NCT02094976

Brief Summary

Increased intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) might influence on perioperative morbidity related to increased CVP, PVWP, SVR, PAP and decreased venous return and cardiac output. Prone position has been known to increase IAP. In clinical field, various apparatuses has developed to minimize IAP elevation during prone position operation. In this study, we would compare the changes of IAP and respiratory system compliance according to positional apparatus in prone position.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
138

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 20, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Prone positionIntra-abdominal pressureRespiratory system complianceJackson tableWilson frameChest roll

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • changes of Intraabdominal presure (IAP)

    Compare IAP changes from supine to prone according to the positional apparatus : Wilson frame, Chestrolls and Jackson table

    5 minute after position change

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Changes of IAP and total respiratory system comliance (Crs) accoridng to PEEP change

    1min after PEEP change

  • changes of dead space ventilation after position change

    5 minute after prone position

  • Hemodynamic change

    1min after PEEP change

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Estimated blood loss (EBL)

    intraoperatively

Study Arms (3)

Group C

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group C means active comparator group which use chest rolls intraoperatively for prone position.

Device: Chest roll

Group W

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group W means experimental group which use Wilson frame intraoperatively for prone position.

Device: Wilson frame

Group J

EXPERIMENTAL

Group J means experimental group which use Jackson surgical table intraoperatively for prone position.

Device: Jackson surgical table

Interventions

After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continous infusion, patients were turned to the prone position on a Jackson table with two padded supports on each side. The supports were positioned under the lateral chest and at the iliac crest.

Group J

After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continous infusion, patients were turned to the prone position on a Wilson frame. The supports were positioned vertically from shoulder to iliac crest.

Group W

After standard total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil continous infusion, patients were turned to the prone position on a chest roll. The supports were positioned vertically from shoulder to iliac crest.

Group C

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are scheduled for prone positioned spinal surgery
  • ASA Physical Status Classification System class I or II

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who did not agree
  • BMI \> 30kg/m2
  • Patients who did not insert urinary foley catheter
  • Patients who have COPD or emphysema
  • Patients who have severe spine deformities such as scoliosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Seoul National University of Hospital

Seoul, 110-799, South Korea

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD

    Professor

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Eugene Kim, MD

    Clinical Instuctor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hee Pyung Park, MD Phd

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2014

First Posted

March 24, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 24, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations