Realizing Opportunities for Self Empowerment
ROSE
Patient Priorities and Community Context: Navigation for Disadvantaged Women With Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
223
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether priority-based patient navigation will improve patient satisfaction, quality of life (QOL), and depression when compared to screening-and-referral for socioeconomically disadvantaged women's health patients with depression. The investigators goal is to establish patient-driven, effective, generalizable, and disseminable interventions to reduce depression-related disparities and improve outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 7, 2019
CompletedJanuary 7, 2019
January 1, 2019
2.6 years
March 12, 2014
June 12, 2017
January 3, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Patient Quality of Life
We will use the WHOQOL-BREF measure. The WHOQOL-bref contains 26 items; the first two questions evaluate self-perceived quality of life and satisfaction with health.The remaining 24 questions represent four domains: physical, psychological, social relationships and environment. The WHOQOL-bref contains five Likert style response scales: "very poor to very good" (evaluation scale), "very dissatisfied to very satisfied" (evaluation scale), "none to extremely" (intensity scale), "none to complete" (capacity scale) and "never to always" (frequency scale).The mean score in each domain indicates the individual's perception of their satisfaction with each aspect of their life, relating it with quality of life. The higher the score, the better this is perceived to be. Total score was computed by summing all 26 items. The possible range is from 26 to 130.
Post treatment (4 months after enrollment)
Depression Change Outcome Measure
Depression was measured by PHQ-9, a screen for major depressive disorder with good discriminant validity and sensitivity to change validated in Ob/Gyn settings, and with pregnant and postpartum women, and with women of color. Scale ranges 0-27. Higher the score, higher severity of depression and cutpoints of 5, 10, 15 and 20 representing mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe levels of depressive symptoms.
baseline, post treatment (4 months after enrollment), 3 months and 6 months follow up (7 and 10 months after enrollment)
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire- 8 Items
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an 8-item self-report instrument to assess subjective satisfaction with treatment which was administered to all participants post-treatment We analyzed 4 items: CSQ1: "How would you rate the quality of service you have received?", CSQ 3: "To what extent has our program met your needs?", CSQ 6: "Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?" and CSQ 7: "In an overall, general sense, how satisfied are you with the service you have received?" (1 = Excellent, 2 = Good, 3 = Fair, 4 = Poor). We are reporting on CSQ 1 outcome.
Post treatment- 4 months after enrollment, 3 and 6 months follow-up (7 and 10 months after the enrollment)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Domestic Violence (Feldhaus)
baseline, post treatment (4 months after enrollment), 3 and 6 months follow-up (7 and 10 months after enrollment)
Study Arms (2)
Personalized Support for Progress (PSP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Personalized Support for Progress (PSP), patients meet with a navigator to prioritize their concerns using a decision aid, develop a plan based on their identified priorities, and execute the plan.
Enhanced Screening and Referral (ESR)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(ESR)- participant will receive personal report of their current needs and list of resources available in the community.
Interventions
The navigator provides up to 4 months outreach and support to implement the personal care plan. Patients determine the preferred frequency and type of contact with the navigator. . At the end of the four months, the patient and navigator will review the personal care plan, and the navigator will work with the patient as to how she can continue progress through accessing other supports and resources as needed.
Patients assigned to ESR will be provided with a print-out of their Promote-W comprehensive health screening results. More specifically, they will receive a list of concerns they endorsed plus a resource list of locations where they can obtain assistance with those issues, which are largely free.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with depression (PHQ9 score 10 or higher)
- Patient of University of Rochester Women's Health Practice or Highland Women's Health
- Monroe County resident
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving case management services
- In need of acute psychiatric services
- Unable to commit to the duration of the project
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Rochester, Women Health Practice
Rochester, New York, 14620, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ellen Poleshuck
- Organization
- University of Rochester
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ellen Poleshuck, PhD
University of Rochester
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Women's Behavioral Health Service; Associate Professor, Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics & Gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2014
First Posted
March 14, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 7, 2019
Results First Posted
January 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01