ACell MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Versus Native Tissue Repair, Comparative Study
Evaluation of the Use of Transvaginal Resorbable Biologic Mesh as Compared to Traditional Non-Mesh Surgical Repair for Treating Pelvic Floor Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
161
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix as compared to native tissue repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients are evaluated throughout a 3 year follow-up period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 11, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 28, 2021
CompletedFebruary 8, 2022
February 1, 2022
6.9 years
December 20, 2013
February 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The safety and effectiveness of surgical success/failure.
The composite outcome of surgical success evaluates anatomic outcome, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment pelvic organ prolapse.
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The surgical success/failure based on an alternate definition of success.
3 years
Study Arms (2)
MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix
EXPERIMENTALsurgical mesh device
Native Tissue Repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORsuture repair
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject's leading edge of POP is at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Ba ≥ 0 or Bp ≥ 0 or C ≥ 0 (for prolapse of the apical compartment alone) or C ≥ -½ total vaginal length (for a multi-compartment prolapse that includes the apical compartment).
- Subject is seeking surgical intervention for symptomatic POP, which is defined as experiencing symptoms of vaginal bulging or pelvic heaviness. Vaginal bulge or pelvic heaviness will be considered present if a subject responds "yes" (≥1) to PFDI-20, question 3.
- Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing to provide written informed consent.
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a known hypersensitivity to porcine-based materials (relevant to subjects in MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Group only).
- Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study.
- Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis.
- Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or stroke with residual neurologic deficit).
- Subject has chronic systemic pain syndrome (e.g. fibromyalgia, painful bladder syndrome).
- Subject has a systemic connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica).
- Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
- Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical).
- Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area.
- Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months).
- Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for POP (colpoclesis).
- Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position.
- Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study.
- Subject is to planning to undergo concurrent surgical treatment of prolapse using mesh other than the MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Stanford School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Cleveland Clinic FLorida
Weston, Florida, 33331, United States
Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503, United States
Premier Urology Group
Edison, New Jersey, 08837, United States
Atlantic Health System
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States
Princeton Urogynecology
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States
Garden State Urology
Whippany, New Jersey, 07981, United States
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley
Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601, United States
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, United States
Center for Pelvic Health
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2013
First Posted
December 27, 2013
Study Start
June 11, 2014
Primary Completion
April 28, 2021
Study Completion
April 28, 2021
Last Updated
February 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share