Complications and Functional Outcome of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Younger Than 70 Years
2 other identifiers
interventional
118
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Patients younger than 70 years with a displaced femoral neck are in serious conditions. The femoral neck fracture is associated with low activity levels, hip pain and substantially reduced quality of life. Relatively young individuals with low-energy fractures tend to have additional morbidity or lower bone quality. The literature indicates that 5 % of all displaced femoral neck fractures are in patients aged 55 - 70 years. Little research and lack of consensus and guidance about appropriate treatment of these patients renders choice of treatment, and the health economic aspect a great challenge. In this study the investigators aim to answer if patients aged 55 - 70 years with displaced and low-energy femoral neck fractures treated with a total hip arthroplasty leads to a better functional outcome than osteosynthesis, and can patient-related factors be identified that predispose for femoral fracture? It is a randomized multi center study of patients operated with either total hip arthroplasty or osteosynthesis in which functional outcome, complications and reoperations are compared for the 2 groups. Additional controls are done after 4 and 12 months; 2 and possibly after 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. Map patient - related factors that predispose for displaced femoral neck fractures for patients aged 55 - 70 years. Map bone density measured with Dexa for two types of surgical procedures. Map complications and functional outcome after osteosynthesis or total hip replacement in patients aged 55 - 70 years with displaced femoral neck fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedJanuary 20, 2021
January 1, 2021
6 years
March 9, 2014
January 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Harris Hip score
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Harris Hip Score
4 months and 2 years
QoL questionnaire (EQ-5D)
4 and 12 months, 2 years
Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
4 and 12 months, 2 years
VAS
4 and 12 months, 2 years
Complications
4 and 12 months, 2 years
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Total hip replacement arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATOR59 off 118 patients will be randomized to total hip replacement arthroplasty
Closed reduction and internal fixation
ACTIVE COMPARATOR59 off 118 patients will be randomized to closed reduction and internal fixation. 2 cancellous parallel hip pins
Interventions
treatment with total hip replacement arthroplasty with the implant chosen by the institution
treatment with closed reduction and internal fixation with 2 cannulated hip pins
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with displaced femoral neck fractures Garden 3 or 4
- Age between 55 - 70 years
- Able to walk before injury
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate.
- Pathological fractures for other reasons than osteoporosis.
- Senility or dementia or lack of competence to give informed consent to participate
- Fracture on the opposite side at the same time
- Expected life duration less than 12 months and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 4 + 5
- Amputated leg
- Serious neurological disease that renders THA unsuitable
- Substance narcotic abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Akershuslead
- Ullevaal University Hospitalcollaborator
- Haukeland University Hospitalcollaborator
- Vestre Viken Hospital Trustcollaborator
- Lund University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
University Hospital, Akershus
Lørenskog, Akershus, 1478, Norway
Vestre Viken HF
Sandvika, Akershus, 1346, Norway
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Hordaland, 5021, Norway
Ullevaal University Hospital
Oslo, 0450, Norway
Related Publications (20)
Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I. A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):183-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.11923.
PMID: 11922358BACKGROUNDJohansson T, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I, Knutsson A, Wahlstrom O. Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Dec;71(6):597-602. doi: 10.1080/000164700317362235.
PMID: 11145387BACKGROUNDKeating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):249-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00215.
PMID: 16452734BACKGROUNDBlomfeldt R, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Tidermark J. Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures. Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1680-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02655.
PMID: 16085605BACKGROUNDTidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Soderqvist A, Tornkvist H. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Apr;85(3):380-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b3.13609.
PMID: 12729114BACKGROUNDBhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Swiontkowski MF, Berry DJ, Haidukewych G, Schemitsch EH, Hanson BP, Koval K, Dirschl D, Leece P, Keel M, Petrisor B, Heetveld M, Guyatt GH. Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):2122-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00535.
PMID: 16140828BACKGROUNDBhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Obremskey W, Koval KJ, Nork S, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Guyatt GH. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1673-81. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200309000-00004.
PMID: 12954824BACKGROUNDMasson M, Parker MJ, Fleischer S. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001708. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001708.
PMID: 12804413BACKGROUNDLu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Jan;76(1):15-25. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199401000-00003.
PMID: 8288658BACKGROUNDFrihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE. Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007 Dec 15;335(7632):1251-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39399.456551.25. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
PMID: 18056740BACKGROUNDMcKinley JC, Robinson CM. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with total hip arthroplasty: comparison of primary arthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty after failed internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Nov;84(11):2010-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200211000-00016.
PMID: 12429763BACKGROUNDFrihagen F, Madsen JE, Aksnes E, Bakken HN, Maehlum T, Walloe A, Nordsletten L. Comparison of re-operation rates following primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Injury. 2007 Jul;38(7):815-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.09.020. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
PMID: 17145058BACKGROUNDHeetveld MJ, Rogmark C, Frihagen F, Keating J. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: what is the evidence? J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jul;23(6):395-402. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318176147d.
PMID: 19550224BACKGROUNDRogmark C, Johnell O. Orthopaedic treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15;27(18-19):1143-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280500055933.
PMID: 16278183BACKGROUNDParker MJ, Handoll HH. Replacement arthroplasty versus internal fixation for extracapsular hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000086.
PMID: 10796293BACKGROUNDGjertsen JE, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, Vinje T, Fevang JM. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop. 2008 Oct;79(5):583-93. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016588.
PMID: 18839363BACKGROUNDFrihagen F, Grotle M, Madsen JE, Wyller TB, Mowinckel P, Nordsletten L. Outcome after femoral neck fractures: a comparison of Harris Hip Score, Eq-5d and Barthel Index. Injury. 2008 Oct;39(10):1147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.027. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
PMID: 18656868BACKGROUNDFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 1202204BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDHoelsbrekken SE, Opsahl JH, Stiris M, Paulsrud O, Stromsoe K. Failed internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Jun 12;132(11):1343-7. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.11.0715. English, Norwegian.
PMID: 22717859BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Torbjørn Omland, Professor
University Hospital, Akershus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD Senior Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2014
First Posted
March 13, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
January 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share