ASIS for Botox in Cervical Dystonia
ASISinCD
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Botox acts on nerve endings, yet there are no nerve endings inside the muscle, where they are typically injected. All nerves terminate on the fascia, where ASIS device can precisely deliver Botox by creating that subdermal bloodless space, between the skin and muscle. Thus enhancing and prolonging Botox's efficacy, at the same time prevent it's unnecessary adverse reactions and distant spread, especially since Botox has no reason to travel to the rest of the body any way.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedJune 24, 2015
June 1, 2015
5 months
February 26, 2014
June 22, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Relative Prolongation Ability Score for Gadolinium subdermally injected.
Gadolinium will be injected with ASIS subdermally (30) or conventional intramuscularly (30) in Cervical Dystonia adult patients for these 7 muscle groups: Splenius, Scalene, Sterno-cleido-mastoid, Levator scapulae, Semispinalis, Trapezius, and Longissimus. An MRI will be taken promptly after Gadolinium injection, as starting reference, to which subsequent MRI taken at 6 hrs, 12 hrs, and 24 hrs later will be compared for Persistent %. This approximation can only work if the variables are minimized to the same population with Cervical Dystonia, and these particular 7 muscle groups. The Relative Prolongation Ability Score or total Persistent % subdermally over total Persistent % intramuscularly, in Cervical Dystonia patients will not be like those of normal patients, or even the same between these 7 different muscle groups, but valuable indicators to help us modify Botox dosage and duration to inject into "unknown" subdermal bloodless space for Aim 2.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly vs. subdermally in Cervical Dystonia.
12 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs. subdermally in Cervical Dystonia.
12 months
Study Arms (22)
Splenius
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Scalene
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Sterno-cleido-mastoid
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Levator Scapulae
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Semispinalis
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Trapezius
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Longissimus
EXPERIMENTALGadolinium Magnevist® (gadopentetate dimeglumine) .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly for 30 patients, and subdermally with ASIS Device for 30 patients.
Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency
EXPERIMENTALChange from Baseline in Pain Frequency as Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 30 vs.Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity
EXPERIMENTALChange from Baseline in Pain Intensity as Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 30 vs.Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 30. The severity on scales of 0(no pain) to 4(constant or extremely severe intensity).
Change from Baseline in CDSS
EXPERIMENTALChange from Baseline in CDSS as Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 30 vs.Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 30. The CDSS or Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale quantifies the severity of abnormal head positioning and was newly devised for this study. CDSS allots 1 point for each 5 degrees (or part thereof) of head deviation in each of the three planes of head movement (range of scores up to theoretical maximum of 54).
Percent of Patients with Improved PGAS
EXPERIMENTALPercent of Patients with Improved PGAS as Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 30 vs.Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 6, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 12, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 18, Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 24, and Efficacy of Botox subdermally at Week 30. The Physician Global Assessment Scale or PGAS is a 9 category scale scoring the physician's evaluation of the patients' status compared to baseline, ranging from -4 to +4 (very marked worsening to complete improvement), with 0 indicating no change from baseline and +1 slight improvement.
Adverse Reactions with Facial paresis
EXPERIMENTALFacial paresis as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Eyelid ptosis
EXPERIMENTALEyelid ptosis as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Bronchitis
EXPERIMENTALBronchitis as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Neck pain
EXPERIMENTALNeck pain as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Muscle stiffness
EXPERIMENTALMusculoskeletal stiffness as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Muscular weakness
EXPERIMENTALMuscular weakness as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Myalgia
EXPERIMENTALMyalgia as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Muscle pain
EXPERIMENTALMusculoskeletal pain as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Muscle spasms
EXPERIMENTALMuscle spasms as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions Injection site pain
EXPERIMENTALInjection site pain as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Adverse Reactions with Hypertension
EXPERIMENTALHypertension as Adverse Reactions of Botox intramuscularly vs.Adverse Reactions of Botox subdermally at Week 30.
Interventions
Gadolinium .1cc/ diluted with .9ccNS intramuscularly with ASIS Device for 30 patients. Total cumulative Persistent % of Gadolinium intramuscularly on MRI at 6 hrs, 12 hrs, and 24 hrs.
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) intramuscularly at Week 6, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 12, in terms of Percent of Patients with Improved PGAS, or improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity, Change from Baseline in CDSS (Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale).
