Support Staff-client Interactions With Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Support Staff's Interactions With Adults With Intellectual Disability Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This exploratory and observational study focuses on adults with an intellectual disability (ID) and their support workers. Two groups of clients are observed: clients using Key Word Signing, and clients using aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Approximately half of adults with ID is estimated to experience communication difficulties. AAC supports them in their daily communication aiming at optimal participation in society. Current communication models, such as Participation Model (Beukelman \& Mirenda, 2005) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO, 2001), regard both client-related and environmental factors as important elements of communication. A substantial part of the environmental factors is made up of the communication partners' characteristics. In daycare and residential services for adults with ID the support worker is an important communication partner .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 11, 2017
November 1, 2017
2.8 years
March 24, 2014
December 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Signing rate of support workers and individuals with intellectual disabilities
Proportion: number of signed utterances divided by total number (spoken + exclusively spoken) of utterances
Three observation sessions over period of 2 weeks per participant, 2 years for all participants
Sign imitation rate support workers and individuals with intellectual disabilities
Proportion: number of manual sign imitations divided by total number manual signs produced
Three observation sessions over period of 2 weeks per participant, 2 years for all participants
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Explicit Attitude of direct care staff towards manual signs
One testing per participant, over period of 6 months for all participants
Implicit Attitude of direct care staff working in towards manual signs
One testing per participant, over period of 6 months for all participants
Communicative functions of individuals with intellectual disabilities
Three observation sessions over period of 2 weeks per participant, 2 years for all participants
Study Arms (2)
support workers & AAC users
Support workers who use KeyWordSigning in the communication with their client who has an intellectual disability
support workers & KWS users
Support workers who use aided AAC in the communication with their client who has an intellectual disability
Eligibility Criteria
Support workers who work in residential facilities or day-centres for adults with intellectual disability, in Flanders.
You may qualify if:
- uses AAC with client
- client has congenital intellectual disability
- supports client for at least 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- client has dementia symptoms
- client has severe, non-corrected visual impairment
- client has diagnosed autism
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
KULeuven
Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium
KULeuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ellen Rombouts, PhD cand.
KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2014
First Posted
March 31, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11