Clinical Evaluation of Nanoionomer Filling in Primary Teeth
CENFPT
Two-year Clinical Performance in Primary Teeth of Nano-filled Versus Conventional Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial was performed to evaluate the nano-filled resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) -with a brand name of "Ketac Nano"- as a filling material for the treatment of caries in primary teeth. Children aged 5-8 years were selected and treated with either Ketac Nano or another conventional RMGI called Vitremer. Then, the treated children were evaluated at baseline, after one yeat and after two years. The hypothesis to be tested in the present study was: The clinical performance of nano-filled RMGI (Ketac Nano) in class I primary molars will differ from that of its preceding conventional RMGI (Vitremer).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2014
CompletedMarch 20, 2014
March 1, 2014
4 months
March 11, 2014
March 17, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evidence of clinically definite deterioration of the evaluated filling materials at specific characters (parameters); marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, color match, anatomic form and recurrent caries.
The filling materials were blindly evaluated by two trained investigators at specific characters or parameters according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS). Each parameter has three grades of evaluation; Alfa (A), Bravo (B) and Charlie (C) that represent the degree of deterioration of the filling materials.
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Vitremer
SHAM COMPARATORDental caries was removed from primary molars and was filled with the conventional filling material;Vitremer (n = 30). The right molars was always filled by Vitremer. A split-mouth design was used in the present clinical trial. Twenty nine children were involved in the present study and every one had one bilateral identical pair of carious molars except one child that had two identical pairs. This design was performed to enhance the accuracy of the present study.
Ketac Nano
ACTIVE COMPARATORDental caries was removed from primary molars and was filled with the recent filling material; Ketac Nano (n=30). The left molars was always restored with Ketac Nano filling material.
Interventions
Class I carious primary molars were selected. Dental caries was removed and cavities were prepared. The recent nano-filled RMGI filling (Ketac Nano) was used to fill these cavities.
Class I carious primary molars were selected. Dental caries was removed and cavities were prepared. The conventional RMGI filling (Vitremer) was used to fill these cavities.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The presence of a bilateral identical pair of primary molars in the same arch containing initial occlusal caries (a minimum of two pits or fissures without any cusp destruction).
You may not qualify if:
- Handicapped or uncooperative children and children with extensive or rampant caries.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Tanta, 31111, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sahar E. Abo-Hamar, DMD, PhD
Tanta University, Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor (DMD, PhD)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2014
First Posted
March 20, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03