Efficacy of Botox intramuscularly at Week 18, in terms of Percent of Patients with Improved PGAS, or improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity, Change from Baseline in CDSS (Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) intramuscularly at Week 24, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) intramuscularly at Week 30, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) subdermally at Week 6, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) subdermally at Week 12, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) subdermally at Week 18, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) subdermally at Week 24, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Efficacy of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) subdermally at Week 30, in terms of improvement on the Physician Global Assessment Scale, and Change from Baseline in Pain Frequency, and Pain Intensity, as well as Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS).
Adverse Reactions of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) intramuscularly at Week 30, in number of Headache Migraine, Facial paresis, Eyelid ptosis, Bronchitis, Neck pain Musculoskeletal stiffness, Muscular weakness Myalgia, Musculoskeletal pain, Muscle spasms, Injection site pain, and Hypertension.
Adverse Reactions of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) subdermally at Week 30, in number of Headache Migraine, Facial paresis, Eyelid ptosis, Bronchitis, Neck pain Musculoskeletal stiffness, Muscular weakness Myalgia, Musculoskeletal pain, Muscle spasms, Injection site pain, and Hypertension.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with cervical dystonia, or abnormal head position and neck pain for these 7 muscle groups: Splenius, Scalene, Sterno-cleido-mastoid, Levator scapulae, Semispinalis, Trapezius, and Longissimus.
You may not qualify if:
- Known Hypersensitivity to Botulinum Toxin or to any of the components in the formulation.
- Infection at the Injection Site(s).
- Has any medical condition that may increase their risk with exposure to Botox including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other significant disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function.
- Has profound atrophy or weakness of muscles in the target areas of injection.
- Had previously received surgical or other denervation treatment for their symptoms or had a known history of neuromuscular disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- li nguyenlead
Study Sites (1)
Automatic Subdermal Injector System, Inc
Westminster, California, 92683, United States
Related Publications (9)
Lorenc ZP, Kenkel JM, Fagien S, Hirmand H, Nestor MS, Sclafani AP, Sykes JM, Waldorf HA. A review of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox). Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Mar;33(1 Suppl):9S-12S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12474629.
PMID: 23515199BACKGROUNDKnopp MV, Balzer T, Esser M, Kashanian FK, Paul P, Niendorf HP. Assessment of utilization and pharmacovigilance based on spontaneous adverse event reporting of gadopentetate dimeglumine as a magnetic resonance contrast agent after 45 million administrations and 15 years of clinical use. Invest Radiol. 2006 Jun;41(6):491-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000209657.16115.42.
PMID: 16763467BACKGROUNDVelickovic M, Benabou R, Brin MF. Cervical dystonia pathophysiology and treatment options. Drugs. 2001;61(13):1921-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161130-00004.
PMID: 11708764BACKGROUNDClaypool DW, Duane DD, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ 3rd. Epidemiology and outcome of cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis) in Rochester, Minnesota. Mov Disord. 1995 Sep;10(5):608-14. doi: 10.1002/mds.870100513.
PMID: 8552113BACKGROUNDTiderington E, Goodman EM, Rosen AR, Hapner ER, Johns MM 3rd, Evatt ML, Freeman A, Factor S, Jinnah HA. How long does it take to diagnose cervical dystonia? J Neurol Sci. 2013 Dec 15;335(1-2):72-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
PMID: 24034410BACKGROUNDAlbanese A, Sorbo FD, Comella C, Jinnah HA, Mink JW, Post B, Vidailhet M, Volkmann J, Warner TT, Leentjens AF, Martinez-Martin P, Stebbins GT, Goetz CG, Schrag A. Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):874-83. doi: 10.1002/mds.25579.
PMID: 23893443BACKGROUNDEvidente VG, Fernandez HH, LeDoux MS, Brashear A, Grafe S, Hanschmann A, Comella CL. A randomized, double-blind study of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin((R))) in cervical dystonia. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013 Dec;120(12):1699-707. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-1048-3. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
PMID: 23779062BACKGROUNDLeplow B, Bottcher M, Schonfeld R. [Botulinum toxin therapy for spasmodic torticollis: medical and non-medical adjunct treatment]. Nervenarzt. 2013 Apr;84(4):493-7. doi: 10.1007/s00115-012-3708-1. German.
PMID: 23371379BACKGROUNDVivancos-Matellano F, Ybot-Gorrin I, Diez-Tejedor E. A 17-year experience of abobotulinumtoxina in cervical dystonia. Int J Neurosci. 2012 Jul;122(7):354-7. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2012.665971. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
PMID: 22329596BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD/CEO/PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2014
First Posted
February 28, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06