Platelet Rich Plasma vs Hyaluronic-Acid in Hip OA (Osteoarthritis)
A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic-Acid in the Short-term Treatment of Symptomatic OA (Osteoarthritis) of the Hip
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of intra-articular injections of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) vs hyaluronic acid (HA) for symptomatic early osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. Secondarily, this study aims to determine the feasibility and safety of treating early OA of the hip with HA and PRP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 5, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 25, 2021
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
February 1, 2021
6.3 years
August 7, 2013
December 2, 2020
February 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Survivorship, as Measured by the Frequency of Patient Withdrawal of Their Treated Hip to Undergo Surgery (Total Hip Arthroplasty [THA] or Hip Resurfacing Procedure).
To measure duration of clinical benefit, survivorship was analyzed by investigating the frequency of patient withdrawal of their treated hip to undergo surgery (total hip arthroplasty \[THA\] or hip resurfacing procedure). Survivorship was evaluating hips, not patients in this outcome measure. This served as the primary outcome measure for the study.
Baseline, 24 Months
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Sub-score
The primary efficacy outcome was defined as the percentage of patients having a 50% decrease in the summed score for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain sub-score from baseline to week 24. The WOMAC score is a normalized patient-reported outcome measure in which 0 represents the worst possible score and 100 represents the best possible score. The WOMAC is primarily used in osteoarthritis clinical trials to evaluate the effects of arthroplasty and drug interventions in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Thus, a 50% increase in the WOMAC pain sub-score would indicate reduced pain or improvement, while a 50% decrease would indicate worsening pain.
Baseline, Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Scores at Baseline
Baseline
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Scores at Week 6
Week 6
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Scores at Week 12
Week 12
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Scores at Week 24
Week 24
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Scores
Baseline, Month 24
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients With Adverse Events
Week 2-Week 3 and 6-12-18-24 months
Study Arms (2)
Autologous PRP Hip Injection
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to this group of treatment will receive 3 blinded hip intra-articular injections of autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma one week apart from each other.
Hyaluronic Acid Hip Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to this group of treatment will receive 3 blinded hip intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (SUPARTZ hyaluronate/2.5ml) one week apart each other.
Interventions
Each PRP preparation requires a total of 36 ml of peripheral blood. This will be obtained via venapuncture and collected in four 9 ml extraction tubes containing 3.8% sodium citrate. The tubes are then centrifuged at 640 rpm for 8 minutes at room temperature. The 1ml plasma fraction located above the buffy coat is aspirated from each tube and dispensed into the fractioning tube. The entire PRP process takes place under laminar airflow. Immediately prior to injection, calcium chloride is is drawn up from the activator ampoule with the activation syringe and is added to the PRP fractioning tube. The activated PRP is then injected in its entirety into the hip joint under strict aseptic technique.
Hyaluronic acid is supplied as a non-pyrogenic solution in 2.5 ml pre-filled syringes and is administered by intra-articular injection using a 22-23 gauge needle. The full 2.5 ml is injected in one joint under strict aseptic administration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female age 30-72 inclusive.
- Symptomatic early OA of the hip (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 1-2-3) documented by x-ray taken within the past 6 months.
- Women of childbearing potential will be allowed to enroll but must be willing to practice one highly effective method of contraception (oral, injectable or implanted hormonal methods of contraception, placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) condom or occlusive cap with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository, male sterilization, or true abstinence) throughout the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with polyarticular disease.
- Patients with major conditions such as poorly control diabetes, Cardiac Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or untreated depression
- Patients with known blood disorders (Blood disorders (thrombopathy, thrombocytopenia, anemia with hemoglobin \<9g/dL).
- Patients who had intra-articular treatment with steroids within 6 months of randomization in this study or received more than 3 previous intra-articular steroid injections to the effected hip.
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing at the time of consent.
- Patients with inflammatory arthritic conditions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
- Non-English speaking patients. (Scores used for evaluation have not been validated in Spanish)
- Patients who had previous hip surgery
- Additional disabilities in any of the lower limbs that would interfere with any of the clinical assessments.
- Chronic use of NSAID (defined as taking NSAID regularly every week for the last 6 months), steroids or chemotherapy drugs
- Treatment with NSAIDs within 2 days prior to randomization in this study
- Patients with a BMI over 30. Due to the fact that this study utilize an injection technique which may be inaccurate in obese subjects.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado, Hip Preservation Center, Orthopedic Department
Boulder, Colorado, 80304, United States
Related Publications (6)
Mei-Dan O, McConkey MO, Petersen B, McCarty E, Moreira B, Young DA. The anterior approach for a non-image-guided intra-articular hip injection. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1025-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
PMID: 23591381BACKGROUNDMei-Dan O, Carmont M, Laver L, Mann G, Maffulli N, Nyska M. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint: a pilot study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Mar-Apr;52(2):172-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
PMID: 23333279BACKGROUNDMei-Dan O, Carmont MR, Laver L, Mann G, Maffulli N, Nyska M. Platelet-rich plasma or hyaluronate in the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):534-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546511431238. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PMID: 22253252BACKGROUNDMei-Dan O, Laver L, Nyska M, Mann G. [Platelet rich plasma--a new biotechnology for treatment of sports injuries]. Harefuah. 2011 May;150(5):453-7, 490. Hebrew.
PMID: 21678642BACKGROUNDMei-Dan O, Lippi G, Sanchez M, Andia I, Maffulli N. Autologous platelet-rich plasma: a revolution in soft tissue sports injury management? Phys Sportsmed. 2010 Dec;38(4):127-35. doi: 10.3810/psm.2010.12.1835.
PMID: 21150152BACKGROUNDKraeutler MJ, Houck DA, Garabekyan T, Miller SL, Dragoo JL, Mei-Dan O. Comparing Intra-articular Injections of Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Low-Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Hip: A Double-Blind, Randomized Pilot Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 20;9(1):2325967120969210. doi: 10.1177/2325967120969210. eCollection 2021 Jan.
PMID: 33786329DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Outcome measures descriptions are accurate to the approved protocol. Wording was modified slightly from the original registration for the purposes of results data reportability to the ClinicalTrials.gov data tables.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Omer Mei-Dan, MD
- Organization
- University of Colorado, Denver
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Omer Mei-Dan, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2013
First Posted
August 9, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 5, 2019
Study Completion
December 5, 2019
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Results First Posted
January 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02