NCT02087956

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether priority-based patient navigation will improve patient satisfaction, quality of life (QOL), and depression when compared to screening-and-referral for socioeconomically disadvantaged women's health patients with depression. The investigators goal is to establish patient-driven, effective, generalizable, and disseminable interventions to reduce depression-related disparities and improve outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
223

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2014

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 7, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 7, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2014

Results QC Date

June 12, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

WomenDepressionSocioeconomically DisadvantagedNavigation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Patient Quality of Life

    We will use the WHOQOL-BREF measure. The WHOQOL-bref contains 26 items; the first two questions evaluate self-perceived quality of life and satisfaction with health.The remaining 24 questions represent four domains: physical, psychological, social relationships and environment. The WHOQOL-bref contains five Likert style response scales: "very poor to very good" (evaluation scale), "very dissatisfied to very satisfied" (evaluation scale), "none to extremely" (intensity scale), "none to complete" (capacity scale) and "never to always" (frequency scale).The mean score in each domain indicates the individual's perception of their satisfaction with each aspect of their life, relating it with quality of life. The higher the score, the better this is perceived to be. Total score was computed by summing all 26 items. The possible range is from 26 to 130.

    Post treatment (4 months after enrollment)

  • Depression Change Outcome Measure

    Depression was measured by PHQ-9, a screen for major depressive disorder with good discriminant validity and sensitivity to change validated in Ob/Gyn settings, and with pregnant and postpartum women, and with women of color. Scale ranges 0-27. Higher the score, higher severity of depression and cutpoints of 5, 10, 15 and 20 representing mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe levels of depressive symptoms.

    baseline, post treatment (4 months after enrollment), 3 months and 6 months follow up (7 and 10 months after enrollment)

  • Client Satisfaction Questionnaire- 8 Items

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an 8-item self-report instrument to assess subjective satisfaction with treatment which was administered to all participants post-treatment We analyzed 4 items: CSQ1: "How would you rate the quality of service you have received?", CSQ 3: "To what extent has our program met your needs?", CSQ 6: "Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?" and CSQ 7: "In an overall, general sense, how satisfied are you with the service you have received?" (1 = Excellent, 2 = Good, 3 = Fair, 4 = Poor). We are reporting on CSQ 1 outcome.

    Post treatment- 4 months after enrollment, 3 and 6 months follow-up (7 and 10 months after the enrollment)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Domestic Violence (Feldhaus)

    baseline, post treatment (4 months after enrollment), 3 and 6 months follow-up (7 and 10 months after enrollment)

Study Arms (2)

Personalized Support for Progress (PSP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In Personalized Support for Progress (PSP), patients meet with a navigator to prioritize their concerns using a decision aid, develop a plan based on their identified priorities, and execute the plan.

Behavioral: Navigation

Enhanced Screening and Referral (ESR)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

(ESR)- participant will receive personal report of their current needs and list of resources available in the community.

Behavioral: Enhanced Screening and Referral

Interventions

NavigationBEHAVIORAL

The navigator provides up to 4 months outreach and support to implement the personal care plan. Patients determine the preferred frequency and type of contact with the navigator. . At the end of the four months, the patient and navigator will review the personal care plan, and the navigator will work with the patient as to how she can continue progress through accessing other supports and resources as needed.

Also known as: mentoring
Personalized Support for Progress (PSP)

Patients assigned to ESR will be provided with a print-out of their Promote-W comprehensive health screening results. More specifically, they will receive a list of concerns they endorsed plus a resource list of locations where they can obtain assistance with those issues, which are largely free.

Also known as: Comprehensise health result screening
Enhanced Screening and Referral (ESR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with depression (PHQ9 score 10 or higher)
  • Patient of University of Rochester Women's Health Practice or Highland Women's Health
  • Monroe County resident
  • English speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently receiving case management services
  • In need of acute psychiatric services
  • Unable to commit to the duration of the project

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Rochester, Women Health Practice

Rochester, New York, 14620, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Interventions

Referral and Consultation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Professional PracticeOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services Administration

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Ellen Poleshuck
Organization
University of Rochester

Study Officials

  • Ellen Poleshuck, PhD

    University of Rochester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Women's Behavioral Health Service; Associate Professor, Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics & Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2014

First Posted

March 14, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

August 1, 2017

Last Updated

January 7, 2019

Results First Posted

January 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations