NCT01083628

Brief Summary

This study aims to asses whether adding automated text messaging to group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression increases engagement which may lead to improved outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
85

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 19, 2010

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2010

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2017

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 12, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

February 19, 2010

Results QC Date

December 21, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

mhealthdepressionlatinostext messagingCBTSMS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • PHQ-9 Depression Symptoms

    The PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire - 9) is commonly used to screen for depression and to monitor progression of depressive symptoms over time. The scores represent the following depression severity: 0-4: minimal depression, 5-9: mild depression, 10-14: moderate depression, 15-19: moderately severe, 20-27: severe. A score of 10 is often recommended as the cut-off score for diagnosing an episode of depression that may require treatment.

    16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Attendance

    16 weeks

  • Duration of Therapy Attended

    16 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Group CBT for Depression with MoodText'

EXPERIMENTAL

Group cognitive behavioral therapy utilizing the BRIGHT manual for depression along with automated text messaging for mood monitoring and reminder of session content

Behavioral: Group CBT for Depression with MoodText

Group CBT for Depression

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard group cognitive behavioral therapy utilizing the BRIGHT manual for depression

Behavioral: Group CBT for Depression

Interventions

Mobile phone based text messaging to inquire about mood, cognitions, and behaviors on a daily basis.

Also known as: Group CBT for Depression with HealthySMS
Group CBT for Depression with MoodText'

Standard group CBT for depression using BRIGHT manual

Group CBT for Depression

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participation in CBT group at San Francisco General Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Active suicidality
  • Active and severe psychosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

San Francisco General Hospital

San Francisco, California, 94110, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Aguilera A, Berridge C. Qualitative feedback from a text messaging intervention for depression: benefits, drawbacks, and cultural differences. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 5;2(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3660.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Adrian Aguilera
Organization
University of California, Berkeley

Study Officials

  • Adrian Aguilera, Ph.D.

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2010

First Posted

March 10, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2017

Last Updated

August 12, 2019

Results First Posted

August 12, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations