Automated Closed-loop in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
APCam09
An Open-label, Single-centre, Randomised, 2-period Cross-over Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Automated Overnight Closed-loop Glucose Control System on Day 1 of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Insertion in Comparison to Day 3 to 4 After Sensor Insertion in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People with type 1 diabetes need regular insulin injections or continuous delivery of insulin using a pump. Keeping blood sugars in the normal range is known to reduce long term complications. However, achieving treatment goals can be very difficult due to the risk of low glucose levels (hypoglycaemia). One solution is to use a system where the amount of insulin injected closely matches the blood sugar levels on a continuous basis. This can be achieved by what is known as a "closed loop system" where a small glucose sensor placed under the skin communicates with a computer containing an algorithm that drives a subcutaneous insulin pump. Previous studies conducted under carefully controlled clinical research facility environment, in Cambridge, United Kingdom, as well as several other centres have shown that closed-loop glucose control is superior to usual insulin pump therapy. The next logical step in the development pathway is to test closed loop systems in the home environment. An essential requirement for conducting closed-loop studies outside clinical research facility is an automated system where wireless data transmission takes place between the glucose sensor and insulin pump. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of automated overnight closed-loop, in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, using a novel system which has greatest potential for use in the home setting. The study will take place at a clinical research facility on two occasions, using a standardised protocol. The performance of the closed-loop system will be evaluated on day 1 of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor life as compared to on days 3 to 4 of sensor life. Data and experience gained from this study will be used for further refinements and development of the system for future home use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Apr 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 3, 2017
February 1, 2017
1 year
April 23, 2014
February 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time spent with plasma glucose concentration in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 8.0 mmol/l.
The primary outcome measure is time spent with plasma glucose concentration in the target range (3.9-8.0mmol/L) between 21:30 on Day 1 and 07:30 on Day 2 (10 hours), as obtained with closed-loop insulin delivery on day 1 of CGM sensor insertion as compared with closed-loop insulin delivery on day 3 to 4 of CGM sensor insertion.
10 hours
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time spent with plasma glucose concentration below the target range (<3.9mmol/L) between 21:30 on Day 1 and 07:30 on Day 2 (10 hours).
10 hours
Time spent with plasma glucose concentration above the target range (>8mmol/L) between 21:30 on Day 1 and 07:30 on Day 2 (10 hours).
10 hours
Mean and standard deviation of plasma glucose levels between 21:30 on Day 1 and 07:30 on Day 2 (10 hours).
10 hours
Total insulin delivery between 21:30 on Day 1 and 07:30 on Day 2 (10 hours).
10 hours
Total basal insulin delivery between 21:30 on Day 1 and 07:30 on Day 2 (10 hours).
10 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Percentage of time the system is functioning as intended in active closed-loop mode.
14 hours
CGM failure (defined as no CGM glucose available for whatever reason; failure rate )
14 hours
Problems with user interface / Android platform (failure rate)
14 hours
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Closed-loop on day 1 of CGM sensor life
EXPERIMENTALGlucose level is controlled by the automated closed-loop glucose control system on day 1 after CGM sensor insertion.
Closed-loop on day 3 of CGM sensor life
ACTIVE COMPARATORGlucose level is controlled by the automated closed-loop glucose control system on day 3 or 4 after CGM sensor insertion.
Interventions
The closed-loop system is purpose-built and comprises a hand-held computer containing a model predictive control (MPC) based glucose control algorithm and communicating with the CGM device and the insulin pump. The Android Closed-Loop platform employs the Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm® Veo™ insulin pump system with CGM capability (use of MiniLink™Transmitter and sensor). A Radiofrequency (RF) translator module translates the RF protocol to Bluetooth® technology. An Android device containing an algorithm will use sensor glucose data to calculate pump strokes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is between 6 and 18 years of age.
- The subject has had type 1 diabetes, as defined by WHO criteria for at least 1 year or is confirmed C-peptide negative.
- The subject will have been an insulin pump user for at least 3 months, with a good knowledge of insulin dose adjustment.
- HbA1c between below 11 % based on analysis from central laboratory.
- The subject is literate in English.
- The subject is willing to undertake all study related activities.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus including those secondary to chronic disease.
- Any other physical or psychological disease likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results.
- Current treatment with drugs known to interfere with glucose metabolism such as systemic corticosteroids, non-selective beta-blockers and MAO inhibitors.
- Known or suspected allergy against insulin.
- Subjects with clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or proliferative retinopathy as judged by the investigator
- Patient is pregnant, or breast feeding during the period of the study.
- Total daily insulin dose ≥ 2 Units/kg/day
- Total daily insulin dose \< 10 Units/day
- Severe visual impairment
- Severe hearing impairment
- Subjects using implanted internal pacemaker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Hovorka R, Allen JM, Elleri D, Chassin LJ, Harris J, Xing D, Kollman C, Hovorka T, Larsen AM, Nodale M, De Palma A, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dunger DB. Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):743-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61998-X. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
PMID: 20138357BACKGROUNDHovorka R, Kumareswaran K, Harris J, Allen JM, Elleri D, Xing D, Kollman C, Nodale M, Murphy HR, Dunger DB, Amiel SA, Heller SR, Wilinska ME, Evans ML. Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies. BMJ. 2011 Apr 13;342:d1855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1855.
PMID: 21493665BACKGROUNDElleri D, Allen JM, Biagioni M, Kumareswaran K, Leelarathna L, Caldwell K, Nodale M, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Evaluation of a portable ambulatory prototype for automated overnight closed-loop insulin delivery in young people with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Sep;13(6):449-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2012.00903.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
PMID: 22817340BACKGROUNDKumareswaran K, Elleri D, Allen JM, Harris J, Xing D, Kollman C, Nodale M, Murphy HR, Amiel SA, Heller SR, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Meta-analysis of overnight closed-loop randomized studies in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: the Cambridge cohort. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1352-62. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500606.
PMID: 22226252BACKGROUNDTauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, Ruan Y, Thabit H, Acerini CL, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Sensor Life and Overnight Closed Loop: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):513-521. doi: 10.1177/1932296816678631. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
PMID: 27837162RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roman Hovorka, PhD
University of Cambridge
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2014
First Posted
May 2, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02