Role of the SMA During Unimanual and Bimanual Movements Preparation: the Mirror Movements Paradigm
MOMIC2
Rôle de la SMA Dans la préparation Des Mouvements Uni et Bi-manuels: le Paradigme Des Mouvements en Miroir
2 other identifiers
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the project is to study the role of secondary motor area (more precisely the supplementary motor area, or SMA) during unimanual and bimanual voluntary movements externally (cue) or internally (subject's choice) triggered. In that view, we will study 3 experimental groups :
- a group of healthy volunteers (control group)
- the same group of healthy volunteers after a transient inactivation of the SMA (by the aim of repetitive trans cranial magnetic stimulation or TMS)
- a group of patients suffering from congenital mirror movements who are suspected to present a dysfunction of the SMA (according to our previous results) In each of these groups, by the aim of a serial reaction time task, we will study the influence of a SMA stimulation on the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) during the preparation of a voluntary movement (unimanual or bimanual). This will allow us to assess the communication between the SMA and M1 during movement preparation. Using the same task in functional imagery, we will study the activation's pattern of primary and secondary motor areas during movement preparation. This multimodal approach should allow us to better understand the synergistic functioning of these different structures involved in movement preparation. An other interesting aspect will be to determine the role of these structures in movement lateralization. Eventually, our results might allow us to precise to role of the motor preparation's dysfunction in the genesis of congenital mirror movements. In the first place, this study aims at a better understanding of the cerebral physiology of movement preparation (which is not well known) using the mirror movements paradigm as a dysfunction model (according to our previous results). According to our hypothesis, there is a strong link between the SMA and M1 during movement preparation. This hypothesis will be assessed by the use of the same experimental task with combined neurophysiological and neuroimaging approaches, thus increasing the validity of the results obtained. A secondary aim of this protocol is to precise the role of motor planning dysfunction in patients with congenital mirror movements. A better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for this condition is necessary in a medium-term therapeutic prospect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 29, 2025
August 1, 2016
1.9 years
January 16, 2014
August 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SMA activation level and connectivity during preparation of unimanual/bimanual movements
up to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
SMA activation level and connectivity during preparation of unimanual/bimanual movements in congenital mirror movements patients
up to 3 years
Study Arms (2)
Healthy volunteers
OTHERHealthy volunteers
Congenital mirror movements
OTHERPatients presenting with congenital mirror movements
Interventions
Morphological and functional brain MRI; transcranial magnetic stimulation
Morphological and functional brain MRI; transcranial magnetic stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged from 15 years and 3 months to 82 years
- Patients with congenital mirror movements without additional manifestation or malformation
- No contraindications for MRI or TMS study
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide an informed consent
- Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial
- Treatment that modulate cortical excitability (for the TMS part of the study only)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fédération des Maladies du Système Nerveux, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière Paris, France 75013
Paris, 75013, France
Related Publications (1)
Chole RA. Meatoplasty using inferiorly based island pedicle flap for congenital aural atresia. Laryngoscope. 1983 Jul;93(7):954-5. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198307000-00025. No abstract available.
PMID: 6865634BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emmanuel ROZE, MD
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2014
First Posted
February 27, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2016-08