used is Hyalubrix 30 mg/2ml (Fidia Farmaceutici Spa, Padova, Italy)

Biological: PRP

Interventions

PRPBIOLOGICAL

injections of Platelet rich Plasma

HAPRP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • age ranging from 18 to 55
  • patients affected by knee articular degenerative pathology with history of chronic (for at least 4 months) pain or swelling;
  • imaging findings of degenerative changes of the joint (Kellgren Lawrence 0 to 2 at X-ray evaluation).

You may not qualify if:

  • age \> 55 years;
  • Kellgren-Lawrence score at X-ray evaluation \> 2;
  • major axial deviation (varus \>5° , valgus \> 5°),
  • systemic disorders such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, haematological diseases (coagulopathy), severe cardiovascular diseases, infections, immunodepression;
  • patients in therapy with anticoagulants or antiaggregants;
  • use of NSAIDs in the 5 days before blood donation;
  • previous intra-articular injections in the past 6 months before blood donation;
  • previous knee surgery in the past 12 months before blood donation;
  • patients with Hb values \< 11 g/dl and platelet values \< 150,000/mmc

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

II Orthopaedic Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40136, Italy

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Kon E, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to treat sports injuries: evidence to support its use. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Apr;19(4):516-27. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1306-y. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

    PMID: 21082164BACKGROUND
  • Kon E, Buda R, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Timoncini A, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Giannini S, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma: intra-articular knee injections produced favorable results on degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Apr;18(4):472-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0940-8. Epub 2009 Oct 17.

    PMID: 19838676BACKGROUND
  • Filardo G, Kon E, Buda R, Timoncini A, Di Martino A, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Giannini S, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Apr;19(4):528-35. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1238-6. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

    PMID: 20740273BACKGROUND
  • Patel S, Dhillon MS, Aggarwal S, Marwaha N, Jain A. Treatment with platelet-rich plasma is more effective than placebo for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):356-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546512471299. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

    PMID: 23299850BACKGROUND
  • Cerza F, Carni S, Carcangiu A, Di Vavo I, Schiavilla V, Pecora A, De Biasi G, Ciuffreda M. Comparison between hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma, intra-articular infiltration in the treatment of gonarthrosis. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2822-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512461902. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

    PMID: 23104611BACKGROUND
  • Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Di Matteo B, Merli ML, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid to treat knee degenerative pathology: study design and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Nov 23;13:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-229.

    PMID: 23176112BACKGROUND
  • Sanchez M, Fiz N, Azofra J, Usabiaga J, Aduriz Recalde E, Garcia Gutierrez A, Albillos J, Garate R, Aguirre JJ, Padilla S, Orive G, Anitua E. A randomized clinical trial evaluating plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF-Endoret) versus hyaluronic acid in the short-term treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2012 Aug;28(8):1070-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.011.

    PMID: 22840987BACKGROUND
  • Filardo G, Kon E, Roffi A, Di Matteo B, Merli ML, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma: why intra-articular? A systematic review of preclinical studies and clinical evidence on PRP for joint degeneration. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Sep;23(9):2459-74. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2743-1. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

    PMID: 24275957BACKGROUND
  • Kon E, Filardo G, Di Matteo B, Marcacci M. PRP for the treatment of cartilage pathology. Open Orthop J. 2013 May 3;7:120-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010120. Print 2013.

    PMID: 23730375BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cartilage Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Alessandro Di Martino, MD

    II Clinic and Biomechanics Lab,Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
BScD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2014

First Posted

May 9, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 30, 2018

Study Completion

April 30, 2018

Last Updated

August 8, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations