Study Stopped
Inclusion curve too poor.
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Via a Single Port, Peri-umbilical Technique Versus a Conventional Laparoscopic Technique
HOT
2 other identifiers
interventional
7
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is the comparison of the effective duration of hospitalization following laparoscopic hysterectomy via a single-port peri-umbilical technique versus an conventional multi-port technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 22, 2015
October 1, 2015
6 months
April 10, 2013
October 21, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of hospital stay in hours
Maximum 1 month (usually 3 to 5 days)
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Difference in hours between real discharge time and theoretical discharge time
4 weeks
Bleeding/fluid loss: Difference between lavage fluids and aspiration fluids
Day 0 (during surgery)
Change in hemoglobin measure
Day 3 versus baseline
Change in hematocrit measure
Day 3 versus baseline
Surgical time, from first incision to closing
Day 0 (during surgery)
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Peri-umbilical single-port
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm have a hysterectomy via a single-port peri-umbilical laparoscopic surgical technique. Intervention: Single-port, peri-umbilical hysterectomy
Multi-port
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm have a hysterectomy via a conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgical technique. Intervention: Multi-port hysterectomy
Interventions
Patients in this arm have a hysterectomy via a single-port peri-umbilical laparoscopic surgical technique.
Patients in this arm have a hysterectomy via a conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgical technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must have given her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 12 months of follow-up
- The patient is declared fit by the anesthetist for an intervention by laparoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is not available for 12 months of follow-up
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient is not insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient cannot read French
- Patient with a history of pelvic radiotherapy
- Patient with a history of pelvic surgery or serious risk of major adhesions
- The patient is pregnant
- Contraindications for anesthesia for either surgical technique
- Promontofixation or lymphadenectomy
- No associated procedure other than morcellation or vaginal suture for extracting the hysterectomy specimen, unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy
- The patient has a known or suspected allergy to polyurethane
- Extended hysterectomy for neoplastic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
APHM - Hôpital de la Conception
Marseille, 13385, France
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
CHU de Saint Etienne - Hôpital Nord
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vincent Letouzey, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2013
First Posted
April 12, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10