Closed Loop From Onset in Type 1 Diabetes
CLOuD
An Open-label, Multicentre, Randomised, Single-period, Parallel Design Study to Assess the Effect of Closed Loop Insulin Delivery From Onset of Type 1 Diabetes in Youth on Residual Beta Cell Function Compared to Standard Insulin Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to use a novel treatment approach, the artificial pancreas, after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) to improve glucose control with the anticipated improvements of residual C-peptide secretion. This is an open-label, multicentre, single-period, randomised, parallel group design study. It is expected that a total of up to 190 subjects (aiming for 96 randomised subjects) will be recruited within ten working days of diagnosis of type 1 diabetes through paediatric diabetes centres in the UK. Half of the participants aged 10 to 16.9 years will be treated by conventional insulin injections and the other half by the artificial pancreas (closed loop insulin delivery system). Each treatment will last 24 months. All participants completing the 24 month study period will be invited to continue in an optional extension phase with the treatment allocated at randomisation for a further 24 months. Subjects in the intervention group will receive additional training on components of the artificial pancreas, i.e. insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), prior to starting closed loop insulin delivery. Subjects in the control intervention group will continue with standard therapy, i.e. multiple daily injection therapy. The study includes up to 14 visits and 1 telephone/email contact for subjects completing the study. After run-in and randomisation, visits will be conducted every 3 months in both arms. Beta-cell function will be assessed by serial measurement of C-peptide in response to a standardised mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). MMTTs will be conducted at baseline, 6-,12- and 24 months post diagnosis. The primary outcome is the between group difference in the area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC) of the MMTT at 12 month post diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include between group differences in stimulated C-peptide AUC over 24 months, differences in glycaemic control as assessed by HbA1c, time spent in glucose target range, glucose variability, hypo- and hyperglycaemia as recorded by periodically applied CGM, as well as insulin requirements and change in bodyweight. Additionally, cognitive, emotional and behavioural characteristics of participating subjects and parents will be assessed, and a cost utility analysis on the benefits of closed loop insulin delivery will be performed. Safety evaluation comprises assessment of the frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and number, nature and severity of other adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2024
CompletedMay 16, 2024
May 1, 2024
6.6 years
July 27, 2016
May 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Area under the meal stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC) during a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT)
12 months post diagnosis
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Mean stimulated C-peptide AUC during a mixed meal tolerance test
Baseline, 6 months and 24 months post diagnosis
HbA1c Levels
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis
Percentage of patients in each group with HbA1c <7.5% (58mmol/mol)
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis
Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose readings in the target range (3.9 to 10mmol/l)
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis
Mean sensor glucose level
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (10)
Severe hypoglycaemic episodes
24 month intervention period
Diabetes ketoacidosis
24 month intervention period
Adverse Events
24 month intervention period + 3 weeks
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
24/7 Closed loop delivery
EXPERIMENTALUnsupervised home use of day and night automated closed-loop insulin delivery system FlorenceM (Medtronic 640G insulin pump, guardian 3 CGM and Android smartphone) of CamAPS FX (Dana insulin pump, Dexcom G6 CGM and App on Android smartphone) until 24 months after diagnosis
Multiple Daily Injections
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will apply standard insulin therapy using multiple daily injections via insulin pens during the 24 months control period
Interventions
The automated closed-loop system (FlorenceM) will consist of: * Sensor augmented Medtronic insulin pump 640G (Medtronic Minimed, CA, USA) incorporating the Medtronic Enlite/Guardian 3 real time CGM and glucose suspend feature. * An Android smartphone containing the Cambridge model predictive algorithm and communicating wirelessly with the insulin pump using a proprietary translator device. The automated closed-loop system (CamAPS FX) will consist of: * Dana R or RS insulin pump * Dexcom G6 real-time CGM * CamAPS FX App on an unlocked android smartphone. Rapid acting insulin analogue will be used (insulin aspart, insulin lispro, insulin glulisine or similar or ultra-rapid insulin analogue).
Rapid acting insulin analogue and long acting insulin analogue will be subcutaneously administered using CE-marked insulin pen devices in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for their intended purposes. Participants will be given long acting analogue (insulin glargine, insulin detemir or similar) once or twice daily according to their needs and boluses of rapid acting analogue (insulin aspart, insulin lispro, insulin glulisine or similar or ultra-rapid insulin analogue) when carbohydrates are consumed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes within previous 21 days. Day 1 will be defined as the day insulin was first administered. Type 1 diabetes will be defined according to WHO criteria using standard diagnostic practice.
- \[WHO definition: 'The aetiological type named type 1 encompasses the majority of cases with are primarily due to beta-cell destruction, and are prone to ketoacidosis. Type 1 includes those cases attributable to an autoimmune process, as well as those with beta-cell destruction for which neither an aetiology nor a pathogenesis is known (idiopathic). It does not include those forms of beta-cell destruction or failure to which specific causes can be assigned (e.g. cystic fibrosis, mitochondrial defects, etc.).'\]
- The subject is at least 10 years and not older than 16.9 years
- The subject/carer is willing to perform regular capillary blood glucose monitoring, with at least 4 blood glucose measurements taken every day
- The subject is literate in English
- The subject is willing to wear glucose sensor
- The subject is willing to wear closed loop system at home
- The subject is willing to follow study specific instructions
- The subject is willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals
You may not qualify if:
- Physical or psychological condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results as judged by the investigator
- Current treatment with drugs known to interfere with glucose metabolism, e.g. systemic corticosteroids, non-selective beta-blockers and MAO inhibitors etc.
- Known or suspected allergy to insulin
- Regular use of acetaminophen
- Lack of reliable telephone facility for contact
- Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or breast feeding
- Living alone
- Severe visual impairment
- Severe hearing impairment
- Medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters or unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement
- Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located at places of the body, which potentially are possible to be used for localisation of the glucose sensor
- Illicit drugs abuse
- Prescription drugs abuse
- Alcohol abuse
- Sickle cell disease, haemoglobinopathy, receiving red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to time of screening
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- University of Cambridgelead
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Jaeb Center for Health Researchcollaborator
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
- University of Edinburghcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Southampton Children's Hospital
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Nottingham Children's Hospital
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, West Derby, L12 2AP, United Kingdom
St James's University Hospital
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
Royal Hospital for Sick Children
Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (7)
Hovorka R. Artificial Pancreas Project at Cambridge 2013. Diabet Med. 2015 Aug;32(8):987-92. doi: 10.1111/dme.12766. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
PMID: 25819473BACKGROUNDThabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dellweg S, Benesch C, Heinemann L, Mader JK, Holzer M, Kojzar H, Exall J, Yong J, Pichierri J, Barnard KD, Kollman C, Cheng P, Hindmarsh PC, Campbell FM, Arnolds S, Pieber TR, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2129-2140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
PMID: 26379095BACKGROUNDTauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, Thabit H, Stewart Z, Cheng P, Kollman C, Acerini CL, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free-Living, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jul;39(7):1168-74. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2078. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PMID: 26740634BACKGROUNDBoughton CK, Allen JM, Ware J, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, Thankamony A, Randell T, Ghatak A, Besser REJ, Elleri D, Trevelyan N, Campbell FM, Sibayan J, Calhoun P, Bailey R, Dunseath G, Hovorka R; CLOuD Consortium. Closed-Loop Therapy and Preservation of C-Peptide Secretion in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 8;387(10):882-893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203496.
PMID: 36069870DERIVEDRankin D, Kimbell B, Allen JM, Besser REJ, Boughton CK, Campbell F, Elleri D, Fuchs J, Ghatak A, Randell T, Thankamony A, Trevelyan N, Wilinska ME, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Adolescents' Experiences of Using a Smartphone Application Hosting a Closed-loop Algorithm to Manage Type 1 Diabetes in Everyday Life: Qualitative Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Sep;15(5):1042-1051. doi: 10.1177/1932296821994201. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
PMID: 34261348DERIVEDRankin D, Kimbell B, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Adolescents' and their parents' experiences of using a closed-loop system to manage type 1 diabetes in everyday life: qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2022 Dec;18(4):742-756. doi: 10.1177/1742395320985924. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
PMID: 33472409DERIVEDBoughton C, Allen JM, Tauschmann M, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Musolino G, Acerini CL, Dunger PD, Campbell F, Ghatak A, Randell T, Besser R, Trevelyan N, Elleri D, Northam E, Hood K, Scott E, Lawton J, Roze S, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Cohen N, Todd J, Hovorka R; CLOuD Consortium. Assessing the effect of closed-loop insulin delivery from onset of type 1 diabetes in youth on residual beta-cell function compared to standard insulin therapy (CLOuD study): a randomised parallel study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e033500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033500.
PMID: 32169925DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roman Hovorka, PhD
Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ajay Thankamony, MD
Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Atrayee Ghatak, MD
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tabitha Randell, MD
Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rachel Besser, MD
Oxford Children's Hospital, Oxford, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicola Trevelyan, MD
Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniela Elleri, MD
Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fiona Campbell, MD
Leeds Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2016
First Posted
August 18, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 31, 2023
Study Completion
July 31, 2024
Last Updated
May 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share