Sonographic Evaluation of the Effect of Shoulder Orthosis on the Subluxation in Stroke Patients
SinSbyS&Co
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Shoulder pain is frequently reported as a complication among stroke patients. Muscular imbalance disrupts stability of the glenohumeral joint creating a subluxation. Stretching the soft tissue can cause shoulder pain which impedes quality of life, length of stay and rehabilitation outcome. To align the humeral head in the cavitas glenoïdalis a shoulder orthosis is often provided to the patient. Since the use of these orthoses is not always considered positive by the patient nor the therapist the question rises if the investigators can objectify if the subacromial space is reduced when wearing a sling. Sonography is a valid way to asses subluxation of the shoulder joint by measuring the subacromial space. To objectify if an orthosis can reduce the enlarged subacromial space the investigators will use sonography to measure the distance between acromion and greater tuberosity are between acromion and the humeral head. This distance will be measured with and without the orthosis and also after a period of at least 4 hours of wearing the orthosis. This last measurement might inform us about how long the orthosis can correct the glenohumeral position. To validate the sonographic measurement X-rays will be taken by a sample of the investigators study population to compare with the ultrasound data. Two different orthoses will be compared. First of all the actimove sling, which is standardly used in the rehabilitation centre where patients will be recruited. This sling can be adapted by the patient itself and is very easy to wear. The disadvantage is that the elbow is continuously flexed, which enlarges the risk on contractures of m. biceps and m. brachioradialis. Also the negative influence on the interpretation of the body scheme and on the quantitative use of the arm can be reasons not to wear this kind of orthosis. The shoulderlift on the other hand is a newly developed orthosis which supports the shoulder joint with the arm extended. This is a more normal position during the daily living and stimulates the use of the paretic arm. An extra adaptation can be adjusted to make it possible to position the arm flexed in order to reduce oedema of the hand if necessary. The control group does not wear any orthosis at all. Additional the investigators will evaluate passive range of motion of the shoulder, spasticity of the upper limb (modified ashworth scale), active motion of the upper limb (fugl meyer assessment) and trunk stability (Trunk Impairment Scale) at starting point and after a period of 6 weeks wearing the orthosis minimal 6 hours a day. If possible the investigators will do an evaluation of balance on a moving platform and an evaluation of gait with and without the orthosis after 6 weeks to assess the impact of on balance and gait.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 27, 2021
CompletedDecember 15, 2022
December 1, 2022
7.7 years
March 17, 2014
December 13, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Acromio - humeral distance
at 9 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
Acromio - humeral distance
at 3 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Spasticity
at 9 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
Passive Range of motion
at 9 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
Trunk stability
at 9 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
comfort of the upper limb
at 9 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
Balance
at 9 weeks after admission in the rehabilitation center
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
actimove sling
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard orthosis: actimove sling
shoulderlift
EXPERIMENTALnewly developed orthosis: shoulderlift
controle group
NO INTERVENTIONno orthosis
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First stroke
- Patients must be able to sit independently on a chair with arm support during 30 minutes
You may not qualify if:
- No shoulder problems prior to stroke
- No severe cognitive problems that make it impossible to understand brief commands;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dirk Cambier, MD, PhD
University Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2014
First Posted
April 2, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 27, 2021
Study Completion
September 27, 2021
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12