Efficacy of HOFA Versus Hydrocolloid Dressings in the Prevention of PUs in Critically Ill Prone Patients
Efficacy of Hyperoxygenated Fatty Acids Versus Hydrocolloid Dressings in the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Prone Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
262
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Prone position (PP) treatment as a rescue strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a technique increasingly used in our daily practice and, as a result of the current health situation due to SARS COV-2, has become the treatment of choice for many patients. Many of the associated complications can be considerably reduced with the implementation of standardized procedures and a team trained and specialized in this technique and its subsequent care. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of the use of Hyperoxygenated Fatty Acids (HOFA) compared to the use of hydrocolloid dressings (HCD) in the prevention of Pressure ulcers (PUs) occurrence in critically ill patients in prone position. Methods: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare the occurrence of PUs and other complications in patients undergoing PP in the ICU of the HUPHM. Two care groups will be formed in which HOFA and hydrocolloid dressings will be used, respectively, following a strict care protocol previously established in the unit. In addition, other variables related to medical and nursing treatment that may influence the appearance of PUs and other complications associated with PP will also be analyzed. Scientific relevance: PUs have a major socioeconomic and quality of life impact on patients. Dressings and topical agents for prevention are widely used, however, it is unclear which treatment is most effective in preventing PUs in the prone patient. Keywords: Prone Position; Nursing care; Pressure ulcer; Fatty acids; Prevention; Complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
May 15, 2026
May 1, 2026
5.5 years
December 15, 2021
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pressure ulcers
The main outcome variable will be the appearance of pressure ulcers, location, extension and severity
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Hyperoxygenated Fatty Acids
EXPERIMENTALApplication of hyperoxygenated fatty acids in pressure zones for prevention of prone position pressure ulcers
Hydrocolloid dressings
EXPERIMENTALProtection of pressure areas with hydrocolloid dressings for the prevention of prone pressure ulcers
Interventions
Application of hyperoxygenated fatty acids in pressure zones for prevention of prone position pressure ulcers
Protection of pressure areas with hydrocolloid dressings for the prevention of prone pressure ulcers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients in prone position admitted to participating ICU who agree to be included in the study or, if they are unable to communicate, the consent is authorized by their referring family member.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with previous pressure ulcers in the following prone-related locations: shoulders, thorax, genitals, iliac crest, knees, ankles, facial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospitallead
- Ministry of Health, Spaincollaborator
- Carlos III Health Institutecollaborator
- Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronariascollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Majadahonda Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Related Publications (6)
Araujo MS, Santos MMPD, Silva CJA, Menezes RMP, Feijao AR, Medeiros SM. Prone positioning as an emerging tool in the care provided to patients infected with COVID-19: a scoping review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jan 8;29:e3397. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4732.3397. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33439949BACKGROUNDWhy Prone? Why Now? Improving Outcomes for ARDS Patients. Crit Care Nurse. 2019 Oct;39(5):84. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2019878. No abstract available.
PMID: 31575599BACKGROUNDPerrillat A, Foletti JM, Lacagne AS, Guyot L, Graillon N. Facial pressure ulcers in COVID-19 patients undergoing prone positioning: How to prevent an underestimated epidemic? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;121(4):442-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
PMID: 32565264BACKGROUNDTayyib N, Coyer F. Effectiveness of Pressure Ulcer Prevention Strategies for Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Dec;13(6):432-444. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12177. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
PMID: 27712030BACKGROUNDLima Serrano M, Gonzalez Mendez MI, Carrasco Cebollero FM, Lima Rodriguez JS. Risk factors for pressure ulcer development in Intensive Care Units: A systematic review. Med Intensiva. 2017 Aug-Sep;41(6):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 22. English, Spanish.
PMID: 27780589BACKGROUNDTayyib N, Coyer F, Lewis P. Saudi Arabian adult intensive care unit pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors: a prospective cohort study. Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):912-9. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12406. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
PMID: 25662591BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leire Maculet-García, RN
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- In this type of study, the aim is to guarantee internal validity by minimizing possible biases, which is why it is important to guarantee the randomization process and the measurement of variables with objectivity criteria. This type of clinical trial does not allow masking the person who performs the intervention, nor the person who measures the main outcome variable, since given the type of patient and the specific care required, it is not possible for a professional outside the patient's care to carry out the assessment of the patient. Blinded analysis of the patients will be guaranteed.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Registered Nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2021
First Posted
January 20, 2022
Study Start
June 12, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share