Closing the Loop in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes in the Home Setting
APCam08
An Open-label, Three-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of Overnight Closed-loop in Comparison With CGM Alone in the Home Setting in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is one of the most common chronic childhood diseases requiring lifelong insulin therapy. Children and adolescents with T1D need regular insulin injections or the continuous insulin delivery using an insulin pump in order to keep blood glucose levels normal. We know that keeping blood sugars in the normal range will help prevent longterm diabetes-related complications involving the eyes, kidneys and heart. However, achieving treatment goals can be very difficult as the tighter we try to control blood glucose levels, the greater the risk to develop symptoms and signs of low glucose levels (hypoglycaemia). This is a particular problem at night and one solution is to develop a system whereby the amount of insulin injected is controlled by a computer and is very closely matched to the blood sugar levels on a continuous basis. This can be achieved by what is known as a "closed-loop system" where a small glucose sensor placed under the skin communicates with a computer containing an algorithm that drives an insulin pump. We have been testing such a system in Cambridge over the last five years in children and have found that this system is effective at maintaining tight glucose control and preventing nocturnal hypoglycaemia. More recently the system has been tested in real life conditions in the home setting for three weeks during a pilot single-centre study. The next step is to extend the evaluation of closed-loop over a prolonged period of three months. In the present study we are planning to study 24 young people aged 6-18 years on insulin pump therapy. During three months glucose will be controlled by the computer and during the other three months the subjects will make their own adjustments to the insulin therapy using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. We aim to determine the effect of the computer algorithm in keeping glucose levels between 3.9 and 8 mmol/L (normal levels). Safety evaluation comprises assessment of the frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes. Participants' response to the use of the system in terms of lifestyle change, daily diabetes management and fear of hypoglycaemia will be assessed. We will also test for longer term glucose control by measuring glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 diabetes-mellitus
Started Dec 2013
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 3, 2017
February 1, 2017
1.2 years
January 25, 2013
February 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time spent overnight in the target glucose range (3.9 to 8.0 mmol/l), as assessed by adjusted continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM)
3 month home study period
Secondary Outcomes (12)
The proportion of nights when glucose levels drop below 3.5 mmol/l for 20 minutes or longer, as recorded by CGM
3 month home study period
Time spent above and below the target glucose (3.9 to 8.0 mmol/l) based on CGM.
3 month home study period
The time with glucose levels in the significant hyperglycaemia range (glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l) as recorded by CGM
3 month home study period
Metabolic control assessed by HbA1c
3 month home study period
Average and standard deviation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM
3 month home study period
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Safety evaluation
3 month home study period
Utility Evaluation
3 month home study period
Study Arms (2)
Overnight closed-loop combined with CGM
EXPERIMENTALGlucose level is controlled by the automated closed loop glucose control system. After initial training with the closed-loop system devices, subjects will use the closed-loop system overnight at home for a total duration of 12 weeks.
Real-time CGM alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subjects will use the study CGM alone at home for the period of 12 weeks. Glucose level will be controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Interventions
The closed-loop system is purpose-built and comprises a hand-held computer containing a model predictive control (MPC) based glucose control algorithm and communicating with the CGM device and the insulin pump.
Subject glucose level controlled by usual insulin pump therapy in conjunction with real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is between 6 and 18 years of age (inclusive)
- The subject has type 1 diabetes, as defined by WHO for at least 1 year or is confirmed C-peptide negative
- The subject will have been an insulin pump user for at least 3 months, with good knowledge of insulin self-adjustment as judged by the investigator
- The subject is willing to perform regular finger-prick blood glucose monitoring, with at least 4 blood glucose measurements taken every day
- HbA1c ≤ 10 % based on analysis from central laboratory or equivalent
- The subject is literate in English
You may not qualify if:
- Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus including those secondary to chronic disease
- Untreated celiac disease
- Any other physical or psychological disease likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results as judged by the investigator
- Current treatment with drugs known to interfere with glucose metabolism, e.g. systemic corticosteroids, non-selective beta-blockers and MAO inhibitors etc.
- Known or suspected allergy against insulin
- Subjects with clinical significant nephropathy, neuropathy or proliferative retinopathy as judged by the investigator
- Total daily insulin dose ≤ 2 IU/kg/day
- Total daily insulin dose \< 10 IU/day
- Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or breast feeding
- Severe visual impairment
- Severe hearing impairment
- Subjects using implanted internal pace-maker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Cambridgelead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- University College London Hospitalscollaborator
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
University College London Hospital
London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Elleri D, Allen JM, Biagioni M, Kumareswaran K, Leelarathna L, Caldwell K, Nodale M, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Evaluation of a portable ambulatory prototype for automated overnight closed-loop insulin delivery in young people with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Sep;13(6):449-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2012.00903.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
PMID: 22817340BACKGROUNDKumareswaran K, Elleri D, Allen JM, Harris J, Xing D, Kollman C, Nodale M, Murphy HR, Amiel SA, Heller SR, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Meta-analysis of overnight closed-loop randomized studies in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: the Cambridge cohort. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1352-62. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500606.
PMID: 22226252BACKGROUNDHovorka R, Kumareswaran K, Harris J, Allen JM, Elleri D, Xing D, Kollman C, Nodale M, Murphy HR, Dunger DB, Amiel SA, Heller SR, Wilinska ME, Evans ML. Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies. BMJ. 2011 Apr 13;342:d1855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1855.
PMID: 21493665BACKGROUNDHovorka R, Allen JM, Elleri D, Chassin LJ, Harris J, Xing D, Kollman C, Hovorka T, Larsen AM, Nodale M, De Palma A, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dunger DB. Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):743-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61998-X. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
PMID: 20138357BACKGROUNDThabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dellweg S, Benesch C, Heinemann L, Mader JK, Holzer M, Kojzar H, Exall J, Yong J, Pichierri J, Barnard KD, Kollman C, Cheng P, Hindmarsh PC, Campbell FM, Arnolds S, Pieber TR, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2129-2140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
PMID: 26379095RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roman Hovorka, PhD
University of Cambridge
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Dunger, MD, FRCPCH
University of Cambridge
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Hindmarsh, MD, FRCPCH
University College London Hospitals
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fiona Campbell, MD, FRCPCH
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2013
First Posted
January 29, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02